TITLE

Michigan Court Strikes Down New Voting Law

AUTHOR(S)
Carvlin, Elizabeth
PUB. DATE
July 2002
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;7/19/2002, Vol. 341 Issue 31431, p5
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports the court ruling on the state voting law in Detroit, Michigan. Violation of the state constitution; Queries on the electoral method; Election of the council members by district.
ACCESSION #
7126457

 

Related Articles

  • Is the Defense of Marriage Act Constitutional? Perkins, Tony // U.S. News Digital Weekly;3/11/2011, Vol. 3 Issue 10, p11 

    The author comments on the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act in the U.S. The conflict arises from a court ruling which declared the law's definition of marriage as unconstitutional. According to the author, it is the nature of the law that discriminates based on sexual...

  • Sex Offender Registration.  // Probation & Parole Law Reports;Jan/Feb2013, Vol. 33 Issue 6, p114 

    The article focuses on the enactment of the three-strikes law in California which applies to a criminal defendant, chow is convicted and charged of a felony. It says that after the enactment of the three-strikes law, federal appellate decisions held the 25-year-to-life sentence constituted in...

  • THE "TOUGH LITTLE BUNCH": THE RHODE ISLAND SUPREME COURT'S STRONG JUDICIAL INTEGRATION AND COMMITMENT TO JUDICIAL RESTRAINT. Tripoli, Christina M. // Albany Law Review;2010, Vol. 73 Issue 4, p1607 

    The article focuses on the Rhode Island Supreme Court, featuring its adherence to principles of judicial restraint. The Rhode Island Supreme Court maintains an integrated system, with their application of the state constitution as it is written. The author states that their fairly low reversal...

  • ORIGINALISM AND PRECEDENT. MCGINNIS, JOHN O.; RAPPAPORT, MICHAEL B. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Winter2011, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p121 

    An essay is presented on the combatibility of and the absence of conflict between originalism and precedent. The essayist argues that the Constitution is not displaced when a precedent is followed because it is legislated by U.S. Congress. A consequentialist's approach determines the benefits of...

  • Comment on Cases. H. G. B.; R. D. S. Jr.; G. G. O.; E. E. R.; L. B. B.; E. H.; C. E. F.; E. D. T. Jr.; E. O. E. // California Law Review;Jan1925, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p141 

    Presents updates on court cases and rulings in the U.S. as of January 1, 1925. Comparison of the scope of initiative to the power of the legislature; Effect of the nineteenth amendment in the constitution on jury duty; Role of juvenile courts.

  • Free speech: The need for a consistent standard. Ottley, Bruce; Schweit, Katherine // Human Rights;Fall91, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p2 

    This article comments on court decisions concerning the First Amendment, which deals with the freedom of speech and of the press in the U.S. Although the rights are straightforward, neither the Congress nor the courts has treated the rights as absolutes. The problem has been how to define the...

  • A Clashing of Principles and Jurisdictions. Limbaugh, David // Human Events;9/1/2003, Vol. 59 Issue 30, p13 

    Analyzes legal issues concerning the refusal of Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore to comply with the ruling of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ordering him to remove from his courthouse a Ten Commandments monument. Discussion of the supremacy of the U.S. Constitution over state...

  • Doctors, Lawyers Wage Waiver War.  // O&P Business News;1/1/2007, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p44 

    This article reports that the State Supreme Court of Florida has approved a ruling allowing lawyers to avoid limits on their fees, leading doctors to think about requiring patients to sign waivers limiting their ability to sue. After changing the state constitution in 2004, some lawyers asked...

  • Federal Court Grants Summary Judgment for Marriage Equality in Two Arizona Cases.  // Lesbian -- Gay Law Notes;Nov2014, p457 

    The article reports on the summary judgment granted by Federal Court for marriage equality in two cases in Arizona. These cases are Connolly v. Jeans and Majors v. Horne. The ruling of Senior U.S. District Judge John W. Sedwick says that same-sex marriage bans in Arizona violated the Equal...

  • Constitutional Interpretation Revisited: The Effects of a Delicate Supreme Court Balance on the Inclusion of Foreign Law in American Jurisprudence. Frank, Daniel J. // Iowa Law Review;3/1/2007, Vol. 92 Issue 3, p1037 

    The first of their kind, two recent Supreme Court decisions-- Lawrence v. Texas and Roper v. Simmons--extensively cite foreign law while overturning American constitutional precedents. These controversial rulings fuel a debate that has divided the Court for decades over the status of foreign and...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics