South Camden Citizens in Action: Siting Decisions, Disparate Impact Discrimination, and Section 1983

Cody, Brendan
August 2002
Ecology Law Quarterly;2002, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p231
Academic Journal
Discusses the use of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulations that prohibit disparate impact discrimination to block the siting of a pollutant-producing facility by South Camden citizens in New Jersey. Details of the case; Discussion on the initial opinion of the District Court regarding the case; Examination of the Third Circuit's decision on the case.


Related Articles

  • EPA tightens WaterSense toilet spec.  // Contractor Magazine;Jul2011, Vol. 58 Issue 7, p1 

    The article reports on the announcement of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concerning a revised Version 1.1 of its WaterSense program specification for tank-type toilets. It states that the revision came to address some minor lapses and certification issues. Moreover, EPA is now...

  • WASTE GEMERATP BRIEFS.  // Waste News;9/27/2004, Vol. 10 Issue 11, p5 

    This article presents news briefs on waste management and industry. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approved a final discharge permit that limits the amount of pollutants that may be discharged into the ocean by oil and gas operations located four or more miles from the coast....

  • EPA Lead Certification Deadline Approaching.  // Atlanta Building News;Mar2010, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p10 

    The article reports that renovation firms that wish to work in pre-1978 homes and child-occupied faculties need to apply to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and pay a fee to become certified. Renovators seeking to become a Certified Renovator must successfully complete an...

  • Notices: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.  // Federal Register;11/14/2013, Vol. 78 Issue 220, p68432 

    The article offers information on several notices issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Applicability Determination Index (ADI) Database System Recent Posting notice announces applicability determinations, alternative monitoring decisions, and regulatory interpretations...

  • EPA Proposes Changes to Once-In, Always-In Policy for MACT Standards.  // Modern Casting;Feb2007, Vol. 97 Issue 2, p26 

    The article reports on the proposal by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to change when and how major sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) can change their status to a minor, or area, source. According to section 112 of the Clean Air Act, EPA is required to issue a national...

  • EPA changes toxic inventory list.  // Paint & Coatings Industry;Nov94, Vol. 10 Issue 10, p28 

    Reports on the Environmental Protection Agency's changes to the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) list. Redefinition of the glycol ethers category; Removal of barium sulfate from the barium compounds category; Deletion of color index pigment blue 15:1 from the copper compounds category; Proposal for...

  • What's in the water? It's cause for concern. Geiselman, Bruce // Waste News;11/6/2006, Vol. 12 Issue 14, p26 

    The article reports on R. Rhodes Trussell, an environmental engineer and founder of Pasadena, California-based Trussell Technologies Inc., who has said that the United States needs to re-examine its strategy for dealing with constituents of emerging concern in water supplies. According to...

  • EPA rejects source review appeal. Geiselman, Bruce // Waste News;6/20/2005, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p14 

    The article reports that the U.S. federal regulators have rejected petitions asking them to reconsider the equipment replacement provision that was adopted as part of New Source Review reforms. In a June 6 statement, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said that after considering the...

  • Watch the needle.  // Waste News;2/2/2004, Vol. 9 Issue 22, p8 

    A simple way to visualize the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) approach to environmental protection is as a continuum, with regulate-every-transaction environmental radicalism at one end of the spectrum and free-market antiregulatory industrialism at the other. The EPA has clearly...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics