Does a preoperative medically supervised weight loss program improve bariatric surgery outcomes? A pilot randomized study

Parikh, Manish; Dasari, Meena; McMacken, Michelle; Ren, Christine; Fielding, George; Ogedegbe, Gbenga
March 2012
Surgical Endoscopy;Mar2012, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p853
Academic Journal
Background: Many insurance payors mandate that bariatric surgery candidates undergo a medically supervised weight management (MSWM) program as a prerequisite for surgery. However, there is little evidence to support this requirement. We evaluated in a randomized controlled trial the hypothesis that participation in a MSWM program does not predict outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) in a publicly insured population. Methods: This pilot randomized trial was conducted in a large academic urban public hospital. Patients who met NIH consensus criteria for bariatric surgery and whose insurance did not require a mandatory 6-month MSWM program were randomized to a MSWM program with monthly visits over 6 months (individual or group) or usual care for 6 months and then followed for bariatric surgery outcomes postoperatively. Demographics, weight, and patient behavior scores, including patient adherence, eating behavior, patient activation, and physical activity, were collected at baseline and at 6 months (immediately preoperatively and postoperatively). Results: A total of 55 patients were enrolled in the study with complete follow-up on 23 patients. Participants randomized to a MSWM program attended an average of 2 sessions preoperatively. The majority of participants were female and non-Caucasian, mean age was 46 years, average income was less than $20,000/year, and most had Medicaid as their primary insurer, consistent with the demographics of the hospital's bariatric surgery program. Data analysis included both intention-to-treat and completers' analyses. No significant differences in weight loss and most patient behaviors were found between the two groups postoperatively, suggesting that participation in a MSWM program did not improve weight loss outcomes for LAGB. Participation in a MSWM program did appear to have a positive effect on physical activity postoperatively. Conclusion: MSWM does not appear to confer additional benefit as compared to the standard preoperative bariatric surgery protocol in terms of weight loss and most behavioral outcomes after LAGB in our patient population.


Related Articles

  • Revision of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: Success or Failure? Vijgen, G.; Schouten, R.; Pelzers, L.; Greve, J.; Helden, S.; Bouvy, N. // Obesity Surgery;Feb2012, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p287 

    Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is a safe and frequently performed bariatric procedure. Unfortunately, re-operations are often necessary. Reports on the success of revisional procedures are scarce and show variable results, either supporting or declining the idea of...

  • Safety of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: 7-year data from a U.S. center of excellence. Carelli, Allison M.; Youn, Heekoung Allison; Kurian, Marina S.; Ren, Christine J.; Fielding, George A. // Surgical Endoscopy;Aug2010, Vol. 24 Issue 8, p1819 

    Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) has become one of the most common weight-loss procedures performed in the United States. The authors’ high-volume academic medical center has gathered a database of almost 3,000 patients who have undergone LAGB since January 2001. The goal of...

  • Comparison of percentage excess weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Lehmann, Andrzej; Bobowicz, Maciej; Lech, Paweł; Orłowski, Michał; Siczewski, Wiaczesław; Pawlak, Maciej; Świetlik, Dariusz; Witzling, Mieczysław; Michalik, Maciej // Videosurgery & Other Miniinvasive Techniques / Wideochirurgia i;Sep2014, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p351 

    Introduction: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) are acceptable options for primary bariatric procedures in patients with body mass index (BMI) 35-55 kg/m². Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of these two bariatric...

  • Preservation of Fat-free Mass after Bariatric Surgery: A Comparison of Malabsorptive and Restrictive Procedures. WELLS, JASON; MILLER, MEGAN; PERRY, BRITTONNI; EWING, JOSEPH A.; SCOTT, JOHN D.; HALE, ALLYSON L. // American Surgeon;Aug2015, Vol. 81 Issue 8, p812 

    The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has been shown to cause significant weight loss. However, fat-free mass (FFM) is often lost with this rapid weight change. It is suggested that the loss of FFM is minimized with restrictive-only procedures, such as the vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG), when...

  • Bariatric surgery growing as option for obesity. BASSETT, ELIZABETH // Fort Worth Business Press;12/22/2008, Vol. 20 Issue 50, p18 

    The article reports on the popularity of bariatric surgery as an option for obesity. Doctor David Kim, who joined North Hills Hospital to create a bariatric center, says the perception of bariatric surgery as a tool is an essential part of weight loss. He adds that diet and exercise have a place...

  • ?maginary Gastric Banding; losing weight without surgery. Christodoulou, Irene // Archives: The International Journal of Medicine;Jan-Mar2010, Vol. 3 Issue 1, p339 

    Aim of the study Gastric banding is an established surgical procedure for the treatment of obesity. Most people who have weight loss surgery experience gastric banding as a temporary solution to a permanent problem. During the recent years, cognition is an area of special interest for obesity...

  • Should you go under the knife to slim down? Birnbaum, Cara // All You;12/17/2010, Vol. 7 Issue 12, p63 

    This article focuses on weightloss surgery. The most common weightloss surgeries are gastric bypass, which involves stapling the stomach down to a fraction of its normal size, and gastric banding, which arrived with the Lap-Band. The procedures help people lessen the risk of developing...

  • Predicting Outcomes of Intermediate Term Complications and Revisional Surgery Following Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: Utility of the CORE Classification and Melbourne Motility Criteria. Burton, Paul Robert; Brown, Wendy A.; Laurie, Cheryl; Hebbard, Geoff; O'Brien, Paul E. // Obesity Surgery;Nov2010, Vol. 20 Issue 11, p1516 

    Background: Patients with laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands (LAGB) present at times with adverse symptoms or unsatisfactory weight loss, where a liquid contrast swallow or upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is not diagnostic. Stress barium and high resolution manometry are promising...

  • Changes in Eating Behavior After Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Dodsworth, Alison; Warren-Forward, Helen; Baines, Surinder // Obesity Surgery;Nov2010, Vol. 20 Issue 11, p1579 

    This systematic review evaluates the current evidence base for eating behavior changes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). A literature search from 1990 to February 2010 was conducted to identify original studies that assessed eating behavior in adults who have undergone LAGB....


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics