TITLE

Foreword

AUTHOR(S)
Owen, Dave
PUB. DATE
August 2002
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2002, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p131
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Provides information on several developments in environmental and natural resources law in the U.S. from 2000 to 2001. Discussion on the decision of the Supreme Court to reject the revival of the Nondelegation Doctrine; Background of the Supreme Court case Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Country versus Army Corps of Engineers; Information on a court case in which a federal court had fund an environmental justice violation on the basis of disparate racial impact.
ACCESSION #
7298919

 

Related Articles

  • Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of Engineers: The Failure Of 'Navigability' as a Proxy in Demarcating Federal Jurisdiction for Environmental Protection. Halvarson, Tobias // Ecology Law Quarterly;2002, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p181 

    Discusses the U.S. Supreme Court decision on the case Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County versus Army Corps of Engineers, to end the ability of the Corps to rely on the Migratory Bird Rule in asserting its jurisdiction over intrastate, non-navigable waters. Details of the case;...

  • THE COMMERCE CLAUSE PENDULUM: WILL FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW SURVIVE IN THE POST-SWANCC EPOCH OF 'NEW FEDERALISM'? Tanabe, Jamie Y. // Environmental Law (00462276);Fall2001, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p1051 

    Examines the Supreme Court's decision in 'Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of Engineers.' Implication for federal environmental law; U.S. Supreme Court's inclination to revive principles of federalism; Policy of increasing state jurisdiction over...

  • EPA Should Not Compound Court's Error. Carter, Derb // Environmental Forum;May/Jun2003, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p54 

    Suggests that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency should not compound the problems created by the Supreme Court decision in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County (SWANCC) versus Army Corps of Engineers by revising regulations to eliminate federal Clean Water Act protection for some...

  • 'Impinging On The States'? We Don't Think So. Kusler, Jon // Environmental Forum;May/Jun2003, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p55 

    Comments on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County (SWANCC) versus Army Corps of Engineers, which allowed the Army Corps of Engineers to claim jurisdiction pursuant to the Migratory Bird Rule over the ponds and mudflats at issue. ...

  • No Need For EPA To Act After Court Ruling. Austin, Jay // Environmental Forum;May/Jun2003, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p52 

    Comments the proposal of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency for a post-Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County (SWANCC) versus U.S. Army Corps of Engineers rule-making to redefine Waters of the United States under the Clean Water Act. Argument taken...

  • Supreme Court in the Crystal Ball. Strand, Margaret N.; Rothschild, Lowell M.; McMaster, Amy J.; Weitzel, Jamie // National Wetlands Newsletter;Jan/Feb2006, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p5 

    The article discusses the cases on which the Supreme Court of the United States is going to give its verdict in the year 2006. These cases are "Rapanos v. U.S." and "Carabell v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers." The Supreme Court is also going to reexamine the case of "Warren Co. v. Board of...

  • Filling the SWANCC void. Nevel, Bonnie // National Wetlands Newsletter;Jul/Aug2002, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p2 

    Focuses on the significance of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the 'Solid Waste Agency v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' case on the regulatory authority of various states on their wetlands. Wetland program models across the country; Incorporation of wetland protection into water quality...

  • The 'Chicken Little' Syndrome. Lucas, Ronda Azevedo // Environmental Forum;May/Jun2003, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p56 

    Addresses the implications of the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County versus Army Corps of Engineers decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, which centers on the protection of wetlands and interstate waters. Legal principles behind the case; Actions which strongly refute the doomsday...

  • The Ducks Stop Here. Rabkin, Jeremy // American Spectator;Mar2001, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p14 

    Discusses the decision of the Supreme Court in the case Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Country v. Army Corps of Engineers regarding the creation of a solid waste disposal site in the Chicago suburbs. Facts of the case; Basis of the court's decision; Significance of the decision.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics