Wilkinson, Amanda; Benady, David
May 2002
Marketing Week;5/16/2002, Vol. 25 Issue 20, p26
Trade Publication
Focuses on the effects of the Communications Bill on media companies and advertisers in Great Britain. Alteration of the ruling regarding mergers and acquisitions; Apprehension on the increasing number of dominance; Decline of confidence. INSET: COMMUNICATIONS BILL.


Related Articles

  • A billings blackout does no-one good.  // Campaign;3/28/2003, Issue 13, p22 

    The article reports that post-Enron paranoia has gripped the world's leading communications groups, which have imposed a ban on their operating companies issuing unaudited income and billings figures to the media. Their decision reveals much about the siege mentality prevailing in US boardrooms...

  • California Pols Want to Ban Cell Phone Spam. Alberta, Paul M. // Direct;Oct2002, Vol. 14 Issue 13, p9 

    Focuses on the legislative bills in California which would tighten the state's existing law on unsolicited advertising calls to cell phones and pagers. Provisions of the AB-1769 sponsored by Assemblyman Tim Leslie and AB-2944, sponsored by Assemblywoman Christine Kehoe; Coalitions who opposed...

  • Digging up the media landscape.  // Marketing Week;5/16/2002, Vol. 25 Issue 20, p3 

    Focuses on the concerns of the telecommunication industry on the Communications bill in Great Britain. Standardization of broadcasting; Transformation of the commercial radio program; Combination of developments.

  • Taking the Mickey out of media Americanisation. Douglas, Torin // Marketing Week;5/16/2002, Vol. 25 Issue 20, p19 

    Focuses on the effects of the Communications bill on media ownership in Great Britain. Response on the media ownership proposal of the government; Rejection on the application for terrestrial license; Assessment of the broadcasting policy.

  • House Near Passing Wireless Tax Bill. Vadum, Matthew // Bond Buyer;07/12/2000, Vol. 333 Issue 30930, p6 

    Reports the near approval of the United States House of a bill that will impose uniform taxation rules on the wireless telecommunications industry. Amendment of the Communications Act of 1934 by the legislation; Details of the existing wireless taxation system; Complaints of market participants...

  • Pennsylvania forges legislative breakthrough...again.  // CED;Aug2001, Vol. 27 Issue 8, p32 

    Focuses on the amendment of the Unlawful Telecommunications Device Act in Pennsylvania. Enhancement of the state telecommunications security statute; Increase of criminal penalties for violators; Empowerment of the court to order the destruction of unlawful devices.

  • The feeling's mutual. Jackson, Donny // Telephony;09/25/2000, Vol. 239 Issue 13, p11 

    Focuses on a bill in the United States (U.S.) designed to abolish reciprocal compensation payments on Internet traffic. Factors contributing to the imbalance of reciprocal compensation revenues; Reasons the U.S. Federal Communications Commission has ruled that Internet traffic is not subject to...

  • Baby Bells trying to defend their monopolies. Hollings, Sen. // Business Journal Serving Fresno & the Central San Joaquin Valley;3/15/2002, Issue 322903, p27 

    Comments on the approval of the communications bill in the U.S. Extension to the monopoly in broadband communication; Competition in the telecommunication industry; Enforcement of the 1996 Telecommunications Act.

  • Malicious communications.  // Accountancy;Dec1987, Vol. 100 Issue 1132, p39 

    Reports on the Malicious Communications Bill, which makes the sending of indecent or offensive material to a person a criminal offense in Great Britain.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics