Aetna Swallows Its Pill

Cecil, Mark
November 2002
Mergers & Acquisitions Report;11/4/2002, Vol. 15 Issue 42, p3
Reports on the decision of Aetna Inc. in Hartford, Connecticut to remove its poison pill.


Related Articles

  • In an M&A-less Age, Holders Still Want Cos. to Swallow Pills. Cecil, Mark // Mergers & Acquisitions Report;7/15/2002, Vol. 15 Issue 27, p11 

    Reports on the data compiled by the Investor Responsibility Research Center on the vote of shareholders against poison pills.

  • Second generation of poison pills.  // Mergers & Acquisitions: The Dealermaker's Journal;Jul/Aug96, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p7 

    Reports that a number of public companies have served notice that they would not let their poison pills disintegrate. Extension of share purchase rights; Replacement of old programs with new provisions.

  • Anti-takeover legislation and the alternative of a poison pill. Robinson II, Russell M. // Business North Carolina;Jul96-Sup-Law Journal, Vol. 16 Issue 7, p8 

    Focuses on the need for a private corporation to adopt its own protection in the form of a shareholder rights plan or a `poison pill.' Application of the North Carolina Shareholder Protection Act (SPA) and the Control Share Acquisition Act (CSA) to public corporation; Poison pill's enhancement...

  • A new and improved brand of shark repellent. Daugherty, Patrick D. // Business North Carolina;Nov97 Supplement Law Journal, Vol. 17 Issue 11, p26 

    Describes the features of a typical first-generation poison-pill plan. Background information on the poison-pill plan; Benefits of the plan; Purpose of the plan; Information on the improvements to the architecture of the plan; Description of the poison-pill plan.

  • POISON PILLS--Preserving Shareholder Value. Cernius, William J. // Orange County Business Journal;11/02/98, Vol. 21 Issue 44, p13 

    Focuses on the preservation of shareholder value due to poison pills in California. Uncertainty regarding the equity markets; Design of rights plan; Opportunities from down-market for common stocks.

  • Robust comeback for poison pills.  // Mergers & Acquisitions: The Dealermaker's Journal;Mar/Apr95, Vol. 29 Issue 5, p8 

    Reports on the sudden explosion of poison pill installations in late 1994 and early 1995. Voting of more than 40 publicly traded companies in shareholder rights plans in late 1994 and early 1995; Examples of takeover offers that triggered the adoption of pills; Companies that voted on pills in...

  • Smaller firms opt for pill protection.  // Mergers & Acquisitions: The Dealermaker's Journal;Jan/Feb96, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p11 

    Focuses on the use of the poison pill strategy by small firms in the United States to avoid takeovers. Reasons; Names of companies installing pills in 1995.

  • What's your poison? Elliott, Heidi // Electronic News;09/21/98, Vol. 44 Issue 2237, p54 

    Discusses the use of so-called poison pills among public companies in the United States. Definition of poison pills; Example of a typical `flip in' plan; Provisions of the dead hand pill; Atmel Corp.'s decision to adopt a poison pill plan; Historical background of the poison pill.

  • Hostile corporate takeovers: Is the poison pill good medicine? Fuchs, Stanley // Business Forum;Winter90, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p6 

    Focuses on the poison pill as a defense against hostile corporate takeovers in the United States. Poison pill rights plans as a means of deterring bidders from purchasing control of a company; Judicial decisions.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics