Organizing for Homeland Security

Hillyard, Michael J.
March 2002
Parameters: U.S. Army War College;Spring2002, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p75
Academic Journal
Examines the ways corporate world and government organize to address specific missions, products or services concerning homeland security in the U.S. Role of the institutions in determining the optimal structure of homeland security; Methods in institutionalizing the security; Details of the structure organized around the federal bureaucracy.


Related Articles

  • Strong Dissent From Those Who Favor The Department of Homeland Security. Paige, Sean // Insight on the News;7/22/2002, Vol. 18 Issue 26, p8 

    Criticizes the planned creation of the U.S. Department of Homeland Defense and the bureaucracy that it will create. Activities that will be undertaken in the aftermath of the department's creation; Impact of the creation on homeland security.

  • Plant-disease experts blighted by red tape. Knight, Jonathan // Nature;8/14/2003, Vol. 424 Issue 6950, p713 

    Concerns over homeland security have put U.S. plant-disease scientists in the spotlight, and they are enjoying more money and greater visibility as a result. But the attendant bureaucracy and costly security measures already have some of them asking if all the attention is a blessing or a curse....

  • The Players. Clark, Timothy B.; Green, Charles // Government Executive;2/15/2004, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p6 

    The article focuses on some of the people playing important roles in policy development and implementation in the field of homeland security in the U.S. Three years ago, few people had ever heard the phrase homeland security, and the very idea had little meaning outside of several think tanks...

  • Can the national security bureaucracy carry out an ambitious Afghanistan strategy? Kitfield, James // National Journal;5/2/2009, p13 

    The author assesses the capacity of the national security bureaucracy under the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama to carry out a new strategy for the Afghan war. In unveiling the strategy on March 27, 2009, Obama has promised to bring the full weight of U.S. power and prestige to...

  • Homeland security and information sharing: Federal policy considerations. Relyea, Harold C. // Government Information Quarterly;2004, Vol. 21 Issue 4, p420 

    Inadequate information sharing by federal entities was a factor in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Among the responses to this shortcoming is Section 892 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which mandates the prescription of homeland security information-sharing procedures by the...

  • CHAPTER 13: CONCLUSION. Stuart, Douglas T. // Organizing for National Security;11/1/2000, p282 

    Chapter 13 of the book "Organizing for National Security" is presented. It explores the role to be played by the incoming president of the United States. It states that the would be U.S. President also have to make substantial changes in the national security bureaucracy in order to cope with...

  • HARNESSING AMERICA'S POWER. Phillips, Peter C.; Corcoran, Charles S. // JFQ: Joint Force Quarterly;2011 4th Quarter, Issue 63, p38 

    The article proposes a solution for an integrated, agile national security apparatus with the necessary authority and conduct efficient and effective crisis response operations. The core organizations and structure of the U.S. national security bureaucracy have remained largely unchanged since...

  • Is anybody working? Thompson, Bill // Fort Worth Business Press;6/14/2002, Vol. 15 Issue 24, p38 

    Criticizes U.S. president George W. Bush's plan to create a homeland security department. Contravening of Bush's own view of less-is-better government; Author's view that the agency would be a colossal layer of federal bureaucracy.

  • Academic Debates Matter for U.S. Nuclear Strategy, Space Policy. Nichols, Thomas M.; Johnson-Freese, Joan // World Politics Review (19446284);4/14/2011, p2 

    The article discusses an intellectual crisis facing the U.S. in connection with the separation of U.S. national security elites into two tribes of specialists. The author believes that the implications of this division are dangerous and far-reaching. He talks about the natural bureaucratic...


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics