Rain Helps Wash Away Colorado's $10 Billion Bond Bill

Albanese, Elizabeth
July 2002
Bond Buyer;7/12/2002, Vol. 341 Issue 31426, p40
Trade Publication
Reports the approval for the proposed water bond bill in Colorado. Address of the Legislature for the drought and wildfire issues; Prevention of future problems arising from drought; Benefits of the water legislation.


Related Articles

  • Proposed Water Trust Fund May Lead to Fewer Bonds. Dutton, Audrey // Bond Buyer;7/20/2009, Vol. 369 Issue 33151, p5 

    The article reports on the statement by bond issuers that the state and local authorities may issue fewer tax-exempted bonds to finance water infrastructure projects if a $10 billion water trust fund bill will be approved in the U.S. Congress in 2009 in the U.S. It states that the bill will...

  • Water pressure: rewriting the Safe Drinking Water Act Tibbetts, John // Environmental Health Perspectives;Sep1996, Vol. 104 Issue 9, p930 

    No abstract available.

  • House committee approves revised drinking water bill.  // Contractor Magazine;Oct94, Vol. 41 Issue 10, p32 

    Reports on the House Energy and Commerce Committee's approval of a proposed revised Safe Drinking Water Act. Intention of proposed legislation to loosen current rules; Requirements that cancer-causing pollutants be reduced to a no-risk level.

  • Feds open tap for state upgrades. Wright, Andrew G. // ENR: Engineering News-Record;8/19/96, Vol. 237 Issue 8, p8 

    Reports on the Safe Drinking Water Act signed by President Bill Clinton last August 6, 1996. Overhaul of public policy for tap water; Loans for state and localities; Upgrade of systems by investor-owned utilities.

  • Risk management applied to save water legislation.  // Snack Food;Aug96, Vol. 85 Issue 8, p10 

    Reports that the Congress has passed amendments that require the use of sound science, risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis in implementing the regulations for the 1996 Safe Drinking Water Act. Exemption of drinking water disinfectants from the cost mandate.

  • The Rivers Bill is a step too far. Dils, Richard C. // BusinessWest;Mar96, Vol. 12 Issue 11, p8 

    Editorial. Criticizes the Rivers Bill, a proposed legislation on the protection of public drinking water. Negative impact on private property rights; Bill as a contradiction to state leaders' efforts to overturn the Commonwealth's anti-business perception.

  • SDWA--good news, bad news. Barlas, Stephen // American City & County;Sep96, Vol. 111 Issue 10, p12 

    Focuses on the impact of the State Revolving Fund (SRF) which is included as an amendment to the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) of 1996. SRF's provision of funds un low-interest loans for modernization and construction of drinking water treatment facilities; Issue of whether Congress will...

  • Drinking water bill funds construction program.  // Pipeline & Utilities Construction;Oct96, Vol. 51 Issue 10, p5 

    Reports on the passage of the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1996 in the United States. Purpose of the legislation; Appropriation for drinking water pipeline construction in the bill; Funding system.

  • Toxic regulation under California's proposition 65... Helfand, Gloria E.; House, Brett W. // Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm & Resource Issues;1992 1st Quarter, Vol. 7 Issue 1, p18 

    Provides information about the Proposition 65, the 1986 Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of California. Main features included in the implementation of the proposition; Reactions of the food and drug industries after the proposition have been passed; Two categories of the primary...


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics