TITLE

Firms risk claims from over-65s

PUB. DATE
September 2002
SOURCE
People Management;9/12/2002, Vol. 8 Issue 18, p9
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the impact of a ruling by an employment tribunal Stratford, England that applicants John Rutherford and Samuel Bentley were entitled to redundancy payments and protection against unfair dismissal, on employers without fixed retirement policy. Liability of employers if the ruling is upheld; Remarks from barrister Paul Quain regarding the retirement policies of employers.
ACCESSION #
7446325

 

Related Articles

  • Unfair dismissal cases increase.  // Personnel Today;12/3/2002, p11 

    Focuses on the Future of Work Programme regarding increase in the number of unfair employee dismissal cases in Great Britain. Agency that has sponsored the program.

  • Consider legal implications before firing long-term employee. Best, Peter // Northern Ontario Business;Jan2003, Vol. 23 Issue 3, p12 

    Discusses the legal implications of terminating long-term employees. Compensation for dismissed employees; Case example; Liability for damages for wrongful dismissal.

  • Dismissal payments increase.  // Cabinet Maker;10/22/99, Issue 5160, p5 

    Reports that the maximum compensation in Great Britain for unfairly dismissed workers has more than quadrupled to 50,000 pounds.

  • Dismissal at the end of a trial period following redundancy.  // Accountancy;May86, Vol. 97 Issue 1113, p31 

    Reports on the unfair dismissal case 'Hempell v. W.H. Smith' in Great Britain in 1986. Dismissal of Hempell at the end of a trial period following redundancy; Ruling on the redundancy payment.

  • Cheap, but how cheerful? Younson, Fraser // People Management;6/14/2001, Vol. 7 Issue 12, p18 

    Examines the Acas scheme for unfair dismissal claims in the workplace in Great Britain. Issues raised by employers; Benefits of the scheme to employers; Limitations of the scheme. INSETS: HEARING THE CASE;LEGAL CHECKLIST.

  • Unfair dismissal: qualifying period.  // Accountancy;Jul1985, Vol. 96 Issue 1103, p26 

    Reports on the British government's intention to increase the qualifying period for entitlement to claim unfair dismissal to two years.

  • Redundancy if business improves.  // Accountancy;Jan1986, Vol. 97 Issue 1109, p26 

    Cites the decision of the British Employment Appeal Tribunal in the 'Stacey v Babcock Power Ltd.' case concerning unfair dismissal due to a redundancy. Tribunal's agreement on the unfair conduct of the employer.

  • Unfair dismissal and the informant.  // Accountancy;Aug1989, Vol. 104 Issue 1152, p46 

    Presents a law case review focusing on the procedures to be adopted where dismissal is initiated by a statement as to the employee's conduct made by an informant in Great Britain. Case background; Course of reliability of the informant; Steps taken to ascertain the truth of an informant's...

  • EMPLOYMENT. Keenan, Denis // Accountancy;Nov97, Vol. 120 Issue 1251, p88 

    Cites the ruling made by a British industrial tribunal that a manager was fairly dismissed for drunkenness after she slid down banisters at the employer's premises in the 'Williams v Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors' case. Dismissal of the employee for misconduct; Complaint to the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics