TITLE

Few Remarks on Vasilije Lazarevic's Penal Code Draft (1839)

AUTHOR(S)
Stanković, Uroš
PUB. DATE
July 2011
SOURCE
Proceedings of Novi Sad Faculty of Law;2011, Vol. 45 Issue 2, p459
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article sheds light on some unfamiliar details related to Penal Code Draft for Serbia from 1839, authored by the mayor of Zemun Vasilije Lazarevic. As this document to a large extent remained neglected in monographs and articles in relation with codification of criminal law in Serbia in 19th century, the author resolved to explore this topic thoroughly. Archival materials provided solid basis to learn more information in terms of what occurred to forgotten draft after Ministry of Justice had received it. Lazarevic consigned his draft to Minstry of Justice between the end of July and beginning of October 1839. Not long afterwards, the Ministry proposed State Council to form a committee tasked with revision of the draft. State Council rejected the proposal, instructing the Ministry to appoint persons to revise the draft on its own. Only when they have finished revision, the draft would be examined by the State Council's committee. In the following year, 1840, Ministry of Justice requested Prince Mihailo Obrenovic (1839-1842, 1860-1868) to elect members of the committee to revise Lazarevic's draft. Not having jurisdiction over fullfillment of such request, the prince recommended State Council to do so. State Council opted for Minister of Justice Stefan Stefanovic-Tenka, legislator Jovan Hadžic, judge of Appellate Court Lazar Zuban and head of Department of Police and Economics in Ministry of Internal affairs Stefan Radicevic. However, due to turbulent political climate in Serbia, the committee was unable to execute its duty. In 1841, a new committee was formed by State Council. It was made up of member of State Council Golub Petrovic, Minister of Justice Stefan Radicevic, head of Department of Quarantine and Sanitation in Ministry of Internal Affairs Jovan Stejic and professor of law Jovan Raic. Existing historical sources and literature reveal contradictory data regarding the committee's activity. The last commission was appointed in 1843, and it included member of State Council Lazar Zuban, head of Department of Ministry of Justice Sava Šilic, president of Belgrade District Court Lazar Arsenijevic-Batalaka and legislator Jovan Hadžic. The committee had only partly revised the draft, after which it lied in the archives of State Council. At initiative of Department of Justice, State Council adopted the resolution that new drafts of Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure should be composed, which meant Lazarevic's work ceased to represent basis for codification of criminal law. Lacking information on the contents of the draft and observations of committees, available archival materials do not allow to draw resolute conclusions on the topic. Nevertheless, the records of Petrovaradin Border Regiment kept in Croatian State Archives in Zagreb, some of which contain data on early codification of criminal and civil law in Serbia, may potentially offer more explanations to this subject.
ACCESSION #
70138081

 

Related Articles

  • INTRODUCTORY COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE 2009 ROMANIAN NEW CRIMINAL CODE AND THE PREVIOUS ROMANIAN CRIMINAL CODE. DUVAC, CONSTANTIN // Criminal Law Review (2248-0528);2012, Vol. 2 Issue 2, p1 

    In this study, the author presents first the main reasons that led to the development of the 2009 Criminal Code and the objectives pursued by its wording. Subsequently, the author presents the main novelties brought by the regulations contained in the General Part and the Special Part of the new...

  • THE CONCEPT OF CRIMINAL LAW IN THE NEW CRIMINAL CODE. Duvac, Constantin // Criminal Law Review (2248-0528);2012, Vol. 2 Issue 1, p1 

    Following several introduction explanations, the author examines in detail the interpretation rule laid down in Art. 173 of the new Criminal Code, both in relation to the provisions of the Constitution of Romania, republished, and to the fully-fledged membership of our country to the European...

  • NOVOSTI U POSTUPOVNIM ODREDBAMA PREKRÅ AJNOG ZAKONA. Rašo, Marko; Korotaj, Gordana // Croatian Annual of Criminal Law & Practice / Hrvatski ljetopis z;2013, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p779 

    The need to adopt an Act on Amendments to the Misdemeanour Act has been raised due to the observed difficulties in implementing the Misdemeanour Act. Some of the reasons for the adoption of the Act on Amendments to the Misdemeanour Act include the need to halt the new negative trend of a greater...

  • VIOLATING THE RIGHT TO PRIVATE LIFE UNDER THE NEW ROMANIAN PENAL CODE. GORUNESCU, MIRELA // International Conference : CKS - Challenges of the Knowledge Soc;2012, p12 

    It is more and more difficult nowadays that the private life of a person to remain out of other people intervention and out of public visibility. In this context, the present paper is concentrated of a new criminalization included in The New Romanian Penal Code - article 226 from this law. It is...

  • Art. 7 ÅŸi art. 8 din Legea nr. 39/2003. Art. 323 C. pen. Trei infracÅ£iuni distincte? Probleme de interpretare odată cu intrarea în vigoare a noului Cod penal. Dezincriminare. Rîşniţă, Alexandru // Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Romana de Jurisprudenta;2013, Issue 5, p121 

    Article 8 of Law no. 39/2003 does not represent a norm of reference or a norm of warning, but an independent crime, because the text expressly covers the ways of achieving the objective side of the offence, as the legal text contains that „verbum regens" mentioned in the literature when...

  • Unele consideraÈ›ii privind previzibilitatea legii penale. IORDĂCHESCU, Andrei // Criminal Law Writings / Caiete de Drept Penal;2012, Issue 3, p85 

    According to art. 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights, "(1) No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or international law at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier...

  • NOVELTY TO THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, THE REALITIES AND INTEGRATED EUROPEAN STANDARDS. AMZA, Tudor // Romanian Journal of Forensic Science;Apr2014, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p1605 

    The new Criminal Procedure Code requires numerous changes aimed at the creation of a judicial system to match current realities. They were redesigned the basic rules of criminal proceedings, introduced new principles, which are designed to ensure greater efficiency in the exercise of judicial...

  • Criminal Law Protection of Property: A Comparative Critique of the Offences of Stealing and Theft in Nigeria. Yerima, Timothy F.; Oluduro, Olubayo // Journal of Politics & Law;Mar2012, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p167 

    This article considers criminal law protection of property in Nigeria with particular focus on the offences of stealing and theft under the Criminal Code and Penal Code applicable in Southern and Northern Nigeria respectively. A comparative analysis and critique of the features of the offences...

  • THE CONCEPT OF OFFENSE IN THE NEW CRIMINAL CODE. Simionescu, E. G. // AGORA International Journal of Juridical Sciences;2013, Vol. 3, p169 

    As an important part of the general theory of crime, the concept of "crime" and generates continuously generated controversial discussions in the literature reflected differently in criminal law. The new Romanian Criminal Code, although deemed necessary legal definition of the offense by listing...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics