TITLE

Whitman v. American Trucking Associations, Inc

AUTHOR(S)
Mills, Elizabeth
PUB. DATE
August 2002
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2002, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p159
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to reject the revival of the Nondelegation Doctrine as exhibited in the case Whitman versus American Trucking Associations. Background of the case; Examination of the decision of the court; Analysis of the Nondelegation Doctrine.
ACCESSION #
7298922

 

Related Articles

  • Positive Notes.  // Earth Island Journal;Autumn2001, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p5 

    Presents news briefs related to environmental protection as of September 2001. Decision of the United States Supreme Court on the case `Whitman vs. American Trucking'; Decision of Boise Cascade in dropping its construction plans for a mill; Partnership of Safeway with Organic Coffee Co.

  • AMERICAN TRUCKING: THE "NEW NONDELEGATION DOCTRINE" IS DEAD (LONG LIVE THE OLD ONE?). Wagner, David M. // University of Baltimore Journal of Environmental Law;Fall2003, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p25 

    Examines the new nondelegation doctrine governing the United States Congress' legislative power and its demise in the Supreme court case of Whitman versus American Trucking. Relation between the nondelegation doctrine and the environmental goals in general; Discussion of the new doctrine in...

  • WHITMAN, ADMINISTRATOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al. v. AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC., et al.: certiorari to the United States court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit .  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Whitman, Administrator of Environmental Protection Agency, et al. v. American Trucking Associations, Inc., et al., case number 99-1257, argued on November 7, 2000 and decided on February 27, 2001. The respondents challenged the revised...

  • RETHINKING HEALTH-BASED ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS. LIVERMORE, MICHAEL A.; REVESZ, RICHARD L. // New York University Law Review;Oct2014, Vol. 89 Issue 4, p1184 

    Under the Clean Air Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is required to determine the stringency of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), arguably the most important federal environmental program, without considering the costs of achieving these standards. Instead,...

  • Scalia's Factual Flub Is Part of a Long Supreme Court Tradition. Walker, Jesse // Hit & Run;May2014, p60 

    In the article, the author discusses the inaccuracies in the decisions penned by U.S. Supreme Court justices as of early May 2014. He cites as example the ruling by Justice Antonin Scalia in the case Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) v. EME Homer Air City Generation. He also cites the 2001...

  • EPA V. EME HOMER CITY GENERATION, L.P.: AGENCIES CAN CONSIDER COSTS IN THE FACE OF STATUTORY SILENCE. Li, Ryland // Harvard Environmental Law Review;2015, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p293 

    The article offers information on the judicial decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) v. EME Homer City Generation L.P., in which the Court upheld the Transport Rule as well as Federal Implementation Plans (FIPs) issued by the EPA under the...

  • Casebook. Ross, Mike // Chartered Accountants Journal;Aug98, Vol. 77 Issue 7, p78 

    Provides information on a number of court cases around New Zealand relating to several issues. Reference to the matrimonial property lawsuit of Wood versus Wood filed in the High Court, New Plymouth; Details on the lawsuit surrounding tax deductions; Information on a lawsuit regarding...

  • Retaliatory Lawsuits and Texas's Judicial Proceedings Privilege. Mangrum, Boyd // Review of Litigation;Summer2003, Vol. 22 Issue 3, p541 

    Discusses retaliatory lawsuits and Texas' judicial proceedings privilege. Definition of the term 'retaliatory lawsuit'; Nature and extent of judicial proceedings privilege; Parties protected by the privilege.

  • The duty to take care. Edwards, K. Buckley // Accountancy;Sep72, Vol. 83 Issue 949, p87 

    Presents information about various lawsuits in the year 1972 in Great Britain. Discussion on various lawsuits between the companies and its stock holders; Details of the case involving I.G. Arenson, a shareholder in a company; Information about the proceedings in the case.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics