TITLE

Developing Effective Research-Practice Partnerships for Creating a Culture of Evidence-Based Decision Making

AUTHOR(S)
Riemer, Manuel; Kelley, Susan; Casey, Susan; Taylor Haynes, Katherine
PUB. DATE
July 2012
SOURCE
Administration & Policy in Mental Health & Mental Health Service;Jul2012, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p248
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
With growing evidence that treatment as usual may have limited effectiveness in mental health the pressure on service providers to be accountable and produce evidence as to the effectiveness of their services has increased. Measurement Feedback Systems, such as the Contextualized Feedback System (CFS), have the potential to be powerful tools for service providers in assessing their own effectiveness at multiple levels with an organization. These systems represent an amalgamation of the data driven world of science and the experience driven world of clinical practice. However, the synthesis of these two worlds is not without significant challenges as these two very different cultures can easily clash. The key for successful collaboration in developing and implementing Measurement Feedback Systems is a good university-practice partnership that has a strong foundation in common goals and the positive relationships among its members. In addition, the partnership needs to be flexible so that it can adapt to new challenges and continuously grow with each obstacle. These are some of several lessons learned the authors of this article will share as part of their experience with developing and implementing CFS in one of the largest behavioral health service providers in the U.S.
ACCESSION #
77191063

 

Related Articles

  • Bringing Single-case Methodology into the Clinic to Enhance Evidence-based Practices. Tate, Robyn L.; Aird, Vanessa; Taylor, Christine // Brain Impairment;Dec2012, Vol. 13 Issue 3, p347 

    There are many challenges in incorporating an evidence-based approach into clinical practice and a large literature exists on various barriers and facilitators. Within this context, we have developed a framework to advocate an empirical approach to therapeutic interventions, using our Model to...

  • Beware of Over-Interpreting Negative Trials. Scahill, Lawrence; Aman, Michael G.; McCracken, James T.; McDougle, Christopher J.; Vitiello, Benedetto // Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders;Oct2008, Vol. 38 Issue 9, p1609 

    The article focuses on the pragmatic trial which addresses a problem of clinical decision-making. In its pure form, a pragmatic trial would compare two evidence-based treatments to help clinicians in selecting which one should be selected first. By contrast, an efficacy trial is designed to...

  • The Necessity of Randomized Clinical Trials. Jakobsen, Janus Christian; Gluud, Christian // British Journal of Medicine & Medical Research;Oct-Dec2013, Vol. 3 Issue 4, p1453 

    Aims: The hierarchy of evidence-based medicine determines the inferential powers of different clinical research designs. We want to address the difficult question if observational evidence under some circumstances can validate intervention effects. Methodology: Assessment of previous...

  • Inside the Belly of the Beast: How Bad Systems Trump Good Programs. McCarthy, Patrick; Kerman, Ben // Administration & Policy in Mental Health & Mental Health Service;Jan2010, Vol. 37 Issue 1/2, p167 

    In this article the authors discuss various problems related to implementation of evidence-based mental health services on large scale, as discussed in the articles published in the present issue of the journal. According to the authors, the articles highlight the need of largescale reforms to...

  • Considering Usual Medical Care in Clinical Trial Design. Dawson, Liza; Zarin, Deborah A.; Emanuel, Ezekiel J.; Friedman, Lawrence M.; Chaudhari, Bimal; Goodman, Steven N. // PLoS Clinical Trials;Sep2009, Vol. 6 Issue 9, Special section p1 

    The article focuses on the challenges of integrating conventional therapy in medical care to clinical trial design. It is said that difficulty in defining a comparison group may arise from disputes regarding interpretations of evidence. It claims that the lack of evidence-based recommendations...

  • Innovations in mental health services implementation: a report on state-level data from the U.S. Evidence-Based Practices Project. Magnabosco, Jennifer L. // Implementation Science;2006, Vol. 1, p13 

    Background: The Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Project has been investigating the implementation of evidence-based mental health practices (Assertive Community Treatment, Family Psychoeducation, Integrated Dual Diagnosis Treatment, Illness Management and Recovery, and Supported Employment) in...

  • Integrating Science and Engineering to Implement Evidence-Based Practices in Health Care Settings. Wu, Shinyi; Duan, Naihua; Wisdom, Jennifer; Kravitz, Richard; Owen, Richard; Sullivan, J.; Wu, Albert; Di Capua, Paul; Hoagwood, Kimberly // Administration & Policy in Mental Health & Mental Health Service;Sep2015, Vol. 42 Issue 5, p588 

    Integrating two distinct and complementary paradigms, science and engineering, may produce more effective outcomes for the implementation of evidence-based practices in health care settings. Science formalizes and tests innovations, whereas engineering customizes and optimizes how the innovation...

  • The Role of Infrastructure in the Transformation of Child–Adolescent Mental Health Systems. Stelk, Wayne; Slaton, Elaine // Administration & Policy in Mental Health & Mental Health Service;Jan2010, Vol. 37 Issue 1/2, p100 

    There is a widespread recognition that the mental health system is not effective in meeting the needs of the children, adolescents, and families who seek its services. In response to this recognition, researchers and policy makers are developing and implementing strategies to transform mental...

  • NATURE OF THE EVIDENCE BASE FOR EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH CARE. Schloss, Heather M.; Haaga, David A. F. // Journal of Cognitive & Behavioral Psychotherapies;Sep2005, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p207 

    Discusses the nature of the evidence base for evidence-based mental health care in the U.S. Concerns raised on the decision of psychotherapists regarding a treatment strategy; Forms of evidence related to the choice of treatment strategies, including the outcomes of randomized clinical trials;...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics