TITLE

In the Michigan Court of Appeals: In the Matter of AMB, a Minor

PUB. DATE
July 2002
SOURCE
Issues in Law & Medicine;Summer2002, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p45
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the legal errors and missteps committed at the preliminary hearing regarding the withdrawal of life support for an infant with life-threatening disabilities at the Michigan Court of Appeals. Statutory process designed to protect individual rights; Disregard for basic principles of law; Legal and evidentiary standards for withdrawal of life support.
ACCESSION #
7158338

 

Related Articles

  • A RESPONSE TO "WHY WITHDRAWING LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT SHOULD NOT REQUIRE 'RASOULI CONSENT'". Hawryluck, Laura // McGill Journal of Law & Health;2012, Vol. 6 Issue 2, p105 

    The article discusses the key issues surrounding the "Hawryluck proposal" and highlights the key challenges facing end of life care for frontline clinicians. It references the article "Why Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment Should Not Require "Rasouli Consent" by Hilary Young which appeared...

  • Tackling Medical Futility in Texas. Truog, Robert D. // New England Journal of Medicine;7/5/2007, Vol. 357 Issue 1, p1 

    This article presents an editorial focusing so-called "futility" cases where patients with no hope of recovery are kept on life support by their families. These cases are often a product of a severe breakdown of trust in the relationship between a clinician and the patient's family. The author...

  • Standard of care and resource implications of the Cuthbertson v. Rasouli ruling. Sibbald, Robert; Chidwick, Paula; Hawryluck, Laura // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;3/18/2014, Vol. 186 Issue 5, p327 

    The article discusses the impact of the Supreme Court of Canada's ruling on the case Cuthberson v. Rasouli, which according to the court is applied only in Ontario and will affect physicians in Ontario seeking to withdraw life support over the decision of their family. Topics discussed include...

  • Constitutional and Legal Protection for Life Support Limitation in India. Mani, R. K. // Indian Journal of Palliative Care;Sep-Dec2015, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p258 

    Appropriate treatment limitations towards the end of life to reduce unwanted burdens require ethical clarity that is supported by appropriate legislation. The lack of knowledge of enabling legal provisions, physicians feel vulnerable to legal misinterpretation of treatment limiting decisions. In...

  • The illusion of autonomy at the end of life: Unconsented... Peters Jr., Philip G. // UCLA Law Review;Feb98, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p673 

    Concludes that a physician who wrongfully administers life-sustaining care over the objections of the patient or her proxy should be liable for compensatory damages. Data about the physician behavior; Discussion on wether compensatory damages should be awarded to patients who are kept alive...

  • IN BRIEF.  // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);10/18/2008, Vol. 337 Issue 7675, p896 

    The article presents medical news briefs including news that the British Healthcare Commission is reviewing death rates of patients receiving heart transplants at the Harefield Hospital in Middlesex, England, the ruling by two Italian courts that there is no legal basis to reverse a court...

  • WHY WITHDRAWING LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT SHOULD NOT REQUIRE "RASOULI CONSENT". Young, Hilary // McGill Journal of Law & Health;2012, Vol. 6 Issue 2, p53 

    The article deals with issues of when medical treatment should stop and who have the right to make such a decision. It references the Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Rasouli v Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre which held that physicians can only remove certain life-sustaining treatment...

  • Discontinuing Life Support Treatment: Evidence of Patient's Wishes--Grace Plaza of Great Neck, Inc. v. Elbaum.  // American Journal of Law & Medicine;1993, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p348 

    Presents information on the lawsuit filed by a U.S.-based long-term health care facility against the husband of a comatose patient for his refusal to pay for his wife's life support services. Liability of the husband after his agreement to the treatment contract; Denial of the termination of...

  • ASPECTOS LEGALES EN SOPORTE VITAL. Del Cerro GarcĂ­a, Raquel // Ciberrevista Enfermeriadeurgencias.com;Mar/Abr2012, Issue 24, p68 

    CPR is an emergency technique, effective, can be mastered by both health professionals and by other people. Its use generates a series of legal and ethical consequences. The doctor-patient relationship is governed by principles already included in the Hippocratic Oath, which urges the doctor to...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics