TITLE

Handling Liability and Coverage Claims: Splitting Files, the Duty to Defend, and Ethical Considerations for Lawyers

AUTHOR(S)
Currie, Jr., Edward "Ned"; Gill, Joseph W.; Farnan, John G.; Faust, Laura "Megan"
PUB. DATE
September 2011
SOURCE
FDCC Quarterly;Fall2011, Vol. 62 Issue 1, p51
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article offers discussion on the ways of handling liability and coverage claims of insurer. It explains the effective ways of management of conflicts of interest to the insurers and defense counsel. It overviews the ethical considerations for defense counsel and explains the prevention of conflicts of interests by splitting of file. It states that the insurance carrier is judged on the basis of addressing of any conflicts of interest.
ACCESSION #
76131403

 

Related Articles

  • A Dangerous New Twist in the Tripartite Relationship. Randall, Karen Painter // Professional Liability Litigation @lert;Fall2012, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p6 

    The article offers information on the relationship between insurers, insured person, and defense counsel retained by the insurer to defend the insured against third-party claims. It informs that the relationship can present actual or potential conflicts between the insurer and the insured. It...

  • Ontario insurers can exclude criminal acts without being required to show criminal intent.  // Canadian Underwriter;Mar2007, Vol. 74 Issue 3, p66 

    The article focuses on the ruling of the Ontario Court of Appeal allowing insurance companies to exclude coverage for liability on the basis of criminal acts regardless of whether or not the criminal act was intentional. It cites the benefits of the decision to the insurance industry. It...

  • Insurance Companies Liable for Acid Pits.  // Claims;Aug2005, Vol. 53 Issue 8, p68 

    Reports on the ruling of a federal court on a case regarding a claim filed by the state of California in 1993 against insurance companies. Liability of insurance companies in the cleanup of a toxic waste site referred to as the Stringefellow Acid Pitts; Arguments presented by lawyers for the...

  • The Tripartite Relationship of Insurance Defense Counsel. McLain, J. Anthony // Alabama Lawyer;Mar2013, Vol. 74 Issue 2, p138 

    The article provides an answer to a question related to conflict of interest between insurance companies.

  • In Brief.  // Business Insurance;6/23/2008, Vol. 42 Issue 25, p1 

    This section offers news briefs related to the business insurance industry in the U.S. According to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, lower courts should consider an insurer's potential conflict of interest when reviewing a denial of employee benefits in which the insurer both determines and pays the...

  • CICA Still Fuming Over Captive Slight. McDonald, Caroline // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;9/16/2002, Vol. 106 Issue 37, p27 

    Reports the controversy of Standard & Poor's comments referring to the growth in captive insurance in the U.S. Vulnerability of corporate income statements; Differences in the opinion about the captive industry; Arguments of Captive Insurance Companies Association to the statements of Standard...

  • Prepare a strong defense against liability risk. Nalty, Sean P. // Best's Review / Life-Health Insurance Edition;Sep96, Vol. 97 Issue 5, p82 

    Focuses on the need for insurance companies to prepare a strong defense against liability risk in the United States. Avoiding the appearance of impropriety; Formulating a policy surrender proposal; Test of reasonableness; Need to discuss the policy's critical terms.

  • Queens Judge Interprets Rights Of No-Fault Accident Victim To Assign Medical Claim To Provider.  // Insurance Advocate;12/16/2000, Vol. 111 Issue 50, p11 

    Focuses on a no-fault lawsuit in which an insurer cannot deny liability to a medical provider that had been assigned the claim by the victim of an automobile accident. Reason of no-fault insurer GEICO for refusing to pay the provider; Argument raised by GEICO in civil court.

  • Ill. tort reform provision declared unconstitutional. Lonkevich, Dan // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;11/11/96, Vol. 100 Issue 46, p3 

    Presents information on the product liability statute in Illinois' tort reform law which was considered unconstitutional by a Cook County, Illinois Circuit Court, and looks at the effect it will have on insurers. Information on the case Glennon versus Owens Illinois Incorporated; Indepth look...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics