Evaluating Radiocarbon Dates and Late Paleolithic Chronology in Korea

Seong, Chuntaek
January 2011
Arctic Anthropology;2011, Vol. 48 Issue 1, p93
Academic Journal
The number of chronometric dates for the Korean Paleolithic has grown substantially during the last decade or so. The present study compiles Late Paleolithic radiocarbon dates for Korea and evaluates their significance based on a critical reexamination of previous works (e.g., Graf 2009; Pettitt et al. 2003). Adopting simple quantitative and qualitative procedures, I categorize the published dates into three groups; accepted, tentative, and rejected. Dates labeled as tentative are then reconsidered in terms of their correspondence with stratigraphic evidence, dates obtained from other methods, and archaeological interpretation. The evaluated dates in turn provide a valuable database on which we can construct a workable chronology of changes in lithic technology and occupational history in the Late Paleolithic in the modern-day Korean Peninsula.


Related Articles

  • The use of percussion drilling to obtain core samples from rock-shelter deposits. Bailey, Geoff; Thomas, Gwyn // Antiquity;Nov87, Vol. 61 Issue 233, p433 

    How many excavators of deep palaeolithic sites, especially in caves or rock-shelters, dig with any clear knowledge of how deep the deposits they are working in actually are, or of the ages of the lower portions? Here an alternative is offered to the traditional approach by a 'deep sounding' of...

  • Developments in radiocarbon calibration for archaeology. Ramsey, Christopher Bronk; Buck, Caitlin E.; Manning, Stuart W.; Reimer, Paula; Van der Plicht, Hans // Antiquity;Dec2006, Vol. 80 Issue 310, p783 

    This update on radiocarbon calibration results from the 19th international Radiocarbon Conference at Oxford in April 2006, and is essential reading for all archaeologists. The way radiocarbon dates and absolute dates relate to each other differs in three periods: back to 12 400 cal BP,...

  • Radiocarbon Chronology of the Siberian Paleolithic. Kuzmin, Yaroslav V.; Orlova, Lyobov A. // Journal of World Prehistory;Mar1998, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p1 

    We have compiled 462 C-14 determinations for 120 Paleolithic and Mesolithic sites from Siberia and the Russian Far East. The Mousterian sites are dated to ca. 46,000–28,500 BP. The Middle–Upper Paleolithic transition dates to ca. 43,300–28,500 BP. Although there are a few...

  • Longquan Cave: an early Upper Palaeolithic site in Henan Province, China. Du, Shuisheng; Li, Xuan; Zhou, Li; Pang, Haijiao; Bar-Yosef, Ofer; Wu, Xiaohong // Antiquity;Aug2016, Vol. 90 Issue 352, p876 

    The Palaeolithic sequence of East Asia differs from that of western Eurasia in that it is characterised by core-and-flake tools. Blade industries only appear late in the sequence, long after the first appearance of modern humans; bone tools and personal ornaments may therefore function as a...

  • Determining the chronology of an archaeological site using radiocarbon: Minimizing uncertainty. Boaretto, Elisabetta // Israel Journal of Earth Sciences;May2007, Vol. 56 Issue 2-4, p207 

    Boaretto, E. 2007. Determining the chronology of an archaeological site using radiocarbon: Minimizing uncertainty. Isr. J. Earth Sci. 56: 207-216.As the analytical precision of radiocarbon dating has improved to ±30 years, it is now possible to address chronological questions in the...

  • Franchthi Cave revisited: the age of the Aurignacian in south-eastern Europe. Douka, K.; Perils, C.; Valladas, H.; Vanhaeren, M.; Hedges, R. E. M. // Antiquity;Dec2011, Vol. 85 Issue 330, p1131 

    The Aurignacian, traditionally regarded as marking the beginnings of Sapiens in Europe, is notoriously hard to date, being almost out of reach of radiocarbon. Here the authors return to the stratified sequence in the Franchthi Cave, chronicle its lithic and shell ornament industries and, by...

  • A question of style: reconsidering the stylistic approach to dating Palaeolithic parietal art in France. von Petzinger, Genevieve; Nowell, April // Antiquity;Dec2011, Vol. 85 Issue 330, p1165 

    The authors deconstruct the basis for dating the Palaeolithic cave paintings of France and find it wanting. Only five per cent are directly dated and the remainder belong to a stylistic framework that has grown organically, and with much circularity, as new paintings were brought to light....

  • SECOND RADIOCARBON INTERCOMPARISON PROGRAM FOR THE CHAUVETPONT D'ARC CAVE, ARDÈCHE, FRANCE. Quiles, A.; Valladas, H.; Geneste, J. -M.; Clottes, J.; Baffier, D.; Berthier, B.; Brock, F.; Ramsey, C. Bronk; Delqué-Količ, E.; Dumoulin, J. -P.; Hajdas, I.; Hippe, K.; Hodgins, G. W. L.; Hogg, A.; Jull, A. J. T.; Kaltnecker, E.; de Martino, M.; Oberlin, C.; Petchey, F.; Steier, P. // Radiocarbon;2014, Vol. 56 Issue 2, p833 

    The Chauvet-Pont d'Arc Cave is one of the most important sites for the study of the earliest manifestations and development of prehistoric art at the beginning of the Upper Paleolithic. Different dating techniques have been performed thus far (AMS 14C, U/Th TIMS, 36Cl dating) to model the...

  • Accelerator radiocarbon dating of the initial Upper Paleolithic in southeast Siberia. Goebel, Ted; Aksenov, Mikhail // Antiquity;Jun95, Vol. 69 Issue 263, p350 

    Confirms the findings of AMS Carbon 14 dating at Kara-Bom, southwest Siberia, regarding the period of transition from Middle to Upper Paleolithic age which is different from the previously found date. Sites chosen for the study; AMS 14C analysis and its results; Discussion; Conclusions.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics