Increased NLRB and Union Activity Puts Employers on Alert

Lawson, Hedley
November 2011
LabTalk;Nov/Dec2011, Vol. 39 Issue 23F, p34
Trade Publication
The article reports on the pressures faced by employers following the legislation of the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) and the increased activities of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and labor unions in the U.S. Private-sector employers and optical laboratories have described such action as an advantage to unions and problem for employers. Moreover, employers have viewed such move as depriving their employees of an opportunity to hear an opposing or balanced employer's view.


Related Articles

  • The power to create or obstruct employee voice: does US public policy skew employer preference for `no voice' workplaces? LeRoy, Michael H. // Socio-Economic Review;2006, Vol. 4 Issue 2, p311 

    Employer demand for voice organizations is severely constrained in the US by a National Labor Relations Act section that outlaws company unions and their functional counterparts. This case study of pertinent NLRB decisions since 1993 shows no relaxation in this strict public policy. Aside from...

  • Off-Duty Workers Can't Solicit for Union.  // Labor Law Journal;Sep73, Vol. 24 Issue 9, p641 

    The article reports on the National Labor Relations Board's ruling that off-duty employees cannot come into the workplace when they are not scheduled for work and solicit for the union in the United States. The Board held that where an employer's no-access rule is nondiscriminatory, it is...

  • Union Sweet Talk and Big Promises Are Campaign Propaganda.  // Labor Law Journal;Jul68, Vol. 19 Issue 7, p441 

    The article examines the merits of a case filed in the U.S. National Labor Relations Board on a campaign propaganda regarding an objection to a representation election based on a union's alleged misrepresentation that other plants had offered more in wages and benefits that what an employer was...

  • PREELECTION TALKS.  // Labor Law Journal;Dec78, Vol. 29 Issue 12, p795 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. National Labor Relations Board to rule that speeches cannot be made to employee assemblies on company time during the 24-hours preceding an election of the labor union. But it is legal for an employer to contact employees on an individual or small...

  • THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT AND NON-UNION EMPLOYERS: POLICY AND PRACTICE ISSUES IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT. Calvasina, Gerald E.; Calvasina, Eugene J.; Calvasina, Richard V. // Journal of Legal, Ethical & Regulatory Issues;Jan2007, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p63 

    For most non-union employers, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) is probably not the federal statute that has drawn a great deal of attention in recent years. Given the steady decline in union membership, density, and the number of representation elections conducted over the last forty...

  • NEW VOTING PROCEDURE FOR PROFESSIONALS.  // Labor Law Journal;Sep50, Vol. 1 Issue 12, p980 

    This article reports that in a new voting procedure set up by the U.S. National Labor Relations Board, professional employees were asked to vote twice on the ballot to determine whether or not they wished to be included in a large unit with nonprofessionals and to indicate which union, if...

  • State Court Enjoins Picketing Which Defies NLRB Certification.  // Labor Law Journal;Aug58, Vol. 9 Issue 8, p552 

    This article presents information related to a state court enjoining picketing which defies NLRB Certification. A state court has jurisdiction to enjoin peaceful picketing by one union for recognition where another union has been certified by the NLRB, according to the New York Court Appeals. In...

  • Employment, labor laws set for change. Kirby, Patrick J. // Journal of Business (10756124);6/4/2009, Vol. 24 Issue 12, p11 

    The article reports on the speculation that a change will be settled in the U.S.'s labor and employment laws. It says that private-sector unions, with 7.5% membership, is having difficulty in setting back the trend. It mentions that the change will cause a union to be distinguished as the...

  • Employee Participation Plans as Section 8(a)(2) Violations. Schmidman, John; Keller, Kimberlee // Labor Law Journal;Dec84, Vol. 35 Issue 12, p772 

    The article discusses labor law in relation to employee participation plans in the United States. In particular, it focuses on how Sections 2(5) and 8(a)(2) of the National Labor Relations Act protect workers from employee participation programs designed to keep unions out. The Section 8(a)(2)...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics