TITLE

Continued Stopgap Measures Could Hurt Highway Funding

AUTHOR(S)
Sanchez, Humberto
PUB. DATE
October 2002
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;10/18/2002, Vol. 342 Issue 31494, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports the stopgap funding measures of the Congress in the U.S. Approval of the transportation appropriations bill; Finance of the federal programs; Disadvantages of the scheme.
ACCESSION #
7720215

 

Related Articles

  • Senate Panel Passes Transportation Bill, But Now the House Has Its Debate. Sanchez, Humberto // Bond Buyer;7/26/2002, Vol. 341 Issue 31436, p5 

    Reports the approval of transportation spending package for fiscal year 2003 by the U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee. Amount of the spending package; Allotment of budget for highway constructions; Impact of decline gas tax revenue on highway funding.

  • MICHIGAN Highway Matching Funds. Devitt, Caitlin // Bond Buyer;9/15/2010, Vol. 373 Issue 33383, p9 

    The article reports on the proposed transportation budget of Michigan, which includes 84 million dollars required to avoid losing the federal money in 2010.

  • Transport spending per head in London.  // Planning (14672073);11/18/2011, Issue 1922, p7 

    The article reports that expenditure on transportation in London, England rise to 774 pounds per head in 2010-2011 showing that it was the only English region with increased amount spent per head, according to Great Britain Treasury figures.

  • MISSOURI: Transportation Plan Slashed. Shields, Yvette // Bond Buyer;5/12/2010, Vol. 372 Issue 33315, p9 

    The article offers information on the 500 million dollars budget for the proposed five-year transportation improvement program in Missouri.

  • Major schemes retained in Comprehensive Spending Review.  // Rail Business Intelligence;10/28/2010, Issue 377, p1 

    The article reports that in the Comprehensive Spending Review announced in Great Britain on October 20, 2010 transport received the largest capital settlement that may go up to 30 billion pound over the period from 2011-12 to 2014-15.

  • BucureÅŸti transport funding.  // Railway Gazette International;Sep2016, Vol. 172 Issue 9, p20 

    The article reports on the transportation budget of the Romanian city of BucureÅŸti for 2016 which will be used mostly for the modernisation and procurement of trams.

  • Americans support infrastructure investment.  // American City & County;May2011, Vol. 126 Issue 5, p14 

    The article offers information on the "America THINKS" survey which revealed 74 percent of Americans willing to spend more on various transportation taxes if the government increases spending to repair the nation's roads, bridges, and transit systems.

  • State budget a pathetic effort.  // Business Journal Serving Fresno & the Central San Joaquin Valley;8/08/2003, Issue 323123, p24 

    Editorial. Comments on the budgeting processes in California. Lack of leadership at all levels of state government; Inclusion of bond to pay the state's pension plan; Transfer of highway and transportation funds.

  • Fate of road projects is in lawmakers' hands.  // Indianapolis Business Journal;3/11/2002, Vol. 22 Issue 53, p16 

    Editorial. Comments on the management of the fund road improvement projects in the Indiana Department of Transportation. Impact of the Federal cuts on the realization of the projects; Scrutiny on the tax restructuring to solve the road-funding scheme; Assessment of the target allocations proposed.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics