TITLE

A Randomized Trial of Urodynamic Testing before Stress-Incontinence Surgery

AUTHOR(S)
Nager, Charles W.; Brubaker, Linda; Litman, Heather J.; Zyczynski, Halina M.; Varner, R. Edward; Amundsen, Cindy; Sirls, Larry T.; Norton, Peggy A.; Arisco, Amy M.; Chai, Toby C.; Zimmern, Philippe; Barber, Matthew D.; Dandreo, Kimberly J.; Menefee, Shawn A.; Kenton, Kimberly; Lowder, Jerry; Richter, Holly E.; Khandwala, Salil; Nygaard, Ingrid; Kraus, Stephen R.
PUB. DATE
May 2012
SOURCE
New England Journal of Medicine;5/24/2012, Vol. 366 Issue 21, p1987
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Urodynamic studies are commonly performed in women before surgery for stress urinary incontinence, but there is no good evidence that they improve outcomes. Methods: We performed a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial involving women with uncomplicated, demonstrable stress urinary incontinence to compare outcomes after preoperative office evaluation and urodynamic tests or evaluation only. The primary outcome was treatment success at 12 months, defined as a reduction in the score on the Urogenital Distress Inventory of 70% or more and a response of �much better� or �very much better� on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement. The predetermined noninferiority margin was 11 percentage points. Results: A total of 630 women were randomly assigned to undergo office evaluation with urodynamic tests or evaluation only (315 per group); the proportion in whom treatment was successful was 76.9% in the urodynamic-testing group versus 77.2% in the evaluation-only group (difference, -0.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -7.5 to 6.9), which was consistent with noninferiority. There were no significant between-group differences in secondary measures of incontinence severity, quality of life, patient satisfaction, rates of positive provocative stress tests, voiding dysfunction, or adverse events. Women who underwent urodynamic tests were significantly less likely to receive a diagnosis of overactive bladder and more likely to receive a diagnosis of voiding-phase dysfunction, but these changes did not lead to significant between-group differences in treatment selection or outcomes. Conclusions: For women with uncomplicated, demonstrable stress urinary incontinence, preoperative office evaluation alone was not inferior to evaluation with urodynamic testing for outcomes at 1 year. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00803959.)
ACCESSION #
75987854

 

Related Articles

  • NIH: Urodynamics before SUI surgery may be unnecessary.  // Urology Times;Jun2012, Vol. 40 Issue 7, p10 

    The article provides information on the insignificance of urodynamic studies in women before stress urinary incontinence surgery.

  • Bladder Testing.  // JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association;6/27/2012, Vol. 307 Issue 24, p2578 

    The article presents information on the requirement of an invasive bladder test called urodynamic testing process carried out prior to the surgical treatment in the case of treating uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence in women.

  • Patient satisfaction after retropubic and transobturator slings: first assessment using the Incontinence Outcome Questionnaire (IOQ). Betschart, Cornelia; Scheiner, David; Hess, Eva; Seifert, Burkhardt; Fink, Daniel; Perucchini, Daniele // International Urogynecology Journal;Jul2011, Vol. 22 Issue 7, p805 

    Introduction and hypothesis: The aim of the Incontinence Outcome Questionnaire (IOQ) is to assess quality of life and patient-reported outcome after midurethral slings. Methods: In this retrospective study, 626 patients with a minimum follow-up period of 1 year were sent the IOQ. Four hundred...

  • Unexpected benefits and potential therapeutic opportunities of tension free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence. Madhu, Chendrimada; Harber, Penelope; Holmes, David // Urogynaecologia;2013, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p14 

    Urinary incontinence is a debilitating problem in women with significant effects on quality of life. The tension free vaginal tape (TVT) improves urinary symptoms and achieves a high rate of patient satisfaction. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of TVT on vaginal symptoms, pelvic...

  • Stress incontinence surgeries are not equivalent in all ways.  // Contemporary OB/GYN;Aug2010, Vol. 55 Issue 8, p11 

    The probes into a study, which indicated that women do not find retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings subjectively equivalent and that complication rates vary.

  • Transobturator Tape for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Preoperative Valsalva Leak Point Pressure Is Not Related to Cure Rate or Quality of Life Improvement. Je-Guk Ryu; Seong Hyeon Yu; Se Heon Jeong; Bu Hyeon Yun; Ho Song Yu; Sun-Ouck Kim; Dongdeuk Kwon // Korean Journal of Urology;Apr2014, Vol. 55 Issue 4, p265 

    Purpose: We investigated whether the Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) is valuable for predicting postoperative outcome measurement after transobturator suburethral tape (TVT-O) implantation for treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. Materials and Methods: A total of 204 female...

  • A modified inexpensive transobturator vaginal tape inside-out procedure versus tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of SUI: a prospective comparative study. Chen, Xinliang; Tong, Xiaowen; Jiang, Min; Li, Huaifang; Qiu, Jin; Shao, Lingyun; Yang, Xiang // Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics;Dec2011, Vol. 284 Issue 6, p1461 

    Purpose: To prospectively compare, in terms of efficacy and safety, the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and our modified transobturator vaginal tape inside-out (TVT-O) procedure with self-tailored monofilament macroporous polypropylene mesh for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods: A total...

  • Preop Urodynamics for SUI Questioned.  // Renal & Urology News;Jul2012, Vol. 11 Issue 7, p26 

    The article reports on the significance of performing preoperative urodynamic investigations in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI), which was raised on the findings from the Value of Urodynamics prior to Stress Incontinence Surgery (VUSIS) study.

  • Urodynamic assessment of urinary incontinence. Housley, Sarah L.; Harding, Chris; Pickard, Robert // Indian Journal of Urology;Apr-Jun2010, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p215 

    Context: Urodynamic evaluation in the assessment of women complaining of urinary incontinence remains controversial with recent UK National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence guidance maintaining that it is unnecessary prior to surgery for women with a primarily stress leakage. Other...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics