TITLE

Coal workers' pneumoconiosis in the United States: regional differences 40 years after implementation of the 1969 Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act

AUTHOR(S)
Suarthana, Eva; Laney, A. Scott; Storey, Eileen; Hale, Janet M.; Attfield2, Michael D.
PUB. DATE
December 2011
SOURCE
Occupational & Environmental Medicine;Dec2011, Vol. 68 Issue 12, p908
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Objective To assess whether the recent increases in the prevalence of coal workers' pneumoconiosis (CWP) in the USA reflect increased measured exposures over recent decades, and to identify other potential causative factors. Methods The observed CWP prevalence was calculated for 12 408 underground coal miner participants in the Coal Workers' Health Surveillance Program for the period 2005e2009, stratified by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) geographical districts. The predicted prevalence was estimated using a published exposureeresponse model from a large epidemiological study among US coal miners using dust exposure, tenure, miner's age and coal rank as predictors. χ2 Testing was performed to compare the observed versus predicted CWP prevalence. Results Observed prevalence was significantly higher than predicted prevalence in MSHA districts 4e7 (central Appalachian region) (10.1% vs 4.2%; prevalence ratio (PR) 2.4; p<0.001) and significantly lower than predicted in other regions (1.6% vs 3.6%; PR 0.4; p<0.001). The central Appalachian region had a significantly older workforce with greater mining tenure, a lower proportion of mines with 200 or more employees, and lower seam heights. Significant lower average compliance dust concentrations were reported for this region. Conclusion The observed CWP prevalence substantially exceeded predicted levels in central Appalachia. However, the increased prevalence was not explained by the measured levels of dust exposures. Likely contributing factors include mine size and low seam mining, which may be associated with higher exposure to silica. Further study is needed to characterise the responsible factors for the elevated CWP rates in central Appalachia
ACCESSION #
67417650

 

Related Articles

  • Life and Death Underground. Cassedy, Robert // New Republic;12/12/70, Vol. 163 Issue 24, p13 

    Comments on U.S. President Richard Nixon's proposals for a comprehensive coal mine health and safety law. Seriousness of the government in enforcing the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act; Health conditions in mines; View that the Social Security Administration has been abusing the law by...

  • Voluntary safety programs draw bi-partisan support. Hofmann, Mark A. // Business Insurance;04/26/99, Vol. 33 Issue 17, p1 

    Reports on the progress of the Models of Safety and Health Excellence Act in the United States House of Representatives. Bipartisan support for the act; Aim to make into law the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) Voluntary Protection Program; Plan by the OSHA...

  • Effects of OSHA reform on enforcement and litigation. Gombar, Robert C.; Sapper, Arthur G. // Occupational Hazards;Oct93, Vol. 55 Issue 10, p45 

    Discusses changes on the enforcement and litigation procedures in the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 as a result of reform bills introduced by Democrats to the US Senate and House of Representatives. Repeal of stay abatement requirements; Role of unions in enforcement litigation;...

  • Other legislative actions to watch.  // Occupational Hazards;Apr95, Vol. 57 Issue 4, p21 

    Focuses on legislative actions concerning industrial safety & hygiene in the United States. Regulatory moratorium; Paperwork reduction; Regulatory impact review.

  • Reforming the regulatory process: How much is too much?  // Occupational Hazards;Apr95, Vol. 57 Issue 4, p63 

    Focuses on the passage of a bill that would require extensive risk and cost-benefit analysis of all major federal regulations concerning industrial safety and health. Risk assessment issues; Impact on the government; Justification of scientific data and methods; Comments from industry executives.

  • Legislating for Safety: Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. Hodgson, J.d. // Management Review;Jun71, Vol. 60 Issue 6, p49 

    Focuses on the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 in the U.S. Start of effectivity of the Act on April 28, 1970; Adoption of existing safety and health standards as initial standards under the Act; Responsibilities of employers and employees under the Act; Penalties for violations.

  • Job safety and health.  // Labor Law Journal;Oct81, Vol. 32 Issue 10, p696 

    Focuses on cases and decisions dealing with job safety and health in the United States. Hearing conservation amendments to U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration's noise standard; Multiyear timetable for development of a field sanitation standard for farmworkers.

  • The Norwood Bills.  // Professional Safety;Nov2003, Vol. 48 Issue 11, p6 

    Focuses on bills related to occupational safety and health in the U.S. Review of the bills conducted by the American Society of Safety Engineers; Commission Efficiency Act; Small Employer Access to Justice Act.

  • ENFORCING JOB SAFETY: A MANAGERIAL VIEW.  // Monthly Labor Review;Mar75, Vol. 98 Issue 3, p36 

    Presents an excerpt from a research paper about views of management and employees regarding enforcement of job safety law in the United States, presented at the 27th Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association in San Francisco, California. Job safety areas of concern to...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics