TITLE

Legal Page - Disputed London Market Clauses; it must be English Law in an English Court?

PUB. DATE
January 2011
SOURCE
Asia Insurance Review;Jan2011, p30
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses a court case involving the disputed operation of various London market standard clauses contained in a reinsurance contract entered into between OMEX, a Canadian mutual insurer, and Stonebridge Underwriting Ltd., a Lloyd's Syndicate. The dispute turned upon the operation of an aggregate annual deductible and the claims co-operation clause.
ACCESSION #
67503308

 

Related Articles

  • REINSURANCE ROUND-UP 2010. Mendelowitz, Michael // Journal of the Australian & New Zealand Institute of Insurance &;Feb2011, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p34 

    The article discusses several court cases including IRB Brazil Resseguros SA vs. CX Reinsurance Company Ltd, Stonebridge Underwriting Ltd. vs. Ontario Municipal Insurance Exchange (OMEX) and William Mcllroy Swindon Ltd. and Rannoch Investments Limited vs. Quinn Insurance Ltd. The IRB vs. CX case...

  • RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN EXCESS INSURANCE, SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE, AND REINSURANCE LAW. Mason, Richard C.; Quadrino, Leah M.; Gordon, Sarah D.; Bouhan, Richard M.; Dearie Jr., John P.; Diubaldo, Robert W.; Hughes, John. D.; Toren, Jonathan; Rosenblat, Geoffrey E. // Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal;Jun2010, Vol. 46 Issue 2, p331 

    The period from 2009 to 2010 witnessed many important developments in excess insurance, surplus lines insurance, and reinsurance law and regulation. Most notably, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Bill included a series of new regulations aimed at establishing uniformity for significant features...

  • Tough to avoid immediate harm. Parvin, Cordell // Roads & Bridges;Aug2001, Vol. 38 Issue 8, p14 

    Reports the effects of 'No Damage for Delay' clause on owner and contractor relationship in Broward County, Florida. Lawsuit filed by Triple R Paving Inc. against the county for delay damages; Causes of the delays; Decision of the court on the delay damages claim.

  • Withdrawal fails to stave off cost award.  // Planning (14672073);5/28/2010, Issue 1870, p19 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the decision of the city council to withdraw its objections to the appellants' proposal to discharge three clauses in an obligation agreed in 1995, relative to the permission for residential development, has not saved it from a full award of costs in...

  • What's New in European Arbitration? Van Houtte, Vera; Wilske, Stephan; Young, Michael // Dispute Resolution Journal;May-Jul2007, Vol. 62 Issue 2, p9 

    This article presents a number of incidents pertaining to arbitration throughout Europe and Great Britain. The English Court of Appeal held that arbitrators should decide whether a contract between two parties is valid, unless that which makes it invalid is directly related to the arbitration...

  • Decisions, decisions, decisions. Jennings, Dick // Supply Management;12/11/2008, Vol. 13 Issue 25, p26 

    The article discusses legal developments in 2008 involving public procurement in Great Britain. The decision in the case "Alan Auld Associates v. Rick Pollard Associates" was important for purchasing companies that are making late payment. The "M&J Polymers v. Imerys Minerals" was influential...

  • CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES TO THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT. Bondurant, Elizabeth J.; Henry, Steven D. // Defense Counsel Journal;Apr2011, Vol. 78 Issue 2, p249 

    The article presents a reprint of the article "Constitutional Challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act," by Elizabeth J. Bondurant and Steven D. Henry, which appeared in the March 2011 issue of "Insurance and Reinsurance Committee Newsletter." It focuses on the challenges...

  • The top 20.  // Lawyer;1/7/2013, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p19 

    The article focuses on the top twenty most high-profile British court cases of that will be litigated in 2013. Information is provided on the types of legal cases that will be tried, which includes cases involving professional negligence, reinsurance, and employment law. The article discusses...

  • SCIENCE AND RELIGION TWENTY YEARS AFTER MCLEAN V. ARKANSAS: EVOLUTION, PUBLIC EDUCATION, AND THE NEW CHALLENGE OF INTELLIGENT DESIGN. Beckwith, Francis J. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Spring2003, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p455 

    Argues that the reasoning on the court case McLean versus Arkansas is not applicable to the question of whether a public school runs afoul of the Establishment Clause if it permits or requires the teaching of Intelligent Design. Scholarly support for Intelligent Design; Application of specified...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics