TITLE

A Little Just Isn't Enough

AUTHOR(S)
Gegax, T. Trent
PUB. DATE
September 2002
SOURCE
Newsweek (Atlantic Edition);9/9/2002 (Atlantic Edition), Vol. 140 Issue 10, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on Turkey's death-penalty reform. Outlook for the case of Fehriye Erdal, who allegedly murdered Turkish industrialist Ozdemir Sabanci. Question of whether she will be extradited from Belgium to Turkey under the reform; Significance of Erdal's case.
ACCESSION #
7284891

 

Related Articles

  • A Little Just Isn't Enough. Matthews, Owen // Newsweek (Pacific Edition);9/9/2002 (Pacific Edition), Vol. 140 Issue 10, p3 

    Focuses on Turkey's death-penalty reform. Outlook for the case of Fehriye Erdal, who allegedly murdered Turkish industrialist Ozdemir Sabanci. Question of whether she will be extradited from Belgium to Turkey under the reform; Significance of Erdal's case.

  • THE DECISION OF THE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL IN THE LAMBERT WATSON CASE FROM JAMAICA ON THE MANDATORY DEATH PENALTY AND THE QUESTION OF FRAGMENTATION. VASCIANNIE, STEPHEN // New York University Journal of International Law & Politics;Summer2009, Vol. 41 Issue 4, p837 

    The article examines the issues concerning the mandatory death sentence in Jamaica that arose in the court case, Lambert Watson v. The Queen. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council held that the mandatory death penalty for murder was unconstitutional and invalid under the Jamaican law. The...

  • No Place to Hide? Zarembo, Alan // Newsweek (Atlantic Edition);2/11/2002 (Atlantic Edition), Vol. 139 Issue 6, p25 

    Reports on the return of criminals by Mexico to the United States. Refusal of Mexico to extradite Augustín Vázquez Mendoza, a Mexican citizen who allegedly ordered the killing of a Glendale, Arizona drug enforcement officer in 1994; Extradition of Michael Longo, an American, in 2001;...

  • All in the timing - Lords ruling gives price-fixers a reprieve. Scott, Peter // Lawyer;3/17/2008, Vol. 22 Issue 11, p8 

    The author reflects on the decision by the House of Lords of England in the Norris vs. Government of the U.S. case. He says that the case is resolved by emphasizing that secret price-fixing in itself is not capable of being a criminal conspiracy to defraud. To him, such judgment has significant...

  • EXTRADITION.  // International Law Update;Mar2007, Vol. 13, p55 

    The article presents the case of Petru Mironescu of Romania who was convicted in absentia of automotive crimes in the U.S. Petitioning for a writ habeas corpus, he pleaded that the U.S. should not extradite him as Romanian authorities might subject him to torture. Based on the Foreign Affairs...

  • GIVEN HIM A FAIR TRIAL, THEN HANG HIM: THE SUPREME COURT'S MODERN DEATH PENALTY JURISPRUDENCE. Hurwitz, Mark S. // Justice System Journal;2008, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p243 

    In Furman v. Georgia (1972), the Supreme Court ruled the arbitrary and capricious nature of the death penalty rendered it an unconstitutional cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Then, in Gregg v. Georgia (1976), the Court held that Georgia's revised death...

  • CHAPTER XLVIII: SENTENCE AND DEATH.  // Complete Prose Works of Martin Farquhar Tupper;3/ 1/2008, p90 

    Chapter 48 of the book "The Complete Prose Works of Martin Farquhar Tupper" is presented. It depicts the conviction of bailiff Simon Jennings by judge Baron Parker, for the deliberate murder of housekeeper Mrs. Quarles, and the perjured accusations of an innocent man. It emphasizes that Jennings...

  • FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS AND THE DEATH PENALTY: A NEED FOR A RETURN TO THE PRINCIPLES OF FURMAN. Wells, Diane // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Summer1989, Vol. 80 Issue 2, p427 

    This article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's developments in the area of federal habeas corpus review as of June 1989. While the Supreme Court imposed the most severe restrictions to habeas review, access to review for prisoners sentenced to death remained virtually intact. This is highly...

  • Supreme Court Rules Execution Of Juveniles Unconstitutional.  // Jet;3/21/2005, Vol. 107 Issue 12, p11 

    Reports that the United States Supreme Court has outlawed the death penalty for juvenile criminals. Reasons for their decision; History of the court's past decisions regarding the death penalty; Comment from Justice Antonin Scalia, who asserts that capital punishment should be determined by...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics