Results of Cervical Arthroplasty Compared with Anterior Discectomy and Fusion: Four-Year Clinical Outcomes in a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

Sasso, Rick C.; Anderson, Paul A.; Daniel Riew, K.; Heller, John G.
September 2011
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;9/21/2011, Vol. 93-A Issue 18, p1684
Academic Journal
Background: The published two-year results of the pivotal U.S. Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption trial with the use of the Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy with fusion for treating single-level degenerative cervical disc disease revealed a significantly superior overall success rate in the arthroplasty group. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the midterm safety and effectiveness of the Bryan disc as an alternative to arthrodesis following anterior cervical discectomy. Methods: A prospective, multicenter randomized clinical trial was undertaken for the treatment of persistent radiculopathy or myelopathy due to single-level cervical disc herniations or spondylosis. Patients were randomized to treatment with either the Bryan disc (the arthroplasty group; 242 patients) or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (the fusion group; 221 patients). Patients completed preoperative and postoperative self-assessment forms at specified intervals and had radiographs made preoperatively, at six weeks, and at three, six, twelve, twenty-four, and forty-eight months after surgery. The primary outcome measure was overall success, a composite variable of safety and efficacy measures. Numerous secondary measures were assessed. The follow-up data for up to twenty-four months have been previously published. We report in the present study the forty-eight-month data collected on 181 patients who received the Bryan disc and 138 patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Results: The study groups were demographically similar. Substantial reduction in Neck Disability Index scores occurred in both groups compared with preoperative values. The greater improvement in the Neck Disability Index score in the Bryan disc cohort persisted through the four-year follow-up period (p < 0.001). The four-year overall success rates were 85.1% and 72.5% for the arthroplasty and fusion groups, respectively (p = 0.004). The improvement in the arm pain score was substantial for both groups and significantly greater in the Bryan disc cohort (p = 0.028), and the neck pain scores showed persistently greater improvement in the Bryan disc group at forty-eight months of follow-up (p = 0.001). Short Form-36 physical component score improvement remained greater among the Bryan disc cohort (p = 0.007). The mean range of motion for the Bryan disc was 8.08° and 8.48° at twenty-four and forty-eight months, respectively. Total and serious adverse event rates were similar between the groups. Conclusions: The forty-eight-month follow-up data in the present report showed consistent, sustained significantly superior outcomes for cervical spine arthroplasty compared with cervical spine fusion. The arthroplasty cohort continued to show significantly greater improvements in Neck Disability Index, neck pain score, arm pain score, and Short Form-36 physical component score, as well as the primary outcome measure, overall success, at forty-eight months following surgery.


Related Articles

  • Experiencia en M�xico con pr�tesis discal de n�cleo. Reporte final a 4 a�os de seguimiento. Rosales-Olivares, Luis Miguel; P�rez-V�quez, Ariel; Miramontes-Mart�nez, V�ctor; Alp�zar-Aguirre, Armando; Reyes-S�nchez, Alejandro Antonio // Cirugia y Cirujanos;ene/feb2007, Vol. 75 Issue 1, p31 

    Background: Discal hernia is generally treated by discectomies that are mutilating and cause instability and low back pain in 50% of the patients. Partial arthroplasty is used in an attempt to avoid degeneration after a discectomy. Methods: Nineteen patients from the INR (National Institute of...

  • A systematic review of randomised clinical trials using posterior discectomy to treat lumbar disc herniations. Gotfryd, Alberto; Avanzi, Osmar // International Orthopaedics;Feb2009, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p11 

    The focus of this study was to examine the safety and effectiveness of three different discectomy techniques using a posterior approach for the treatment of herniated lumbar discs. There are only a small number of prospective randomised studies comparing posterior lumbar discectomy techniques,...

  • Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kamper, Steven; Ostelo, Raymond; Rubinstein, Sidney; Nellensteijn, Jorm; Peul, Wilco; Arts, Mark; Tulder, Maurits // European Spine Journal;May2014, Vol. 23 Issue 5, p1021 

    Purpose: Assessing the benefits of surgical treatments for sciatica is critical for clinical and policy decision-making. To compare minimally invasive (MI) and conventional microdiscectomy (MD) for patients with sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation. Methods: A systematic review and...

  • Subsidence after anterior cervical inter-body fusion. A randomized prospective clinical trial. Kast, Erich; Derakhshani, Sharam; Bothmann, Matthias; Oberle, Joachim // Neurosurgical Review;Apr2009, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p207 

    In ventral fusion after anterior cervical discectomy there is still a remarkable number of cage subsidence and segmental kyphosis seen. The aim of the present study is to assess whether the cage design influences the extent of correction loss during follow-up. Sixty patients with single-level...

  • Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk Herniation. Weinstein, James N.; Tosteson, Tor D.; Lurie, Jon D.; Tosteson, Anna N.A.; Hanscom, Brett; Skinner, Jonathan S.; Abdu, William A.; Hilibrand, Alan S.; Boden, Scott D.; Deyo, Richard A. // JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association;11/22/2006, Vol. 296 Issue 20, p2441 

    The article presents a randomized controlled trial from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial that compares the outcomes in patients who received either surgical or nonoperative treatments for lumbar disk herniation. The authors found that the symptoms of patients that underwent the surgery...

  • Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Disk Disorders. Caragee, Eugene // JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association;11/22/2006, Vol. 296 Issue 20, p2485 

    The article presents an editorial that discusses surgical treatments for degenerative disorders of the lumbar disk and remarks on the results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT), which are reported in this issue and focus on the surgical intervention of diskectomy to treat...

  • Cervical Arthroplasty for Traumatic Disc Herniation: An Age- and Sex-matched Comparison with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Hsuan-Kan Chang; Wen-Cheng Huang; Jau-Ching Wu; Tsung-Hsi Tu; Li-Yu Fay; Peng-Yuan Chang; Ching-Lan Wu; Huang-Chou Chang; Yu-Chun Chen; Henrich Cheng // BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders;Aug2015, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p1 

    Background: The efficacy and safety of using cervical arthroplasty for degenerative disc disease have been demonstrated by prospective, randomized and controlled clinical trials. However, there are scant data on using cervical arthroplasty for traumatic disc herniation. Therefore, this study...

  • Reviewer's comment concerning 'Posterior transdural discectomy: a new approach for the removal of a central thoracic disc herniation.' (doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1990-4 by H.M. Coppes et al.). Mehdian, S. // European Spine Journal;Apr2012, Vol. 21 Issue 4, p629 

    A review of the article "Posterior Transdural Discectomy: A New Approach for the Removal of a Central Thoracic Disc Herniation," by H.M. Coppes, which appeared in the previous issue of the "European Spine Journal" is presented.

  • Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy For Noncontained Cervical Disc Herniation: Minimum 3 Years Follow-Up. Lee, Sang-Ho; Lee, June-Ho; Hur, Sung Min // Internet Journal of Minimally Invasive Spinal Technology;2009, Vol. 3 Issue 4, p52 

    An abstract of the article "Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy For Noncontained Cervical Disc Herniation: Minimum 3 Years Follow-Up," by Sang-Ho Lee and colleagues is presented.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics