F&M inquiry hopes rising

Stones, Mike
April 2002
Farmers Weekly;4/5/2002, Vol. 136 Issue 14, p8
Trade Publication
Reports on the extension granted by the High Court in Great Britain to appeal against the ruling that a public inquiry into the foot-and-mouth crisis was not needed. Amount needed to prepare an application for permission to appeal the High Court ruling; Amount required to finance the appeal; Firm which intervened in favor of public inquiry.


Related Articles

  • No wind of change. Edwards, Martin; Martin, John // Estates Gazette;4/6/2013, Issue 1314, p84 

    The article focuses on Lang J's decision to uphold the British High Court's challenge to the grant of planning permission, on appeal, for a wind farm at Barnwell Manor, Northamptonshire. It also discusses the impact of East Northamptonshire District Council versus Secretary of State for...

  • Court's go-ahead sought to compensate BFS investors. Salmon, James // Money Marketing;12/14/2006, p7 

    The article reports that Grant Thornton of BFS Investments PLC is appealing to the High Court to allow him to pay split-up compensation in Great Britain. Thornton has been barred from distributing compensation until the Financial Services Authority (FSA) has completed its investigation....

  • Shaw and another v MPF Foundations & Piling Ltd.  // Estates Gazette;3/20/2010, Issue 1011, p122 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the British High Court has allowed an appeal from a previous ruling refusing an application to set aside statutory demands served by the respondent in respect of sums awarded in an adjudicator's decision enforced by a judgment of the Technology and...

  • The name game is over. Atkinson, James // Contract Journal;5/12/2004, Vol. 423 Issue 6475, p48 

    Comments on the decision of Alfred McAlpine to withdraw its appeal against the decision of the British High Court to stop it from dropping the Alfred from its company name. Problem with the business name of the company; Aim behind the action taken by the board of directors of Alfred McAlpine;...

  • R (on the application of Albert Court Residents' Association and others) v Westminster City Council.  // Estates Gazette;6/18/2011, Issue 1124, p110 

    The article discusses the decision of the British High Court in a case wherein the appellants appealed for licensing authority in their flats. The court applied the Licensing Act of 2003 in the case. The appellants appealed a ruling that to grant the licence variation was unlawful. The court...

  • Keep it legal. McKenna, Alison // Third Sector;2/17/2009, p20 

    The article focuses on the implications of the creation of the First-tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal under the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 for charities in Great Britain. The author said that the transfer of the Charity Tribunal to the First-tier Tribunal will not affect the...

  • Travelling Expenses to and from a place of work are allowable expenses of a trade or profession which requires constant travel from one place of work to another.  // Accountancy;Feb1971, Vol. 82 Issue 930, p89 

    This article presents the income tax case Horton v. Young. Mr. Horton was a labor-only subcontractor. He was a leader of a small bricklaying team and entered into short-term contracts with a local builder and contractor which involved his travelling for distances of up to fifty miles from his...

  • Freetown Ltd v Assethold Ltd.  // Estates Gazette;3/16/2013, Issue 1311, p82 

    The article discusses the court case, Freetown Ltd. v. Assethold Ltd., wherein the British High Court struck out the appeal by the appellant for an award pursuant to section 101(1) of the Party Wall etc Act 1996. The court ruled that, on a proper construction of section 15, a surveyor's award...

  • VOSA wins tacho appeal. Jewell, Mike // Commercial Motor;11/32005, Vol. 203 Issue 5151, p22 

    This article reports that the Great Britain High Court has granted an appeal by Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) after a truck driver was acquitted of tampering with his tachograph when he proved he had not removed the chart. The High Court allowed an appeal by VOSA against the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics