The Supreme Court of California 1971-1972
Tags: APPELLATE courts; CONSTITUTIONAL law
Related Articles
- The Naked Question of the Constitutionality of the Court Proposal. Clarke, John H. // Vital Speeches of the Day;4/1/37, Vol. 3 Issue 12, p369
Presents a speech given by John H. Clarke, former associate justice in U.S. Supreme Court on march 22, 1937 dealing with the constitutionality of the Court proposal. Validity of the increase in the number of judges in the Supreme Court determined by act of Congress; Limitation of jurisdiction...
- A Representative Democratic View of the Court Issue. Lamneck, Arthur P. // Vital Speeches of the Day;4/1/37, Vol. 3 Issue 12, p372
Presents a speech given by Arthur P. Lamneck, congressman of Ohio in the House of Representatives on March 4, 1937 dealing with the issue of U.S. Supreme Court controversy. Efforts taken by people of the U.S. for their rights; Solution of problems by legislation within constitution; Change in...
- Comment. Rode, Lincoln; tenBroek, Jacobus; Epstein, Harold; Hemmings, Charles L. // California Law Review;Mar1937, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p315
Presents commentaries on various administrative cases in the U.S. Position of the Supreme Court on the constitutionality of orders of state administrative bodies on appeal from state courts; Admissibility of Congressional debates in statutory construction by the Supreme Court; Issues concerning...
- CONSTITUTIONALISING CAPITAL CRIMES: JUDICIAL VIRTUE OR 'ORIGINALISM' SIN? Yap Po Jen // Singapore Journal of Legal Studies;Jul2011, p281
The article discusses the argument on the stand of the Singapore Court of Appeal on the Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor for the intended discernment of Framers' intent when understanding the Constitution of the country, and its comparative reasoning in constitutional adjudication. It states...
- Making an Even Number Odd: Deadlock-Avoiding in a Reunified Cyprus Supreme Court. Potier, Tim // Journal on Ethnopolitics & Minority Issues in Europe;2008, Vol. 7 Issue 2, p1
The article outlines how any reunified Cyprus Supreme Court can rely on absolute political equality, whilst still remaining functional and free from potential deadlock. It explains the Annan Plan which proposed that a Supreme Court should have included three non-Cypriot (deadlock-breaking)...
- The Supreme Courts Rhetorical Hostility: What Is "Hostile" to Religion Under the Establishment Clause? Ravitch, Frank S. // Brigham Young University Law Review;2004, Vol. 2004 Issue 3, p1031
Examines the rhetorical use of hostility in the Establishment Clause by the U.S. Supreme Court. Definition of hostility; Conflicts in the rhetorical use of hostility by the Supreme Court as part of its effort toward formalism in religion clause analysis; Background on the use of the concept of...
- Virginia's Answer. // New Republic;11/21/55, Vol. 133 Issue 21, p6
The article presents information related to the Commonwealth of Virginia, which raised seven native sons to be President of the United States, has always been a place of political contrasts. Now the Commonwealth of Virginia has published a state plan of action to defy the Supreme Court ruling on...
- Acclimation and Attitudes: "Newcomer" justices and Precedent Conformance on the Supreme Court. Hurwitz, Mark S.; Stefko, Joseph V. // Political Research Quarterly;Mar2004, Vol. 57 Issue 1, p121
Do newly appointed justices experience acclimation effects upon their ascent to the Supreme Court? We contend that acclimation is a process, as justices' conformation to the doctrine of stare decisis is partly a function of tenure length. We find that precedent conformance is inversely related...
- Summary. // Iceland Country Profile;2009, p58
The article provides an overview of the legal system of Iceland. It says that the Constitution Act is the highest national legal authority in the country while the Supreme Court is the highest court of appeal and is followed by several other district courts. Furthermore, the Icelandic company...
