TITLE

The Corruptive Influence of High-Stakes Testing

AUTHOR(S)
Van Roekel, Dennis
PUB. DATE
March 2012
SOURCE
NEA Today;Spring2012, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p7
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
An article is presented by the president of the National Education Association (NEA) in which he suggests that high-stakes testing, required under the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act, interferes with a teacher's ability to teach. The author suggests that when teachers are forced to ensure their students perform well on standardized multiple-choice tests, it frustrates them and might even lead to cheating. He concludes that the purpose of education should be to prepare students for their future.
ACCESSION #
75044239

 

Related Articles

  • High-Stakes Testing Narrows the Curriculum. David, Jane L. // Educational Leadership;Mar2011, Vol. 68 Issue 6, p78 

    The article discusses the relationship between content on standardized tests in education and the content of education curricula in the U.S. The author points to research studies between 1990 and 2010 which indicate that state education tests directly affect the content and scope of curricula...

  • Panel Finds Few Learning Benefits in High-Stakes Exams. Sparks, Sarah D. // Education Week;6/8/2011, Vol. 30 Issue 33, p1 

    The article reports on the findings of the U.S. National Research Council's study of test-based incentive systems. An overview of the panel's findings is presented, including their conclusion that approaches taken so far, many implemented under the No Child Left Behind Act, have no impact on...

  • Cross-State Study of High-Stakes Testing Practices and Diploma Options. Johnson, David R.; Thurlow, Martha L.; Stout, Karen Evans; Mavis, Ann // Journal of Special Education Leadership;Sep2007, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p53 

    In response to public demands for better-quality high school graduates and to requirements of No Child Left Behind legislation, states have developed a variety of policies such as high-stakes exit exams and diploma options. Additionally, under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act...

  • An Epidemic of Cheating. Hardy, Lawrence // American School Board Journal;Jul/Aug2013, Vol. 200 Issue 7, p16 

    The article discusses incidents of cheating on high-stakes tests in the U.S. that have been enabled by school administrators and teachers, commenting on increasing opposition to high-stakes testing as a means of measuring student academic success. It comments on school culture that inhibits...

  • Measuring what really matters. Wei, Ruth Chung; Pecheone, Raymond L.; Wilczak, Katherine L. // Phi Delta Kappan;Sep2015, Vol. 97 Issue 1, p8 

    Since the passage of No Child Left Behind, large-scale assessments have come to play a central role in federal and state education accountability systems. Teachers and parents have expressed a number of concerns about their state testing programs, such as too much time devoted to testing and the...

  • Common-Core Tests Loom Large for States, School Districts. Gewertz, Catherine // Education Week;9/10/2014, Vol. 34 Issue 3, p1 

    The article discusses the implementation of the Common Core State Standards in the U.S. and the need for states to have assessment tests in place that can be used in accountability reporting. Topics discussed include concerns that test and curricula may not be in full alignment, waivers...

  • Getting Parent Support for Standardized Test Success. Wherry, John H. // Principal;Nov/Dec2007, Vol. 87 Issue 2, p12 

    The article focuses on how schools can encourage parent participation in their child's education and be aware of the standardized tests that are required by the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). It is suggested that schools hold workshops for parents to introduce them to the testing and...

  • Turnaround School Reaps Double-Digit Proficiency Gains. Klein, Alyson // Education Week;10/5/2011, Vol. 31 Issue 6, p6 

    The article discusses the changes made by the Academy@Shawnee, in Louisville, Kentucky, after receiving the federal School Improvement Grant (SIG), created under the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, including students scoring more than 20 percent better on reading and math proficiency exams.

  • Good Objectives Weighed Down by Fatal Flaws. Weingarten, Randi // U.S. News & World Report;Jan2010, Vol. 147 Issue 1, p36 

    The article discusses the effectiveness of the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act and the criticism that it has received. The author argues that the act has not strengthened public education and that it puts too much emphasis on testing instead of teaching. The author believes that struggling schools...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics