Judge Allows Anti-Renovation Groups To See Chicago Bears' Financial Data

Shields, Yvette
February 2002
Bond Buyer;2/26/2002, Vol. 339 Issue 31332, p32
Trade Publication
Reports that a protective order has been passed by a judge in a U.S. court ensuring that lawyers examining financial information from the football team Chicago Bears keep it confidential. Team's income projections for the renovated stadium; Details of the lawsuit challenging renovation of the stadium.


Related Articles

  • Confidentiality of Mediation. Zuckerman, Susan C. // Dispute Resolution Journal;Aug-Oct2000, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p92 

    Reviews the decision of the Supreme Court of Indiana on a case involving confidentiality of mediation. Background of the case; Basis of the court's decision.

  • What's New.  // ABA Journal;Jan1984, Vol. 70 Issue 1, p130 

    Focuses on court decisions and legal trends that may be of interest to lawyers, current as of January 1984. Treatment of confidential documents that lawyers sent to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on behalf of their clients; Right of police looking for a suspect to enter and search...

  • Maintaining privilege over legal advice given by in-house lawyers. Bennett, Susan // Keeping Good Companies (14447614);Dec2010, Vol. 62 Issue 11, p644 

    The article discusses court decisions related to in-house legal advice which may not be privileged communication in Australia and Europe. It defines privileged communication as a confidential one made between a lawyer and their client for the purpose of providing legal advice to the client. An...

  • Notes and Recent Decisions. Miller, Charles M.; Weiser, Howard M.; Dutton, John J.; Siegel, Howard A.; Berkman, William R.; St. Clair, Sheldon C.; Walkley, David D.; Nelson, Alan C.; Cowan, Bruce M. // California Law Review;Mar1957, Vol. 45 Issue 1, p66 

    Discusses court decisions in the U.S. Priorities in the distribution of an insolvent's estate pursuant to a common law assignment for benefit of creditors; Intent required in bigamy and other offenses; Confidential communications between an attorney and his client.

  • The sanctity of peer review upheld. Sfikas, Peter M. // Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA);Feb2005, Vol. 136 Issue 2, p233 

    Discusses a case heard in the Georgia federal court in which the sanctity of the peer review was upheld by the judge. Confidentiality provisions of a typical peer review statute; Test that federal courts apply in deciding whether to permit discovery of peer review documents; Conclusions reached...

  • Statements to School Counselor Not Protected, Mich. Court Rules. Walsh, Mark; Galley, Michelle // Education Week;2/27/2002, Vol. 21 Issue 24, p9 

    Reports on the ruling of a Michigan appeals court that statements made by two students to a school counselor about the sexual assault of a female student were not protected by teacher-student confidentiality. Statement that students' conversations with school counselors are generally...

  • Judge denies Ticketus preferential treatment in Glasgow Rangers case. Salih, Chris // Fundweb;3/26/2012, p10 

    The article reports that a judge has declined to give Ticketus preferential treatment as a creditor of Glasgow Rangers Football Club. The Ticketus deal, in which the firm offered Rangers working capital in exchange for future season ticket sales, allowed Craig Whyte to pay off the Ibrox club's...

  • What are your Staff doing With data?  // People Management;Jun2014, p17 

    The article discusses a court case involving Warm Zones, a company which campaigns against fuel poverty, regarding its confidentiality clause. It discusses the importance of confidential commercial information to businesses, the access to householder data by two employees, the coverage of their...

  • High Court tightens rule on confidentiality.  // GP: General Practitioner;11/10/2006, p17 

    The article reports on a High Court ruling regarding patients' rights to confidentiality in Great Britain. In relation to the court case of two London, England-based solicitors, the High Court ruled that maintaining medical confidentiality is a core legal right of a patient according to the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics