WHATEVER HAPPENED TO "VALUE DEBATE"?: REFLECTIONS ON NON-POLICY DEBATING IN CEDA
Tags: DEBATES & debating; VALUES; POLICY sciences
Related Articles
- Values, Norms and Policies. Vickers, Geoffrey // Policy Sciences;Mar1973, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p103
Norms are defined as specific but tacit standards of what is socially and individually acceptable; values as explicit but general statements of principle, of which the content is continually changing through changing norms, changing circumstances, changing policies and the accompanying ethical...
- Analysing Policy Arguments. Gasper, Des // European Journal of Development Research;Jun96, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p36
Discusses existing methods and advice on specifying and assessing policy arguments. General advice from informal logic on exploration and analysis of sets of propositions that make up argument; Elements and tactics in policy argumentation; Methods to specify and appraise whole positions in...
- Talk Democracy: How to Reframe the Public Debates. Plotke, David // Social Policy;Fall90, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p26
This article examines several areas where new ideas could reframe current debates in ways that could mobilize public support for substantially progressive positions. A public-private distinction should be affirmed as a barrier against statism; argument should focus on where and how such a...
- ENVIRONMENTAL ATTORNEYS AND THE MEDIA: GUIDELINES FOR EFFECTIVENESS. Stanton, John M. // Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review;2006, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p593
It is often difficult for a public interest advocate to compete with wealthy interests that have vastly greater resources at their disposal and opposing policy preferences. In order to level this playing field, advocates can effectively employ media strategies that allow the public to...
- Myths or reality - a scrutiny of dominant beliefs in the Swedish science policy debate. Granberg, Anders; Jacobsson, Staffan // Science & Public Policy (SPP);Jun2006, Vol. 33 Issue 5, p321
This paper identifies and critically discusses the validity of a set of dominant beliefs in the current debate on Swedish science policy. The beliefs, which centre on academic research, include important assumptions about the scale, orientation, functions, control and funding of such work. We...
- Political Science. Kelhart, Megan Debranski // BioScience;Apr2008, Vol. 58 Issue 4, p296
This article focuses on as public call issued by grassroots group Science Debate 2008 for a presidential debate on science in the U.S. Supporters of Science Debate 2008 argue that science should be a central theme in the presidential election because the important scientific challenges facing...
- We need debate not disapproval. HILTON, ANTHONY // PRWeek (London);7/1/2011, p12
In the article, the author discusses the need for reasonable debates among politicians in Great Britain and not driven by emotions to advance good policies as of July 2011.
- Independent thinking. Ward, Tony; Cupit, Michael // Utility Week;9/15/2006, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p17
The article asserts the need for the European Commission to establish an independent body to promote debate and guide policy formulation in an open and co-operative environment. European energy companies defended themselves against allegations of hoarding, by explaining the commercial...
- THE BELOVED COUNTRY. Asmal, Kader // Finweek;9/30/2010, p70
The author offers his view on African National Congress' (ANC) National General Council (NGC) meeting in Durban, South Africa. He argues that the NGC is a deliberative and not a policy-making body and that the general council meeting will not elect officials or advance new policies so there is...
