TITLE

The Self-Critical Analysis Privilege: It is Time For Formal Adoption

AUTHOR(S)
Reeg, Kurtis B.; Temper, Matthew A.
PUB. DATE
September 2011
SOURCE
FDCC Quarterly;Fall2011, Vol. 62 Issue 1, p80
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reflects on self-critical analysis to shield self-critical documents from discovery in lawsuits. It discusses the history of self-critical analysis privilege and its application in various areas including governmental agency claims, aviation related claims and securities claims. It informs self-critical analysis to evaluate compliance with law and monitor and provide public good in safety, a clean environment, and equal opportunities in employment.
ACCESSION #
76131404

 

Related Articles

  • Sarbanes- Oxley Fails To Slow Fraud.  // Business Finance;Sep2005, Vol. 11 Issue 9, p9 

    This article presents information on issues concerning failure of Sarbanes-Oxley Act in controlling fraud in the U.S. government offices. Of securities cases filed in 2004, 59 percent contained one or more allegations of accounting irregularities. The median settlement value in those lawsuits...

  • Don't Let Regulators' Zeal Ruin Companies and Careers. Ludwig, Eugene A. // American Banker;6/20/2003, Vol. 168 Issue 118, p7 

    Given the magnitude of cases of Enron Corp. and WorldCom Inc., formal actions the regulators have taken in these cases are completely warranted. But, the current atmosphere could result in regulators treating less serious transgressions with excessive passion. Protection of the public in...

  • Optimal Trust Design in Mass Tort Bankruptcy. Ayotte, Kenneth; Listokin, Yair // American Law & Economics Review;Fall2005, Vol. 7 Issue 2, p403 

    Many firms have filed for bankruptcy to manage mass tort liabilities, most notably asbestos producers. We model a bankruptcy procedure that optimally balances the liquidity needs of present claimants and an uncertain number of future claimants. We find that future claimants should receive...

  • The Buck Stops with You. Stein, Craig D.; Pinsky, Joshua S.; Cohen, Jonathan P. // Trusts & Estates;Feb2006, Vol. 145 Issue 2, p42 

    The article discusses the issue when a trust suffers investment losses due to misconduct of investment advisor or securities brokers. It claims that although trustees are not expected to have complete knowledge of securities litigation or evaluate a securities claim thoroughly, it is within...

  • Hacking Discovered, Losses Not Covered. Rutkin, Alan // Best's Review;May2014, Vol. 115 Issue 1, p90 

    The article discusses claims process associated with loss brought by computer hacking, which is best explained in the case Metro Brokers v. Transportation Insurance Co. where the policyholder made an insurance claim over data loss it suffered after hackers learned the credentials for the...

  • Living in a Litigious World Demands Defensive Asset Protection. Mandell, David B.; Halloran, Michael // AUANews;Jun2007, Vol. 12 Issue 6, p23 

    The article offers suggestions to limit exposure to litigation in the U.S. Nearly 20 million new civil lawsuits will be filed in 2007 in the state and federal court systems. Litigation is a serious threat to financial security. It explains why people sue so often. Reducing liability exposure by...

  • THE BELOVED COUNTRY. Asmal, Kader // Finweek;5/6/2010, p55 

    The author discusses the move of the financial regulatory bodies in the U.S. and Great Britain to take some kind of civil action against Goldman Sachs & Co. Accordingly, the company has been notorious for paying its executive exorbitant salaries and benefits. The U.S. Securities and Exchange...

  • ASIC'S success in court. Skeffington, Robert // BRW;11/13/2003, Vol. 25 Issue 44, p15 

    Reports on the success of the Australian Securities & Investments Commission's litigation attempts in 2002-03, according to its annual report.

  • Forward-Casting 10b-5 Damages: A Comparison to Other Methods. Ferrell, Allen; Saha, Atanu // Journal of Corporation Law;Winter2012, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p365 

    The article discusses litigation matters involving the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC's) anti-fraud Rule 10b-5 as of January 2012, focusing on an analysis of several methods of calculating damages under Rule 10b-5, including a proposed forward-casting method. The constant dollar...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics