TITLE

Thresholds of Discomfort for Complex Stimuli: Acoustic and Sound-Quality Predictors

AUTHOR(S)
Warner, Rebecca L.; Bentler, Ruth A.
PUB. DATE
October 2002
SOURCE
Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Oct2002, Vol. 45 Issue 5, p1016
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to explain differences in threshold of discomfort (TD) across complex stimuli using acoustic and sound-quality variables as predictors. Two 4-tone complexes and 10 environmental sounds were used as stimuli. The environmental sounds consisted of a baby crying, hairdryer blowing, glass breaking, jet engine propelling, person laughing, motorcycle accelerating, orchestra tuning, telephone ringing, siren blowing, and toilet flushing. One-third octave band (1/3 OB) spectra were obtained for the 12 stimuli, with overall rms amplitude held constant across the stimuli. Nine acoustic quantities describing the high-and low-frequency content, peakiness, and bandwidth of each 1/3 OB spectrum were defined. Twenty adult subjects, 6 men and 14 women, with normal hearing sensitivity participated in the study. TDs were obtained from each subject for all of the stimuli. In addition, subjects rated each of the stimuli for annoyance, harshness, loudness, noisiness, and tinniness on a 10-point scale. These ratings were completed at a level 10 dB below each subject's TD for that stimulus. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used to estimate the amount of variance in TDs accounted for by subject differences, defined acoustic properties, and sound-quality ratings. Results indicated that, after controlling for intersubject differences, acoustic and sound-quality factors significantly influenced TD ratings. Increases in high-frequency cutoff and low-frequency cutoff, as well as higher ratings of loudness and annoyance, were associated with higher TDs. Associated with lower TDs were an increase in the frequency of the primary spectral peak, an increase in the number of spectral peaks, an increase in the center frequency, an increase in the area under the frequency response curve 30 dB down from the peak amplitude, an increase in the calculated loudness level re ANSI S3.4-1980, and higher ratings of tinniness.
ACCESSION #
7506288

 

Related Articles

  • Fast fact.  // Science World;02/21/97, Vol. 53 Issue 10, p4 

    Presents trivia about sound and hearing. Measurement of air pressure created by sound waves; Result of listening to loud music; Sound waves of blaring dance.

  • Show What You Know.  // Weekly Reader - Edition 2;Apr2011, Vol. 80, Special section p4 

    A quiz about hearing and sound is presented.

  • How ear cells switch on sound. Coghlan, Andy // New Scientist;9/21/96, Vol. 151 Issue 2048, p15 

    Explains the mechanism of how sound waves reach the inner ear via the ear drum and the three tiny bones of the middle ear. Signals' production of vibrations in the fluid surrounding the cochlea; Vitality of the hair cells in hearing; Implication of the mechanism on the development of drugs that...

  • Ocker stopper.  // New Scientist;11/21/2009, Vol. 204 Issue 2735, p80 

    This section provides answers to a question about the word cooee being more audible over distance.

  • Preferred overall loudness. 1: Sound field presentation in the laboratory. Smeds, K. // Noise & Vibration Worldwide;May2008, Vol. 39 Issue 5, p34 

    The article reports on the findings of a research related to preferred overall loudness using a wide dynamic range compression (WDRC) hearing aids. The study involves 24 hearing-impaired and 15 normal-hearing participants. The participants watched and listened to video sequences and rated the...

  • Preferred overall loudness. II: Listening through hearing aids in field and laboratory tests. Smeds, K. // Noise & Vibration Worldwide;May2008, Vol. 39 Issue 5, p34 

    The article reports on the findings of a research related to preferred overall loudness using a hearing aid. The study involves 15 hearing-impaired and eight normal-hearing participants. Results show that the normal-hearing participants prefer close to normal overall loudness while...

  • Do You Really Mean …. Keasbey, William P. // Saturday Evening Post;10/12/1946, Vol. 219 Issue 15, p157 

    The article rates several sounds according to the number of decibels in the U.S. A decibel is the smallest difference in loudness distinguishable by the human ear. A soft thud of a heartbeat rates ten decibels. A soft lover-like whisper rates about eighteen decibels. Moreover, an ordinary...

  • Acoustic Basis of Tuning Fork Tests. Hussain, Abdulmohsen E.; Blakley, Brian W.; Buelow, Bruce; Schilling, Heather // Journal of Otolaryngology;Nov/Dec2001, Vol. 30 Issue 6, p347 

    Objectives: To obtain pilot data to determine the feasibility of supporting or refuting a theory regarding lateralization of sound in conductive hearing loss and to describe the application of this theory to other tuning fork tests. Design: Controlled audiometric testing with and without a...

  • On the Interaction between a Charged Drop and an External Acoustic Field. Grigor'ev, A.I.; Gaibov, A.P.; Shiryaeva, S.O. // Technical Physics;Mar2002, Vol. 47 Issue 3, p299 

    Deals with a study which investigated an interaction between capillary oscillations of a charged drop and an external acoustic field under conditions in which nonlinear components of the acoustic pressure on the drop surface may be neglected. Formulation of the problem; Problem of dissipation...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics