Old Guard

Crowley, Michael
September 2002
New Republic;9/9/2002 - 9/16/2002, Vol. 227 Issue 11/12, p15
Comments on the move of government in reliance to the private funding for development of nuclear strategy in the U.S. Limitation of the homeland security strategy; Criticism on the effort to defend against nuclear weapons through better sensors and procedures; Ability to respond to domestic chemical, biological or nuclear attacks; Creation of a high-technology system of shipping security.


Related Articles

  • DARHT AXIS II Beam Position Monitors. Johnson, Jeff; Ekdahl, Carl; Broste, William // AIP Conference Proceedings;2004, Vol. 732 Issue 1, p317 

    One of Los Alamos National Laboratory’s (LANL’s) primary responsibilities for national security is to certify the readiness of our nation’s nuclear stockpile. Since the end of underground testing in 1994, LANL has used non-nuclear experiments and computational models to...

  • BY THE NUMBERS.  // Arms Control Today;Mar2009, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p4 

    The article presents the nuclear security spending of U.S. from October 1, 2007 to September 30, 2008. The country has allocated $0.7 billion for nuclear incident management. Under the government's nuclear weapons program, it apportioned $8.3 billion for managing and cleaning toxic and...

  • Monitoring Nuclear Proliferation Should Be A Top U.S. Objective, DSB Says In Report. Host, Pat // Defense Daily;1/27/2014, p1 

    The article reports that the Defense Science Board published a report calling for prioritizing observation for nuclear proliferation as part of the U.S. national security goals. The report "Assessment of Nuclear Monitoring and Verification Techniques" stated that the U.S. government must focus...

  • No Good Choices: The Implications of a Nuclear North Korea. Cirincione, Joseph; Wolfsthal, Jon B. // Brown Journal of World Affairs;Summer/Fall2005, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p269 

    Probes into the implications of the continuing nuclear crisis in North Korea on U.S. national security. Factors which allowed North Korea to consolidate its nuclear capabilities; Possible outcome from assumptions of advanced nuclear capabilities of North Korea; Measure to protect the U.S. and...

  • Nuclear Course Correction. Scott, William B. // Aviation Week & Space Technology;11/7/2005, Vol. 163 Issue 18, p82 

    This article reports that policy-makers are considering a major shift in the U.S. nuclear weapons program, possibly expanding a 13-year-old Science-Based Stockpile Stewardship effort that was established to extend the life of an aging inventory. A study now underway could clear the path for a...

  • Just the Facts. Flory, Peter C. W. // Foreign Affairs;Sep/Oct2006, Vol. 85 Issue 5, p149 

    The article presents a response to an essay entitled "The Rise of U.S. Nuclear Primacy," by Keir Lieber and Daryl Press. The author refutes the original paper's assertions that United States nuclear policy is geared towards making the U.S. the world's supreme nuclear power, alleging that the...

  • WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? Lilienthal, David E. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Nov1949, Vol. 5 Issue 11, p294 

    The author reflects on the efforts of the U.S. government to control the production of nuclear weapons. He lauded the Baruch plan proposed by the government to the United Nations because it is one of the solutions in removing the threat of nuclear warfare. However, he criticized the refusal of...

  • Untitled.  // National Review Bulletin;10/17/1959, Vol. 7 Issue 27, p1 

    The author reflects on the proliferation of pacifism in the U.S. in 1959. It could be noted that a representative group of undergraduate students at Yale University voted in favor of the nuclear tests suspension. The students argued over the radioactive isotopes effects on future generations....

  • Farewell to Nuclear Arms? Thakur, Ramesh // UN Chronicle;Sep/Nov2004, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p64 

    Presents the result of a survey involving the contemporary international nuclear strategic landscape, according to research conducted by the South Korean scientists. Assertion of the U.S. government on their right to develop new generations of earth-penetrating, bunker-busting nuclear weapons...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics