The Expert Witness as Teacher: How a "Neutral" Tutorial Can Enhance a Jury's Understanding of Your Case

Jaroslaw, David; Michael, Wendy
January 2012
FDCC Quarterly;Winter2012, Vol. 62 Issue 2, p156
Academic Journal
The article presents information on the modern litigation and the importance of expert witnesses' examination in the case of securities, commercial and tort trials. The role of expert witness in educating the jurors when dealing with unfamiliar subjects and the rules of evidence that governs expert testimony are discussed. The advantages of a court-appointed, third-party expert in improving credibility are also discussed.


Related Articles

  • Roles and responsibilities of medical expert witnesses. Friston, Mark // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);8/6/2005, Vol. 331 Issue 7512, p305 

    Presents an editorial discussing the roles and responsibilities of medical expert witnesses in civil litigation in the United Kingdom. Review of how lawyers in civil litigation are usually required to instruct and consult with only a single joint medical expert; Responsibilities of the joint...

  • COST-EFFECTIVE PRESENTATION OF TESTIMONY. WALKER, MARGARET E. // Family Advocate;Fall2013, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p36 

    The article offers information on inexpensive methods of presenting testimonies in courts in the U.S. The author suggests that lawyers must use telephone deposition, Skype, FaceTime or telephone deposition as evidences. Moreover, she also mentioned other ways of utilizing well prepared discovery...

  • Contradicting the witness. McCOY, JOHN V. // LP/Gas;Nov2014, Vol. 74 Issue 11, p45 

    The article offers information on the importance of expert opinion in supporting court evidences. The author states that scientific and factual evidences are significant in providing support to the opinionated views of experts because there are situations where expert opinions are inconsistent...

  • Effects of Expert Psychological Advice on Human Performance in Judging the Validity of Eyewitness Testimony. Wells, Gary L.; Lindsay, R. C. L.; Tousignant, J. P. // Law & Human Behavior (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.);1980, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p275 

    A review is made of recent experimental research regarding how well human observers can judge the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. It is concluded that people: (a) may be overwilling to believe in the accuracy of eyewitnesses' memory; (b) rely too heavily on the confidence of eyewitnesses in...

  • SHARK WEEK. AYOOB, MASSAD // Guns Magazine;Mar2014, Vol. 60 Issue 3, p14 

    A personal narrative is presented which explores the author's experience of being an expert witness in a weapons murder case.

  • Demonstrative Evidence. Clark, Shannon L. // Facts & Findings;Mar/Apr2013, Vol. 39 Issue 5, p29 

    The article discusses the use of demonstrative evidence in trials particularly in the U.S. According to the author, demonstrative evidence enables jurors to visually process evidence. The two categories of demonstrative evidence are described, namely, real and illustrative. The admissibility of...

  • Neuroscientists in court. Jones, Owen D.; Wagner, Anthony D.; Faigman, David L.; Raichle, Marcus E. // Nature Reviews Neuroscience;Oct2013, Vol. 14 Issue 10, p730 

    Neuroscientific evidence is increasingly being offered in court cases. Consequently, the legal system needs neuroscientists to act as expert witnesses who can explain the limitations and interpretations of neuroscientific findings so that judges and jurors can make informed and appropriate...

  • Can't We All Just Play By "The Rule"? Sequestering Witnesses During Pretrial Discovery. Moberly, Michael D. // American Journal of Trial Advocacy;Oct2009, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p447 

    Truthfulness is as critical during pretrial proceedings as it is at trial. After a brieflook at the evolution of sequestering witnesses, Mr. Moberly applies to pretrial discovery priceedings the logic of sequestering witnesses during trial testimony. He provides extensive research and discussion...

  • Experts Cannot Be Shielded from Discovery by Redesignation. Harris, M. Derek // Litigation News;Spring2013, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p19 

    The article discusses the court case Para vs. Anderson wherein the Arizona Court of Appeals permitted discovery from a testifying expert who was redesignated as a consultant. The court has also rejected the reinstatement of privileges and discovery protections that apply to consulting experts...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics