TITLE

Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Acute and Recurrent Appendicitis: Retrospective Analysis of a Single-Group 5-Year Experience

AUTHOR(S)
Fogli, Luciano; Brulatti, Mauro; Boschi, Sergio; Di Domenico, Marco; Papa, Vito; Patrizi, Patrizio; Capizzi, Francesco Domenico
PUB. DATE
April 2002
SOURCE
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques;Apr2002, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p107
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background and Purpose: Twenty years after the first report of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), its role in the treatment of appendicitis is still under debate. We report herein a retrospective analysis of our cases of LA in the last 5 years, during which we adopted a policy of an almost uniform laparoscopic approach on a rather selected population composed mainly of women with acute or recurrent lower quadrant abdominal pain. Patients and Methods: Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed on 33 male and 98 female patients. The mean age at operation was 25.7 ± 11.4 years (range 11-59 years). Acute appendicitis with localized or diffuse peritonitis was present in 34 cases. In the remaining 97 patients, the operation was performed for acute or recurring symptoms of lower quadrant abdominal pain. Results: There were no conversions to open surgery. The operating time was 45 ± 17 minutes (range 30-110 minutes). The pathology examination of the removed appendices showed acute appendicitis in 34 cases and chronic inflammation in the remaining 97 patients. In one case, histology revealed a coexisting mucinous carcinoid that extended to the perivisceral fat, and a completion right hemicolectomy was performed. Complications were minor in most cases. Reoperation for deep abdominal abscess or hematoma was required in three cases. The mean hospital stay was 2.59 ± 1.58 days (range 24 hours-11 days). Conclusion: In our hands, LA has proven to be safe and effective. The laparoscopic operation has significant advantages in terms of lower invasiveness and better diagnostic capability. It is especially useful in women of child-bearing age, in whom it may be considered the procedure of choice.
ACCESSION #
6699121

 

Related Articles

  • LAPAROSKOPSKA APENDEKTOMIJA POSTAJE METODA IZBORA U TRETMANU AKUTNOG APENDICITISA. Delibegović, Samir; Matović, Ervin // Acta Medica Saliniana;2008, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p143 

    Introduction: Laparoscopic appendectomy becomes a usual method in the treatment of acute appendicitis, although its advantage over open appendectomy has been proven. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, a few medical centers are introducing laparoscopic appendectomy as a method of treatment of acute...

  • Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Pregnancy. Wu, Jiann-Ming; Chen, Kuo-Hsin; Lin, Heng-Fu; Tseng, Li-Ming; Tseng, Sheng-Hong; Huang, Shih-Horng // Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques;Oct2005, Vol. 15 Issue 5, p447 

    Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is a safe, effective, and beneficial procedure for the treatment of acute appendicitis. However, limited data are available regarding the safety and feasibility of LA during pregnancy. Methods: Between January 2001 and August 2004, 1235 patients with...

  • Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Italy: An Appraisal of 26,863 Cases. Agresta, Ferdinando; De Simone, Paolo; Leone, Leonardo; Arezzo, Alberto; Biondi, Antonio; Bottero, Luca; Catena, Fausto; Conzo, Giovanni; Del Genio, Gianmattia; Fersini, Alberto; Guerrieri, Mario; Illomei, Giovanni; Tonelli, Pietro; Vitellaro, Marco; Docimo, Giovanni; Crucitti, Antonio // Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques;Feb2004, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p1 

    Objective: To evaluate the practice of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in Italy. Methods: On behalf of the Italian Society of Young Surgeons (SPIGC), an audit of LA was carried out through a written questionnaire sent to 800 institutions in Italy. The questions concerned the diffusion of...

  • Inflammatory Response Is No Different in Children Randomized to Laparoscopic or Open Appendectomy. Simon, Philipp; Burkhardt, Ullrich; Sack, Ulrich; Kaisers, Udo X.; Muensterer, Oliver J. // Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques;Apr2009 Supplement 1, Vol. 19, ps71 

    Background: Previous studies suggest that the inflammatory response after laparoscopic appendectomy is less pronounced than after open surgery. Objective: To compare the clinical course and serum levels of a variety of immunoinflammatory markers in children randomized to either laparoscopic or...

  • Epidemiology of Appendectomy and Appendicitis in the Valencian Community (Spain), 1998–2007. Andreu-Ballester, J. C.; González-Sánchez, A.; Ballester, F.; Almela-Quilis, A.; Cano-Cano, M. J.; Millan-Scheiding, M.; del Castillo, J. Ruiz // Digestive Surgery;2009, Vol. 26 Issue 5, p406 

    Background/Aims: Our purpose was to study the incidence of appendectomy and appendicitis in the Valencian community (Spain) during a period of 10 years (1998–2007). Methods: Data on discharge diagnoses of appendectomy and appendicitis were downloaded from all public hospitals in the...

  • Laparoscopy and acute appendicitis. Pomp, Alfons // Canadian Journal of Surgery;Oct99, Vol. 42 Issue 5, p326 

    Discusses the use of laparoscopic techniques in diagnosing patients having acute appendicitis and has permitted a concurrent therapeutic procedure. Comparison between laparoscopic and open appendectomy; Limitations of laparoscopic instruments; Cost factors involved in laparoscopy.

  • Perforated Appendicitis Is Not a Contraindication to Laparoscopy. Khalili, Thoedore M.; Hiatt, Jonathan R. // American Surgeon;Oct1999, Vol. 65 Issue 10, p965 

    Recent studies have reported an increased risk of intra-abdominal abscess formation following laparoscopic operation for perforated appendicitis. We undertook this study to compare laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in the treatment of perforated appendicitis. Records of all patients...

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy vs. open appendectomy.  // American Family Physician;11/1/1993, Vol. 48 Issue 6, p1133 

    Reports on the study by Schirmer and colleagues comparing the outcomes of patients treated for acute appendicitis with laparoscopic techniques and patients treated with open surgical techniques. Publication of article in the June 1993 issue of the `American Journal of Surgery'; Comparison of...

  • Clinical digest. Appendectomies carried out through 'pinhole' surgery show significant benefits.  // Nursing Standard;5/1/2013, Vol. 27 Issue 35, p14 

    The article discusses research which was reported in the article "Transgastric Appendicectomy" by G. Kaehler et al., was published in the "British Journal of Surgery" and found that appendectomies carried out through pinhole surgery may be more beneficial than traditional appendectomies.

  • New Primary Management for Appendiceal Masses in Children: Laparoscopic Drainage. Marusasa, Takashi; Go Miyano; Kato, Yoshifumi; Yanai, Toshihiro; Okazaki, Tadaharu; Ichikawa, Satoko; Lane, Geoffrey J.; Yamataka, Atsuyuki // Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques;Aug2007, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p497 

    Purpose: The management of appendiceal masses (AM) in children remains controversial. In this study, we evaluated primary laparoscopic drainage (PLD) for efficacy. Methods: Eleven (11) consecutive cases of AM (mean age, 8.1 ± 2.8 years) treated between 2000 and 2004 were the subjects for this...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics