Court's Warming Ruling Not So Hot

Blume, Benjamin A.
October 2011
Best's Review;Oct2011, Vol. 112 Issue 6, p108
Trade Publication
In this article, the author reports that the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in American Electric Power Co. Inc. v. Connecticut has sidesteped important questions about whwther thare can be liability for global warming. The author further says that this decision will do little to abate attempts to respond to global warming through the courts as the court has declined to decide whwther state law tort claims are pre-empted by the Clean Air Act.


Related Articles

  • What's in a name? Jacoby, David // Travel Law Quarterly;Sep2010, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p187 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court which revived a claim of an injured passenger against a cruise ship line. It notes that although at first the passenger sued the wrong party, her claim related back to the initial claim when she later sued the correct party. It claims...

  • Climate Bill Could Trigger Lawsuit Landslide. LoBianco, Tom // Human Events;5/4/2009, Vol. 65 Issue 16, p15 

    The article focuses on a bill on climate change proposed in the U.S. that may result to numerous lawsuits. A provision in the bill may allow people who proclaim themselves as victims of global warming to file a lawsuit against the government or private business enterprises. Henry A. Waxman, the...

  • High court may toss global warming suit. WOJCIK, JOANNE // Business Insurance;4/25/2011, Vol. 45 Issue 17, p1 

    The article offers information on oral arguments held by the Supreme Court in the case, American Electric Power Co. Inc. et. al. vs. State of Connecticut et. al. Skepticism was expressed by justices, indicating that they may be leaning towards the rejection of the case. However, if the Supreme...

  • States Carp Over Asian Carp Invasion. Lazarus, Richard // Environmental Forum;Nov/Dec2011, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p14 

    The article explores the court decision that serves as a reminder that the law of environmental protection is an important precept in the U.S. It highlights a situation in which the state of Illinois and the city of Chicago struggle to avoid an environmental catastrophe rooted in their own...

  • PCI Files Brief In Climate-Change Case Before Supreme Court. Postal, Arthur D. // National Underwriter / P&C;4/25/2011, Vol. 115 Issue 15, p8 

    The article focuses on the case American Electric Power v. Connecticut, No. 10-174, which was heard on April 19, 2011 on the U.S. Supreme Court. It notes that a representative of the administration President Barack Obama has joined in calling the lawsuit unprecedented. Property Casualty Insurers...

  • A Bad Air Fray. SHANOFF, BARRY // Waste Age;Feb2011, Vol. 42 Issue 2, p16 

    The article analyzes the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court case American Electric Power Company v. Connecticut for the waste management industry in the country. Overview of the nuisance lawsuit is provided. The author notes that the decision of the Supreme Court in the case will determine...

  • Trying juveniles as adults: A jurisprudent science perspective. Drogin, Eric Y. // Journal of Psychiatry & Law;Fall2007, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p407 

    The author examines trends in mental health science, mental health practice, and mental health roles, from a jurisprudent science perspective that focuses upon just, neutral, or unjust effects upon victims, offenders, and other affected parties. In Kent versus United States in 1966, the U.S....

  • The Civil Rights Act of 1991: Did it Really Overturn Wards Cove? Gullett, C. Ray // Labor Law Journal;Jul92, Vol. 43 Issue 7, p462 

    This article examines the significance of the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to the overturning of recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings involving employment rights, including the case Wards Cove versus Atonio. Leaving aside the political pressures that resulted in the construction and...

  • IP in the Balance. PIERCE, EMMET // San Diego Business Journal;11/3/2014, Vol. 35 Issue 44, p15 

    The article reports that several U.S. Supreme Court decisions have made it difficult for the patent trolls to file lawsuits, which accuse businesses of infringing on vague and broadly worded patents. Attorney Tom Arno, a partner with Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP said that the issue of...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics