A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing mortality rates of private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals

Devereaux, P.J.; Choi, Peter T.L.; Lacchetti, Christina; Weaver, Bruce; Schunemann, Holger J.; Haines, Ted; Lavis, John N.; Grant, Brydon J.B.; Haslam, David R.S.; Bhandari, Mohit; Sullivan, Terrence; Cook, Deborah J.; Walter, Stephen D.; Meade, Maureen; Khan, Humaira; Bhatnagar, Neera; Guyatt, Gordon H.
May 2002
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;5/28/2002, Vol. 166 Issue 11, p1399
Academic Journal
Background Canadians are engaged in an intense debate about the relative merits of private for-profit versus private not-for-profit health care delivery. To inform this debate, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the mortality rates of private for-profit hospitals and those of private not-for-profit hospitals. Methods We identified studies through an electronic search of 11 bibliographical databases, our own files, consultation with experts, reference lists, PubMed and SciSearch. We masked the study results before determining study eligibility. Our eligibility criteria included observational studies or randomized controlled trials that compared private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals. We excluded studies that evaluated mortality rates in hospitals with a particular profit status that subsequently converted to the other profit status. For each study, we calculated a relative risk of mortality for private for-profit hospitals relative to private not-for-profit hospitals and pooled the studies of adult populations that included adjustment for potential confounders (e.g., teaching status, severity of illness) using a random effects model. Results Fifteen observational studies, involving more than 26 000 hospitals and 38 million patients, fulfilled the eligibility criteria. In the studies of adult populations, with adjustment for potential confounders, private for-profit hospitals were associated with an increased risk of death (relative risk [RR] 1.020, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.003-1.038; p = 0.02). The one perinatal study with adjustment for potential confounders also showed an increased risk of death in private for-profit hospitals (RR 1.095, 95% CI 1.050-1.141; p < 0.0001). Interpretation Our meta-analysis suggests that private for-profit ownership of hospitals, in comparison with private not-for-profit ownership, results in a higher risk of death for patients.


Related Articles

  • Does the sale of nonprofit hospitals threaten health care for the poor? Young, Gary J.; Desai, Kamal R. // Health Affairs;Jan/Feb1997, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p137 

    Focuses on the acquisition of nonprofit hospitals by investor-owned corporations. Effects of hospital service on the community; Comparison between the nonprofit and investor-owned hospitals in terms of uncompensated care; Measurement of uncompensated care; Reduction of commitment to community...

  • Psychiatric hospital ownership and performance. Mark, Tami L. // Journal of Human Resources;Summer96, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p631 

    Nonprofit organizations have been hypothesized as being preferable to for-profit organizations in markets characterized by asymmetric information, such as the market for mental health care services. This paper empirically examines whether ownership affects the quality of private psychiatric...

  • Virginia not-for-profits charge less, offer more charity care--alliances. Burda, David // Modern Healthcare;7/24/95, Vol. 25 Issue 30, p24 

    Reports that not-for-profit hospitals in Virginia are charging less than for-profit hospitals for the same type of care despite giving more care to the poor and providing high cost services according to a study by VHA and SunHealth Alliance. Claims by the investor-owned hospital community and...

  • Interpreting Hospital Performance with Financial Statement Analysis. Sherman, H. David // Accounting Review;Jul86, Vol. 61 Issue 3, p526 

    ABSTRACT: Rising hospital costs are of increasing concern to government and industry. The growth and financial success of for-profit hospitals (FPs) in an industry that was once solely populated by nonprofit hospitals (NPs) have suggested that FP business practices may be a more cost-effective...

  • Tennessee alliance faults for-profits' charity board. Burda, David // Modern Healthcare;10/31/94, Vol. 24 Issue 44, p20 

    Discusses the 48-page report on not-for-profit hospitals released by the Hospital Alliance of Tennessee. Comments from R. Clayton McWhorter, chief executive officer of Healthtrust; Comparison of not-for-profit and for-profit hospitals in three specific markets; Purposes of the report.

  • Studies weigh in on for-profit conversions. Bellandi, Deanna // Modern Healthcare;03/27/2000, Vol. 30 Issue 13, p30 

    Reveals the results of a study in the United States on the effects of for-profit hospital conversions. Impact of the conversion on teaching hospitals; Explanation on the discrepancies in the study results; Perception of for-profit purchasers.

  • A level playing field. Fong, Tony // Modern Healthcare;4/14/2003, Vol. 33 Issue 15, p16 

    Reports on the result of a healthcare antitrust hearing, the third in a series by the U.S. Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission in April 2003. Focus of the discussion; Difference between for-profit and not-for profit hospitals; Stance of the panelists on the equality of the...

  • Should government intervene to protect nonprofits? Bloche, M. Gregg // Health Affairs;Sep/Oct1998, Vol. 17 Issue 5, p7 

    Examines the importance of government protection for the non-profit health sector, with focus on medical care. Benefits of the government protection of non-profits; Controversy over comparative performance; Details on the robust policing of transactions; Reference made to a paper published by...

  • At the heart of the matter. Taylor, Mark // Modern Healthcare;02/26/2001, Vol. 31 Issue 9, p26 

    Deals with the competition regarding the establishment of heart hospitals in Indianapolis, Indiana. Actions taken by several proprietary hospitals; Discussion on the growing trend in health care service providers.

  • Columbia study opens fire on Orlando not-for-profits. Greene, Jay // Modern Healthcare;5/15/95, Vol. 25 Issue 20, p22 

    Reports on dispute between investor-owned and not-for-profit hospitals induced by Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.'s study of community benefits in Orlando, Florida. Characterization of several not-for-profit hospitals as providing negative community benefits; Losses by the state of Florida from...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics