TITLE

GT's IP suit

PUB. DATE
November 2011
SOURCE
New Hampshire Business Review;11/18/2011, Vol. 33 Issue 24, p5
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the move of GT Advanced Technologies which have widened its litigation against the Italian citizen who allegedly stole the company's technology and the company that allegedly benefited from the alleged intellectual property thievery.
ACCESSION #
67469058

 

Related Articles

  • Knowing the Twists and Turns Is Key to Navigating IP Course. PIERCE, EMMET // San Diego Business Journal;11/3/2014, Vol. 35 Issue 44, p16 

    The article reports that the innovative companies, which make San Diego County, Californias technology sector need to tread carefully to avoid becoming the targets of intellectual property lawsuits.

  • The Important Things Have Not Changed. Lyerla, Brad // Intellectual Property Litigation;Fall2016, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p1 

    A first person narrative is presented that explores the author's experience of practice of intellectual property (IP) litigation in the current environment.

  • GTAT-Apple agreement: Evolution of a fiasco. SANDERS, BOB // New Hampshire Business Review;12/12/2014, Vol. 36 Issue 26, p1 

    The article focuses on whether the Halloweem Day 2013 contract between Merrimack, New Hampshire-based materials company GT Advanced Technologies (GTAT) and technology giant Apple was to blame for the October 2014 Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing of GTAT. Topics include statements from GTAT's chief...

  • RAMBUS V. INFINEON: PATENT DISCLOSURES IN STANDARD-SETTING ORGANIZATIONS. Alban, David // Berkeley Technology Law Journal;Annual Review 2004, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p309 

    Compares the Federal Circuit's interpretation of the standard-setting organization's (SSO) intellectual property (IP) policy in the "Rambus v. Infineon" case. Benefits of SSOs IP policies; Overview of the "Rambus v. Infineon" litigation; Examination of the effectiveness of the SSOs IP policies.

  • Dumb Inventors Rejoice: How Daiichi Sankyo v. Apotex Violated the Federal Patent Statute. Gingo, Nicholas J. // Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal;Fall2008, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p81 

    The article discusses considerations on the federal patent statute, the Federal Circuit Court test on the ordinary skill in the art, citing the Daiichi Sankyo v. Apotex case. It argues that the interpretation of the Federal Circuit of the test in looking at the level of ordinary skill violates...

  • A Prometheus, Playing with Fire, Gets Burned. Armitage, Robert A. // Landslide;Jul/Aug2012, Vol. 4 Issue 6, p1 

    The author discusses the aspects of the patent-eligibility appeal of the U.S. Supreme Court on the Bilski, Prometheus, and Mayo case. He is critical of the measures undertaken by the nine Justices on the ruling decision. Also investigated is the nature of the subject or the invention and its...

  • Protecting intellectual property. Pedone, Rose-Robin // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);11/17/97, Vol. 44 Issue 46, p1 

    Discusses the increase in intellectual property lawsuits in the United States. Dilemma by courts over using intellectual property laws that apply to all media and the Internet; Criticism of Host Networks Web site for giving Web sites names culled from the US National Aeronautics and Space...

  • If you can't beat them, enjoin them. Donovan, Thomas J. // New Hampshire Business Review;7/26/2002, Vol. 24 Issue 16, p27A 

    Presents information on the U.S. injunction process. Phases of an injunction; Strategy for obtaining the legal tool; Importance of intellectual property.

  • Beware the Rocket Docket: Litigating Intellectual Property Disputes in the Eastern District of Virginia. Angle, Robert A.; Carr, Dabney J. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2005 Q1, p1 

    The article discusses the litigation of intellectual property disputes in the eastern district of Virginia in 2005. Information on the state's eastern district as the fastest court in the land is presented. The venture of eastern district judges into a pre-trial order drafter for patent...

  • American DJ Sues California Firm for Copyright Infringement, Other Violations.  // Projection, Lights & Staging News;Jun2010, Vol. 11 Issue 5, pC1 

    The article reports on the case filed by an American disc jockey to the U.S District Court Central District of California against NSI Audio Inc. for selling and distributing products under several brand names in Los Angeles, California.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics