TITLE

REEBOK SETTLES U.S. CHARGES OVER TONING SHOE CLAIMS

PUB. DATE
September 2011
SOURCE
SGB;Sep/Oct2011, Vol. 44 Issue 5, p10
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that Reebok International Ltd. will refund 25 million dollars to consumers who bought its toning shoes as part of a settlement with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) over deceptive advertising. A class-action lawsuit filed against Reebok in U.S. District Court in Boston, Massachusetts is being settled alongside the FTC complaint.
ACCESSION #
67179610

 

Related Articles

  • Avoiding Lawsuits over False Advertising on the Internet. Beaver, Gary L. // In-House Litigator;Winter2012, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p23 

    The article offers clues about what not to do in order to avoid lawsuits in the U.S. over false advertising on the Internet as of January 2012. It believes that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has become more aggressive in examining and challenging Internet advertising as it updates its...

  • Court decisions weaken FTC's public interest power. Cohen, Dorothy // Marketing News;2/14/1975, Vol. 8 Issue 15, p4 

    Analyzes the implications of the decision of a California district court ruling that the U.S. Federal Trade Commission does not have jurisdiction to challenge advertising practices or acts committed by a state. Comments of the commission on an advertisement concerning milk in California;...

  • Fight on over pomegranate health claims. Cline, Harry // Western Farm Press;10/16/2010, Vol. 32 Issue 23, p1 

    The article discusses the lawsuit filed by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) against POM Wonderful LLC on its false advertising on the health benefits of pomegranate juice. It states that the FTC accused POM that the advertisements contains false and unsupported claims on treatment and...

  • FTC OPPOSES NETFLIX SETTLEMENT. Wagner, Holly J. // Home Media Retailing;1/15/2006, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p28 

    The article reports on the opposition of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on a proposed settlement in a class-action subscriber lawsuit filed against Netflix. The reason behind the opposition of FTC is noted. The allegations against Netflix is mentioned. An overview of the FTC-opposed...

  • The Reebok/ FTC Settlement. Kalman, Douglas // Nutraceuticals World;Nov2011, Vol. 14 Issue 9, p34 

    The article discusses the relevance of the case settlement involving the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Reebok International Ltd. to the dietary supplement industry. It details the case that was brought about by advertising and marketing of products which went beyond the company and...

  • DEBT ELIMINATION SCAMMERS SETTLE FTC CHARGES.  // CardLine;6/1/2007, Vol. 7 Issue 22, p4 

    The article reports on the settlement by telemarketing firm Debt Solutions Inc. of a case filed by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). FTC alleged that the company's debt elimination program, particularly for credit card bills, violated federal and state laws by falsely promising consumers...

  • Courts affirm, spell out rules for corrective ads. Hartman, George E. // Marketing News;10/21/77, Vol. 11 Issue 8, p1 

    The article deals with the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to upheld the use of a corrective advertising tool in the case of Warner-Lambert v. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). FTC had issued an order requiring Warner-Lambert to terminate its advertisement of...

  • II. REGULATION OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS. Ostberg, Henry D. // Journal of Marketing;Jul1959, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p79 

    The article summarizes recent case law and legal developments relating to the regulation of product characteristics. In the area of packaging and conditions of sale, some of the court cases include "Mohawk Refining Corporation, et al. v. Federal Trade Commission" with "Royal Oil Corporation, et...

  • Top Court upholds FTC order okaying doctors', dentists' ads. Choudhury, Pravat // Marketing News;5/18/1982, Vol. 15 Issue 24, p16 

    This article reports on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision upholding an order made by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which allowed doctors and dentists to advertise. According to this FTC order, doctors and dentists can now advertise without undue regulation by their local or national...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics