TITLE

Modeling Consumer Demand for Variety

AUTHOR(S)
Jaehwan Kim; Allenby, Greg M.; Rossi, Peter E.
PUB. DATE
June 2002
SOURCE
Marketing Science;Summer2002, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p229
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Consumers are often observed to purchase more than one variety of a product on a given shopping trip. The simultaneous demand (or varieties is observed not only for packaged goods such as yogurt or soft drinks, hut in many other product categories such as movies, music compact disks, and apparel. Multinomial (MN) choice models cannot be applied to data exhibiting the simultaneous choice of more than one variety. The random utility interpretation of either the MN logit or probit model uses a linear utility specification that cannot accommodate interior solutions with more than one variety (alternative) chosen. The analyze data with multiple varieties chosen requires a nonstandard utility specification. Standard demand models in the economics literature exhibit only interior solutions. We propose a demand model based on a translated additive utility structure. The model nests the linear utility structure, while allowing for the possibility of a mixture of corner and interior solutions where more than one hut not all varieties are selected. We use a random utility specification in which the unobservable portion of marginal utility follows a log-normal distribution. The distribution of quantity demanded (the basis of the likelihood function) is derived from these log-normal random utility errors. The likelihood function for this class of models with mixtures of corner and interior solutions is a mixed distribution with both a continuous density portion and probability mass points for the corners. The probability mass points must be calculated by integrals of the log-normal errors over rectangular regions. We evaluate these high-dimensional integrals using the GHK approximation. We employ a Bayesian hierarchical model, allowing household specific utility' parameters. Our utility specification related to the approach of Wales and Woodland (1983) who employ a translated quadratic utility function, Wales and Woodland were only able to study, at the most, three varieties because there was no practical way to evaluate the utility function at that time. In addition, the quadratic utility specification is not a glob- ally valid utility function, making welfare computations and policy experiments questionable. Hendel (1999) and Dube (1999) present an alternative approach in the utility function which is constructed by summing Up over unobservable consumption occasions. While only one variety is consumed on each occasion, the marginal utilities of varieties change over the consumption occasions, giving rise to a simultaneous purchase of multiple varieties. Our Bayesian inference approach allows us to obtain individual household estimates of utility parameters. Household utility estimates are used to compute the value of each variety. We compute a compensating value for the removal of each flavor; that is, we compute the monetary equivalent of the households loss in utility from removal of a flavor. These calculations show that households highly value popular flavors and would incur substantial utility losses from removal of these flavors from the yogurt assortment. Next we consider the implications of our model for retailer assortment and pricing policies. Given limited shelf space, only a subset of the possible varieties can be displayed for purchase at any one time. If consumers value variety; then a retailer with lower variety must compensate the consumers in some was; such as a lower price level. We see this trade-off between price and variety across different retailing formats, Discount or warehouse format re- tailers often have both lower variety and lower prices. To measure this trade-off, we explore the utility loss from reduction in variety and find the reductions in price that will compensate for this utility loss. These price reduction calculations must be based on a valid utility structure. Heterogeneity in tastes is critical in these utility computations and policy experiments. We find that a relatively small fraction of households with extreme preferences dominate the compensating value computations. That is, some households are observed to purchase mostly or exclusively one variety. These households must be heavily compensated for the removal of this variety from the assortment. In some retailing contexts, customization of the assortment is possible at the customer level. We show that such customization virtually eliminates any utility loss from reduction in variety.
ACCESSION #
7497592

 

Related Articles

  • To Market, To Market. Weiskott, Maria // Gifts & Decorative Accessories;Nov2007, Vol. 108 Issue 11, p66 

    The article discusses the market research revealing that attendees of trade shows buy nearly 50% of annual inventory at markets, which conducted by the Gift and Home Trade Association (GFTA) in the U.S. The GFTA survey reported that attendees spend 48% of their time at market and 80% said they...

  • The Circle of Choices Club. Gorman, Allan // Sales & Service Excellence Essentials;Oct2005, Vol. 5 Issue 10, p5 

    The article offers tips on marketing a brand. Selectivity and self interest are just some of the barriers in a brand's success. It is important to develop a clear identity for customers. Offering benefits to customers can be useful to the brand's success.

  • How product management helps your business. Rosenzweig, Stan // Fairfield County Business Journal;5/30/2005, Vol. 44 Issue 22, p29 

    The article evaluates the role of product management in business. Product management is an essential factor in efficient management of business. Poor product management occurs with the inception of new idea for a product. Examples where great product management made all the difference are iPod,...

  • After Sale Is Made, Will Customer Still Be There? Gitomer, Jeffrey // Grand Rapids Business Journal;4/11/2005, Vol. 23 Issue 15, p28 

    Presents pieces of advice on marketing products to prospective customers. Tips on arranging deals with customers; Factors to consider in convincing consumers to purchase the products; Importance of personal meeting with customers to product promotions.

  • CHOICE MAP: INFERRING A PRODUCT-MARKET MAP FROM PANEL DATA. Elrod, Terry // Marketing Science;Winter88, Vol. 7 Issue 1, p21 

    This paper describes Choice Map, a model that infers a product-market map from panel data. Choice Map is a stochastic brand choice model, a random utility quantal choice model, and a multidimensional scaling procedure. Choice Map combines the parsimony of stochastic choice models, the rationale...

  • INNOVATIVE CONSUMERS AND MARKET MAVENS. Goldsmith, Ronald E.; Flynn, Leisa R.; Goldsmith, Elizabeth B. // Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice;Fall2003, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p54 

    Consumer researchers describe two types of consumers they term "the consumer innovator" and "the market maven." The former are eager buyers of new products; the second are especially knowledgeable about shopping and buying. The present study examined the relationship between these two constructs...

  • MODELING JOINT PURCHASES WITH A MULTIVARIATE MNL APPROACH. BoztuĒ§, Yasemin; Hildebrandt, Lutz // Schmalenbach Business Review (SBR);Oct2008, Vol. 60 Issue 4, p400 

    Our research examines the hypothesis that products chosen on a shopping trip to a supermarket indicate the preference interdependencies of consumers between different products or brands. The bundle chosen on the trip can be regarded as an indicator of a global utility function. This function...

  • Variety for sale. Abu-Shalback Zid, Linda // Marketing Management;Jul/Aug2004, Vol. 13 Issue 4, p4 

    This article discusses findings of a study by the Marketing Science Institute on the effects of product varieties on consumers. While high variety strategies help retailers differentiate themselves, they can backfire if customers become overwhelmed by the complexity and number of choices. One...

  • Branding strategies in a changing marketing environment (Indian context). Kumar, S. Ramesh // Journal of Brand Management;Sep2003, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p48 

    Analyzes various dimensions associated with branding strategies in the changing Indian marketing context. Challenge of mass markets; Impact of changes in lifestyles, fragmented market segments and consumer preferences and intense competition from the brands of multinational corporations.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics