TITLE

WHAT'S THE HARM? NONTAXPAYER STANDING TO CHALLENGE RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS

AUTHOR(S)
Spencer, David
PUB. DATE
September 2011
SOURCE
Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Fall2011, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p1071
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article offers information about the ability of nontaxpayers to have standing to sue to challenge government display of religious symbols in the U.S. Topics include the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court about the standing of nontaxpayers, the issues of offense or stigmatic injury proven in the case law, and the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
ACCESSION #
69651137

 

Related Articles

  • Standing on the Edge: Standing Doctrine and the Injury Requirement at the Borders of Establishment Clause Jurisprudence. Myers, Mary Alexander // Vanderbilt Law Review;Apr2012, Vol. 65 Issue 3, p979 

    The article discusses the legal doctrine of standing in the U.S., the doctrine's injury requirement, and the tension between the standing doctrine and the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution as of April 2012. Several legal cases involving a litigant's right to bring a cause of action...

  • The Future of Taxpayer Standing in Establishment Clause Tax Credit Cases. DEARINGER, BRYAN // Oregon Law Review;2013, Vol. 92 Issue 2, p263 

    The article discusses American taxpayer standing in tax credit-related legal cases which are filed in association with the U.S. Constitution's Establishment Clause as of October 2013, focusing on the definition of U.S. federal judicial power under Article III, Section 2 of the nation's...

  • THE CONFUSION OF FUSION: INCONSISTENT APPLICATION OF THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE NONDELEGATION RULE IN STATE COURTS. Xiang, Jun // Columbia Law Review;Apr2013, Vol. 113 Issue 3, p777 

    It seems almost beyond dispute that if the Federal Establishment Clause prohibits anything, it prohibits religious institutions from wielding governmental power. So thought the U.S. Supreme Court in Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc. when it announced that the delegation of governmental power to...

  • The Misfit Between Standing Doctrine and Its Purposes. Elliott, Heather // Administrative & Regulatory Law News;Spring2009, Vol. 34 Issue 3, p13 

    The author examines the standing doctrine used by the U.S. Supreme Court with respect to the idea of separation of powers. In the author's view, the problems associated with standing doctrine were attributed in part to what she perceives as the Court's use of such a doctrine to perform at least...

  • American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the New York Civil Liberties Union, et al., Amici Curiae. Mach, Daniel // Supreme Court Debates;Jan2014, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p19 

    An excerpt from the Amicus Curiae Brief for Respondents as submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court on September 23, 2013 regarding establishment clause is presented.

  • A FIXTURE ON A CHANGING COURT: JUSTICE STEVENS AND THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE. Chemerinsky, Erwin // Northwestern University Law Review;2012, Vol. 106 Issue 2, p587 

    Throughout his time on the Supreme Court, Justice John Paul Stevens consistently took the "strict separationist" approach to the Establishment Clause. This led him to write and join opinions that stated that the Establishment Clause is violated by religious activity in public schools, by...

  • ARIZONA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL TUITION ORGANIZATION V. WINN: RELIGION STOLE THE MONEY FROM THE TAXPAYER JAR--NO STANDING, THEN WHO? Christopoulos, Elleny // Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review;Winter2012, Vol. 45 Issue 2, p537 

    The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment protects against government-established religion. This protection is meaningless, however, if those protected are unable to challenge Establishment Clause violations because they lack standing. In Flast v. Cohen in 1968, the U.S. Supreme Court...

  • SUPREME COURT DECISIONS.  // Journal of Law & Education;Fall2014, Vol. 43 Issue 4, p535 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's (USSC's) decision to deny certiorari for several education-related legal cases including the 2014 matter of Elmbrook School District v. Doe 3 which deals with several students and their parents who sued a school district which decided to hold high...

  • SUPREME COURT DECISIONS.  // Journal of Law & Education;Jul2012, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p555 

    The article provides brief summaries of several U.S. Supreme Court cases as of July 2012, including cases which were denied review by the court such as Johnson v. Poway Unified Sch. Dist. which deals with a teacher's free speech rights and Alpha Delta Chi-Delta Ch. v. Reed which deals with...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics