A Criticism of the Sale of Business Doctrine

Nims, Jacque Lynn
May 1983
California Law Review;May83, Vol. 71 Issue 3, p974
Academic Journal
Argues that the sale of business doctrine in the U.S. should be rejected. Information on the legal background and development of the sale of business doctrine; Cases that have confronted the issue; Significance of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


Related Articles

  • SEC Amends Tender Offer "Best Price Rule.". Morris, Duane // Venulex Legal Summaries;2006 Q4, p1 

    The article provides information on the amendments adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to the best price rule applicable to tender offers for securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The changes are made to eliminate any regulatory disincentive to...

  • Belgium: Judgment of the Brussels Labour Court of Appeal of 3 June 2010 -- Plastuni Operations v National Office of Social Security. Kaczmarek, C├ędric; Smeets, Mercedes // European State Aid Law Quarterly;Mar2011, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p5 

    The article discusses a court case wherein Plastuni Operations appealed against the Labour Court of Brussels' dismissal of its challenge of the recovery order by National office of Social security contributions (NOSS). It explores the provisions of the Maribel-bis and Maribel-ter schemes for...

  • Successor Liability under the FLSA. FERDINANDS, PAUL; DUTSON, JEFFREY R. // ABI Journal;Jun2013, Vol. 32 Issue 5, p14 

    The article discusses an inquiry over the efficacy of an asset-purchase agreement provision concerning the purchase and/or succession of a financially distressed business. It refers to the court case, Teed v. Thomas and Betts Power Solutions LLC, wherein a purchaser is subjected to successor...

  • Re-structuring and TUPE. McMullen, John // Industrial Law Journal;Sep2012, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p358 

    The article examines the extent by which protection of employment terms lasts following a transfer of an undertaking as specified under the British Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (TUPE) Regulations 2006. Topics discussed include provisions of TUPE addressing the concern,...

  • Assured One Step Closer to FSA Purchase as Waiting Period Expires. Herman, Jack // Bond Buyer;1/22/2009, Vol. 367 Issue 33046, p7 

    The article reports on the announcement of Assured Guaranty Ltd. that it had cleared a U.S. antitrust obstacle in its proposed acquisition of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd. from Dexia. Assured said that their waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino antitrust law expired on January...

  • COVENANTS NOT TO COMPETE. Garay, Erica B. // Marketing Management;Summer2000, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p61 

    Focuses on the court's enforcement of non-compete agreements between a seller and an acquirer of a business enterprise through examining several related cases in the United States. General scope of restrictive covenants signed in connection with the sale of a business; Decision against the...

  • Pending bill may throw wrench in AirTouch-U S West purchase. Silva, Jeffrey // RCR;04/28/97, Vol. 16 Issue 17, p11 

    Reports that a bill backed by Congress and United States' President Bill Clinton's administration regarding the tax-free stock sale of corporate subsidiaries, could affect the planned acquisition of U S West Incorporated by AirTouch Communications Incorporated. When the legislation was...

  • Changes to staff transfer laws. Manson, Emily // Caterer & Hotelkeeper;4/6/2006, Vol. 196 Issue 4419, p8 

    The article discusses the April 2006 implementation of new laws that govern the transfer of workers between businesses when contracts change hands or companies are taken over in Great Britain. Under the new regulations governing transfer of undertakings and protection of employment, any business...

  • SAILING THROUGH SALES. Singleton, Susan // Accountancy;Feb2009, Vol. 143 Issue 1386, p101 

    The article discusses how the sale of businesses could be affected by certain laws, including the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), and the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998). CA 2006 broadens the responsibilities of corporate directors. DPA 1998 will have an impact on the use of personal...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics