Dixon, Rosalind
March 2011
University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law;Mar2011, Vol. 13 Issue 3, p643
Academic Journal
The article discusses the court case Frontiero v. Richardson regarding the questioning of the constitutional interpretation and its definition by the Supreme Court of the U.S. with reference to the common law and the democratic constitutional understandings. Partial amendments like the Equal Rights Amendment passed by the judges provide information on the democratic constitutional understandings. Information on the impact of the court's decision on the legal interpretation is also presented.


Related Articles

  • TOWARD A CONSTITUTIONAL CHEVRON: LESSONS FROM RAPANOS. Brader, Cory Ruth // University of Pennsylvania Law Review;Apr2012, Vol. 160 Issue 5, p1479 

    No abstract available.

  • CONSTITUTIONAL AMBIGUITIES AND ORIGINALISM: LESSONS FROM THE SPENDING POWER. Baker, Lynn A. // Northwestern University Law Review;2009 Special Issue, Vol. 103 Issue 2, p495 

    In this article, the author proposes a canon of interpretation for courts facing ambiguities in the U.S. Constitution. She discusses the observation that the ultimate arbiter of the meaning of the Constitution is a supermajority of the states acting pursuant to amendment procedures under Article...

  • DEATH, DESUETUDE, AND ORIGINAL MEANING. STINNEFORD, JOHN F. // William & Mary Law Review;Nov2014, Vol. 56 Issue 2, p531 

    One of the most common objections to originalism is that it cannot cope with cultural change. One of the most commonly invoked examples of this claimed weakness is the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause, whose original meaning would (it is argued) authorize barbaric punishment practices like...

  • Searches and Stale Law, Plus a Look at Coming Attractions. Stadnyk, Sophia M. // State & Local Law News;Summer2008, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p12 

    The article discusses the appealed case concerning the Supreme Court's decision to an issue on the admissibility of evidence which was obtained inherent to a lawful arrest. In considering the decision of Virginia court and re-appreciation of the facts of the case, the Supreme Court reversed and...

  • Fundamental, but Not Fundamental Enough: Missouri's Balancing Test in the Area of Parental Rights. Walsh, Nichole // Missouri Law Review;2010, Vol. 75 Issue 2, p641 

    The article focuses on the balancing of interest test process on the legality of parental rights in the Missouri. It cites the case Weigand v. Edwards detailing the constitutionality of the Supreme Court's decision in dealing with child custody based on the state's Revised Statute section...

  • Guinn and Beal v. United States (1915). Wynn, Linda T. // Freedom Facts & Firsts: 400 Years of the African American Civil ;2009, p175 

    Information about the case of Guinn and Beal v. United States is presented. In the case, U.S. Supreme Court ruled that voter registration requirements containing grandfather clauses violated the Fifteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court found that the Oklahoma law was...

  • YOU'VE COME A LONG WAY, BABY: REHNQUIST'S NEW APPROACH TO PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION IN HIBBS. Siegel, Reva B. // Stanford Law Review;Apr2006, Vol. 58 Issue 6, p1871 

    The article offers a look at the sex discrimination opinion of the late U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist in the court case Nevada Department of Human Resources versus Hibbs. The stance of Rehnquist on the Equal Rights Amendment while serving in the Nixon Justice Department is...

  • The First Congress Canon and the Supreme Court's Use of History. Bhargava, Michael // California Law Review;Dec2006, Vol. 94 Issue 6, p1745 

    The article focuses on the significance of the use of the First Congress canon by the Supreme Court in the U.S. The paper traces the history of such action dating back in 1803 with the Stuart v. Laird case. It analyzes the problem of finding acquiescence and suggests why apparent submission to...

  • UNREASONABLE CALCULATIONS OF "REASONABLE" FEES: PERDUE V. KENNY A. EX REL. WINN AND THE SUPREME COURT'S ONGOING STRUGGLE WITH 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Olin, Kristin A.C. // Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review;2011, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p1113 

    The article offers information about the U.S. Supreme Court case Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel Winn which related to attorney's fees. It provides analysis of the legal issues of laws about attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, the interpretation of the law by the Court, and potential changes to...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics