TITLE

CPCs Fight Back against NARAL-Inspired Attacks

AUTHOR(S)
Andrusko, Dave
PUB. DATE
September 2011
SOURCE
National Right to Life News;Fall2011, Vol. 38 Issue 8, p16
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the initiative of Crisis Pregnancy Centers in the U.S. to address National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws-like attacks. Focal to the article is the First Amendment suit filed by First Resort, a pro-life pregnancy counseling clinic, against an ordinance which First Resort alleges is a violation of its constitutionally protected rights to free speech. The legal complaint focuses on who the ordinance excludes from its liability and enforcement provisions.
ACCESSION #
70702688

 

Related Articles

  • We must not allow the pro-life message to be silenced!  // National Right to Life News;Nov2015, Vol. 42 Issue 11, p3 

    The article discusses the author's views on individuals and groups suppressing others to exercise their freedom of speech. She cites the explanations of interviewed personalities, pro-abortion lawyer Alan Dershowitz and pro-life author Peggy Noonan, on how free speech is being restricted or...

  • FROM ARMBANDS TO DOUCHEBAGS: How DONINGER V. NIEHOFF SHOWS THE SUPREME COURT NEEDS TO ADDRESS STUDENT SPEECH IN THE CYBER AGE. Hayes, Allison E. // Akron Law Review;2010, Vol. 43 Issue 1, p247 

    The article discusses several First Amendment student speech cases including the Doninger v. Niehoff decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. The author explains that the First Amendment of the Constitution stipulates that the Congress shall make no law that abridged the freedom of speech. She reveals...

  • UNITED STATES V. ALVAREZ: WHAT RESTRICTIONS DOES THE FIRST AMENDMENT IMPOSE ON LAWMAKERS WHO WISH TO REGULATE FALSE FACTUAL SPEECH? Haller, Jared Paul // Indiana Law Review;2011, Vol. 45 Issue 1, p191 

    The article offers information about U.S. First Amendment protections for false speech with a focus on the court case United States v. Alvarez. Topics include court cases of the U.S. Supreme Court about free speech restrictions, the violation of the Stolen Valor Act at issue in the Alvarez case,...

  • Pro-aborts contempt for pro-lifers' 1st Amendment no surprise, but frightening nonetheless. Andrusko, Dave // National Right to Life News;Dec2015, p35 

    The article offers information on issues concerning prolife and pro-choice movements in the U.S. It discusses the move of the NARAL Pro-Choice America and its allies to suppress the crisis pregnancy centers' (CPC) First Amendment rights. NARAL's state director Amy Everit's statement about the...

  • THE NORTH CAROLINA WOMAN'S RIGHT TO KNOW ACT: AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL INFRINGEMENT ON A PHYSICIAN'S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH. Bakelaar, Ryan // Michigan Journal of Gender & Law;2014, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p187 

    The North Carolina Woman i Right to Know Act represents the crossroads of the Supreme Court's First Amendment, informed consent, and abortion-related jurisprudence. The Act requires physi-cians to perform an obstetric ultrasound, verbally convey specific in-formation regarding ultrasonographic...

  • Government Speech. Curran Jr, J. Joseph // Supreme Court Debates;Feb2009, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p7 

    An excerpt from a report by Maryland Attorney General J. Joseph Curran Jr. on October 2, 2001 regarding the provision of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibiting Congress of making law abridging the freedom of speech is presented.

  • GOVERNMENT SPEECH.  // Supreme Court Debates;May2015, Vol. 18 Issue 5, p6 

    An excerpt from the report "Freedom of Speech and Press: Exceptions to the First Amendment" is presented.

  • First Amendment/free speech is in the crosshairs. Kolodziej, Elaine // Wilson County News;4/9/2014, p10A 

    The author reflects on the First Amendment to the Constitution of the U.S. which protects the freedom of speech of all Americans in the country.

  • First Amendment provides the muscle.  // Washington Jewish Week;11/19/2015, Vol. 51 Issue 47, p18 

    The author reflects on the U.S. First Amendment and its protection of free-speech rights which is applicable to journalists and demonstrators.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics