Against Liberty: Adorno, Levinas and the Pathologies of Freedom

Nelson, Eric S.
June 2012
Theoria: A Journal of Social & Political Theory;6/14/2012, Vol. 59 Issue 131, p64
Academic Journal
Adorno and Levinas argue from distinct yet intersecting perspectives that there are pathological forms of freedom, formed by systems of power and economic exchange, which legitimate the neglect, exploitation and domination of others. In this paper, I examine how the works of Adorno and Levinas assist in diagnosing the aporias of liberty in contemporary capitalist societies by providing critical models and strategies for confronting present discourses and systems of freedom that perpetuate unfreedom such as those ideologically expressed in possessive individualist and libertarian conceptions of freedom.


Related Articles

  • ¿Más allá del capital y del Estado? Cuatro pro(a)puestas por la vida y un comentario…. Ramírez, Mónica Gallegos // Desacatos;2011, Issue 37, p81 

    The author considers negative aspects of a capitalist social structure as it pertains to Latin American countries. She maintains that capitalism creates an oppressive society in which everything is centered around money. She also comments on the importance of highlighting and promoting...

  • THE DECLINE OF THE INDIVIDUAL. Rickover, H. G. // Saturday Evening Post;3/30/1963, Vol. 236 Issue 12, p11 

    Postulates some factors that have conspired to diminish the freedom and dignity of the individual, thereby threatening the concept of democracy. Replacement of the Protestant ethic by the so-called Freudian ethic; Utilization of science for practical purposes that has enormous potential for the...

  • THE CIVILIZATION-BUILDING ROLE OF THE NUCLEAR FAMILY IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE. Berger, Brigitte // International Journal on World Peace;Jun98, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p21 

    The family is the basic building block upon which other social forms rest. Anthropologists have counted close to 2,000 forms of family systems. In the West, the nuclear family provided democratic capitalist societies with their organizing principles and moral charter. Today, under the banners of...

  • Individual Liberty and Self-Determination. Macioce, Fabio // Libertarian Papers;12/ 1/2011, Vol. 3 Issue 31-38, p1 

    The article offers information on the principles and boundaries of self-determination and individual liberty. It presents the discrepancies and praxis of practical liberty. It mentions impediments, facts and constraints on libertarianism. Moreover, it features the fundamental rights to freedom,...

  • TOWARD A THEORY OF STATE CAPITALIST DEVELOPMENT IN THE THIRD WORLD. Berberoglu, Berch // International Review of Modern Sociology;Jan1979, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p17 

    This paper attempts to make a contribution to the development of a general theory of slate capitalism in the Third World. After a brief discussion of (lie three major positions on this question, an alternative theory that would more closely correspond to the actual dynamics of Third World state...

  • Why Socialism? Einstein, Albert // Monthly Review: An Independent Socialist Magazine;May2004, Vol. 56 Issue 1, p44 

    Discusses issues concerning the concept of socialism. Purpose of socialism; Reason economic anarchy of the capitalist society is the source of problem; Principles which characterize the economy based on the private ownership of capital; Result of technological development and increasing...

  • Toward a political economy of inheritance: Community and household among the Mennonites. Longhofer, Jeffrey // Theory & Society;Jun93, Vol. 22 Issue 3, p337 

    This article demonstrates that similar inheritance practices were found within two different social formations: one with a mixture of feudal and capitalist social relations (Russia) and the other strictly capitalist (U.S.), and argues that even though partible and impartible practices were found...

  • THE PROBLEMS AND POTENTIAL OF AFFLUENCE AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR THE LEFT PROJECT. Dow, Geoff // Social Alternatives;2004 First Quarter, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p12 

    Capitalism has delivered affluence and, to a lesser extent, freedoms in rich countries. The Left has never denied this. It was explicit in Marx's political economy in the 1860's that the social conditions that defined a capitalist society — exploitative and morally objectionable though...

  • EL FETICHISMO Y LA COSIFICACIÓN DE LAS RELACIONES SOCIALES EN EL SISTEMA CAPITALISTA. Ruiz Sanjuán, César // Praxis Filosofica;ago-dic2011, Issue 33, p191 

    The aim of this paper is to analyze the meaning of fetishism within Marxist theory in order to show the potential of this dimension of Marxist theory for the critique of the social relations of the capitalist system. The historical specificity of capitalist society is that all relations are...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics