Avortement au Canada : lecture boltanskienne d'un débat polarisé

Daigle, Julie
April 2011
Enfances, Familles, Generations;Apr2011, Issue 14, p139
Academic Journal
Taking up the typology developed in Luc Boltanski's book, La condition foetale: une sociologie de l'engendrement et de l'avortement (2004), we will show that Canada's Supreme Court rulings reveal certain antagonistic conceptions of the beings that grow within women's bodies. When we consider majority rulings against minority rulings, we see that the greater the sensitivity towards the fetus, the more polarized judges' positions become. The refusal to democratize the question of abortion by officially opening this debate in the House of Commons is examined in light of this observation


Related Articles

  • TRIAL-BY-EXHAUSTION: THE 1967 ABORTION DEBATE IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS. Mall, David // Today's Speech;Nov1969, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p16 

    This article focuses on the debate on abortion in Great Britain in 1967. Historically, the action of the British government reflects an attitude toward unborn human life which run counter to what has been the prevailing attitude of Western Civilization. Within its developmental context, Western...

  • The unborn something-or-other. Woodard, Joe // Alberta Report / Newsmagazine;11/11/96, Vol. 23 Issue 48, p20 

    Discusses legal controversy in Canada over the issue of abortion, regarding questions of the humanity of unborn children. The case in which Manitoba Justice Perry Schulman ordered the detention of a pregnant mother, addicted to glue-sniffing, until her baby was born; The Supreme Court of...

  • Does the fetus have the right to live? CHUA, PHILIP S. // Filipino Reporter;6/13/2014, Vol. 42 Issue 28, p20 

    The author comments on a debate on whether a fetus has the right to live. Topics discussed include the author's argument that killing a fetus is still murder, the abortion proponents' claim that a fetus is not a human being because it is in the womb as well as the author's disagreement to...

  • The Value of Dissent in Constitutional Adjudication: A Context-Specific Analysis. Vitale, David // Review of Constitutional Studies;Jun2014, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p83 

    This paper addresses the long-standing international debate over whether the publication of dissenting opinions should be permitted in constitutional courts of last resort. It argues in response to this debate that a conclusion of general application is futile. Courts are not identical: their...

  • Rights Adjudication in a Plurinational State: the Supreme Court of Canada, Freedom of Religion, and the Politics of Reasonable Accommodation. CHOUDHRY, SUJIT // Osgoode Hall Law Journal;Spring2013, Vol. 50 Issue 3, p575 

    A disproportionate number of the Supreme Court of Canada's recent cases on freedom of religion come out of Quebec and involve claims for reasonable accommodation. These decisions represent a point of national cleavage in two respects. First, in each case the Quebec Court of Appeal rejected the...

  • R v HART: A NEW COMMON LAW CONFESSION RULE FOR UNDERCOVER OPERATIONS. Hunt, Chris; Rankin, Micah // Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal;2014, Vol. 14 Issue 2, p321 

    The Supreme Court of Canada's recent decision in R v Hart will be of interest to judges and criminal lawyers throughout the commonwealth. At issue in the case was the question of whether an accused could challenge the admissibility of a confession given in the course of 'Mr. Big' undercover...

  • Abortion debate at standstill in Parliament. Swan, Michael // Our Sunday Visitor;6/30/2013, Vol. 102 Issue 9, p11 

    The article discusses the demand from the Supreme Court of Canada to the Canadian Parliament to pass a law that would be in line with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms after it legalized abortion in the country.

  • On how to interpret the role of the future within the abortion debate. Di Nucci, E. // Journal of Medical Ethics;Oct2009, Vol. 35 Issue 10, p651 

    In a previous paper, I had argued that Strong's counterexamples to Marquis's argument against abortion—according to which terminating fetuses is wrong because it deprives them of a valuable future—fail either because they have no bearing on Marquis's argument or because they make...

  • Life Altering. Kinsley, Michael // New Republic;11/1/2004, Vol. 231 Issue 18, p18 

    Makes an argument for embryonic stem cell research, with comparisons to abortion. Note that unborn fetuses can resemble human beings, and their life is at stake for reasons not always life threatening to the mother. Claim that if you accept the theory that life begins at conception, and all...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics