TITLE

Pacific Operators Offshore v. Valladolid (10-507)

AUTHOR(S)
Shertzer, Edan
PUB. DATE
November 2011
SOURCE
Federal Lawyer;Nov/Dec2011, Vol. 58 Issue 10, p64
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the court case Pacific Operators Offshore v. Valladolid which will be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court on October 11, 2011 and deals with a wrongful death claim under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act.
ACCESSION #
67629254

 

Related Articles

  • High Seas Death Act Limits Recovery. Young, Rowland L. // American Bar Association Journal;Sep78, Vol. 64 Issue 9, p1423 

    Details the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Mobil Oil Corporation v. Higginbotham, that in an action for wrongful death on the high seas, the measure of damages is governed by the Death on the High Seas Act, which limits survivors to their pecuniary loss and that survivors are not...

  • Van met rules, but suit can proceed. Roland, Neil // Automotive News;2/28/2011, Vol. 85 Issue 6453, p3 

    The article reports on a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court that a wrongful death suit filed by Delbert Williamson of California against Mazda Motor Corp. can proceed even though the seat belts in the 1993 Mazda minivan in which his wife died met federal safety requirements. According to U.S....

  • Supreme indifference. O'Connor, John // McKnight's Long-Term Care News;Aug2014, Vol. 35 Issue 8, p27 

    The author discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's refusal of a petition from nursing home operator Extendicare Homes Inc. to resolve a conflict related to the Federal Arbitration Act as well as the need for the nursing home sector to better understand dispute arbitration in wrongful death claims.

  • Wrongful death. . . loss of consortium. Ashman, Alan // American Bar Association Journal;Apr79, Vol. 65 Issue 4, p625 

    Reports that the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court has ruled that the loss of consortium is a pecuniary injury and thus compensable in a wrongful death action. Details of the case; Legal precedents; Policy implications on the justice system.

  • Torts.  // Lawyer;7/30/2012, p12 

    The article focuses on the British court case Wilkin-Shaw (Administratrix of the estate of Charlotte Shaw (deceased)) v. Fuller and Kingsley School Bideford Enterprises Ltd. (formerly known as Edgehill College Enterprises Ltd.), which dealt with a death resulting from negligence.

  • The Commercial Loss Doctrine: Ladies and Gentleman of the Jury…Look at this Tangle of Thorns. Howard, William Seth // DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal;Summer2010, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p339 

    The article analyzes the applications of the commercial loss doctrine in contract and tort claims in the construction industry. The purpose and principle of the traditional commercial loss doctrine are explained. The difference between tort theory and contract theory is discussed. Information on...

  • Government Corruption and the Right of Access to Courts. Kim, Una A. // Michigan Law Review;Dec2004, Vol. 103 Issue 3, p554 

    Argues that the U.S. Supreme Court should create a body of jurisprudence to allow for denial-of-access-to-courts claims in cases where official fraud or conspiracy has thwarted a potential cause of action. Origins and current status of the right of access to courts; Reason courts have refused...

  • A BETTER PATH FOR CONSTITUTIONAL TORT LAW. Greabe, John M. // Constitutional Commentary;Summer2008, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p189 

    The article considers the constitutional tort law in the purview of section 1983 of the U.S. Constitution. It explains substantive right under the section, the constitutionality of individual-capacity claims and the Saucier rule. The author proposes a reinterpretation of section 1983 by the...

  • Law on intra-enterprise conspiracies reversed. Young, Rowland L. // ABA Journal;Oct84, Vol. 70 Issue 10, p164 

    Reports that the Supreme Court has disavowed the intra-enterprise conspiracy doctrine in the U.S. Criticisms against the doctrine which held that liability under the Sherman Act is not foreclosed because a parent and its subsidiary corporation have common ownership; Legal precedents; Details of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics