TITLE

Whither Freedom of the Press?

AUTHOR(S)
Bezanson, Randall P.
PUB. DATE
May 2012
SOURCE
Iowa Law Review;May2012, Vol. 97 Issue 4, p1259
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article offers information on the freedom of the press in citizens united. It mentions the Supreme Court of rejecting the advice of institutional press having constitutional privilege. It includes Eugene Volokh, professor, of elaborating the perspective of freedom of press being institutional or technological. It considers press to be a technology rather another voice and adds press to be an essential voice with a purpose and requiring a democratic self-government
ACCESSION #
76165259

 

Related Articles

  • Citizens Divided: Campaign Finance Reform, Deliberative Democracy, and Citizens United. Heresco, Aaron // Democratic Communiqué;Fall2012, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p22 

    The January 21, 2010 Supreme Court decision in the case of Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (FEC) fundamentally altered the role of corporations in the U.S political system. Upending over one hundred years of judicial precedent, this 5-4 ruling lifted previously establish limits on...

  • Is the Citizens United Decision Hurting Democracy?  // U.S. News Digital Weekly;9/24/2010, Vol. 2 Issue 38, p11 

    The author comments on whether the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission affects U.S. democracy. In the case, the Court ruled that companies can spend money on political campaigns. The author believes that the ruling does not affect...

  • Citizens United: Democracy Realized--or Defeated? Wade, Margaret E. // Minnesota Law Review;2012, Vol. 96 Issue 5, p1639 

    An introduction is presented in which the Symposium Articles Editor discusses various aspects of the relationship between law and politics in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, including concerns about free speech and democracy.

  • Get Money Out of Politics.  // Tikkun;Winter2013, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p7 

    The author focuses on the movement in the U.S. to get money out of politics. He asserts that democracy is undermined by the use money by candidates during elections. He recalls the so-called Citizens United decision of the Supreme Court to strike down an act that aims to limit the amount of...

  • The Impact of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission on National Elections in the U.S. Schmitz, Zachary // LOGOS: A Journal of Undergraduate Research;Fall2013, Vol. 6, p33 

    In 2010, the Supreme Court of the United States, in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, began a trend of liberalizing campaign finance laws throughout the United States. The decision itself was widely criticized by the press, academia, and politicians, who all claimed that fewer...

  • Citizens United, States Divided: An Empirical Analysis of Independent Political Spending. SPENCER, DOUGLAS M.; WOOD, ABBY ?. // Indiana Law Journal;Winter2014, Vol. 89 Issue 1, p315 

    What effect has Citizens United v. FEC had on independent spending in American politics? Previous attempts to answer this question have focused solely on federal elections, where there is no baseline for comparing changes in spending behavior. We overcome this limitation by examining the effects...

  • Is the Citizens United Decision Hurting Democracy? Waldman, Michael // U.S. News Digital Weekly;9/24/2010, Vol. 2 Issue 38, p11 

    The author comments on whether the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission affects U.S. democracy. In the case, the Court ruled that companies can spend money on political campaigns. The author believes that the ruling affects democracy in...

  • LETTERS TO THE EDITOR. Denier, Richard J.; Abarr, Maurice L. // California Farmer;Jan2013, Vol. 296 Issue 1, p12 

    Two letters to the editor are presented in response to articles "How we've lost trust in government," in the November, 2012 issue which highlights benefits derived by the bank JPMorgan Chase from the "Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act" and "The threat to democracy’s sea wall," in the...

  • Death by a Thousand Cuts: How the Supreme Court Has Effectively Killed Campaign Finance Regulation by Its Limited Recognition of Compelling State Interests. HUGUELET, KEVIN R. // University of Miami Law Review;Fall2015, Vol. 70 Issue 1, p348 

    This Article examines the current campaign finance jurisprudence in the United States, with a particular emphasis on the Court's recognition of compelling state interests. Given the limited recognition of compelling state interests, this Article seeks to question the seemingly arbitrary...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics