Therapy-Resistant Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I: To Amputate or Not?

Bodde, Marlies I.; Dijkstra, Pieter U.; den Dunnen, Wilfred F. A.; Geertzen, Jan H. B.
October 2011
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;10/5/2011, Vol. 93-A Issue 19, p1799
Academic Journal
Background: Amputation for the treatment of long-standing, therapy-resistant complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I) is controversial. An evidence-based decision regarding whether or not to amputate is not possible on the basis of current guidelines. The aim of the current study was to systematically review the literature and summarize the beneficial and adverse effects of an amputation for the treatment of long-standing, therapy-resistant CRPS-I. Methods: A literature search, using MeSH terms and free text words, was performed with use of PubMed and EMBASE. Original studies published prior to January 2010 describing CRPS-I as a reason for amputation were included. The reference lists of the identified studies were also searched for additional relevant studies. Studies were assessed with regard to the criteria used to diagnose CRPS-I, level of amputation, amputation technique, rationale for the level of amputation, reason for amputation, recurrence of CRPS-I after the amputation, phantom pain, prosthesis fitting and use, and patient functional ability, satisfaction, and quality of life. Results: One hundred and sixty articles were identified, and twenty-six studies with Level-IV evidence (involving 111 amputations in 107 patients) were included. Four studies applied CRPS-I diagnostic criteria proposed by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Bruehl et al., or Veldman et al. Thirteen studies described symptoms without noting whether the patient met diagnostic criteria for CRPS-I, and nine studies stated the diagnosis only. The primary reasons cited for amputation were pain (80%) and a dysfunctional limb (72%). Recurrence of CRPS-I in the stump occurred in thirty-one of sixty-five patients, and phantom pain occurred in fifteen patients. Thirty-six of forty-nine patients were fitted with a prosthesis, and fourteen of these patients used the prosthesis. Thirteen of forty-three patients had paid employment after the amputation. Patient satisfaction was reported in eight studies, but the nature of the satisfaction was often not clearly indicated, Changes in patient quality of life were reported in three studies (fifteen patients); quality of life improved in five patients and the joy of life improved in another six patients. Conclusions: The previously published studies regarding CRPS-I as a reason for amputation all represent Level-IV evidence, and they do not clearly delineate the beneficial and adverse affects of an amputation performed for this diagnosis. Whether to amputate or not in order to treat long-standing, therapy-resistant CRPS-I remains an unanswered question.


Related Articles

  • Amputation for Long-Standing, Therapy-Resistant Type-I Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Krans-Schreuder, Hilde K.; Bodde, Marlies I.; Schrier, Ernst; Dijkstra, Pieter U.; van den Dungen, Jan A.; den Dunnen, Wilfred F.; Geertzen, Jan H. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;12/19/2012, Vol. 94-A Issue 24, p2263 

    Background: Some patients with long-standing, therapy-resistant type-I complex regional pain syndrome consider an amputation. There is a lack of evidence regarding the risk of recurrence of the pain syndrome and patient outcomes after amputation. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the...

  • Amputation as an Unusual Treatment for Therapy-Resistant Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Type 1. Kashy, Babak K.; Abd-Elsayed, Alaa A.; Farag, Ehab; Yared, Maria; Vakili, Roya; Esa, Wael Ali Sakr // Ochsner Journal;Winter2015, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p441 

    Background: Complex regional pain syndrome, type 1 (CRPS-1) causes severe pain that can be resistant to multiple treatment modalities. Amputation as a form of long-term treatment for therapy-resistant CRPS-1 is controversial. Case Report: We report the case of a 38-year-old man who failed all...

  • Comparison of body-powered voluntary opening and voluntary closing prehensor for activities of daily life. Berning, Kelsey; Cohick, Sarah; Johnson, Reva; Miller, Laura Ann; Sensinger, Jonathon W. // Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development;2014, Vol. 51 Issue 2, p253 

    Persons with an upper-limb amputation who use a body-powered prosthesis typically control the prehensor through contralateral shoulder movement, which is transmitted through a Bowden cable. Increased cable tension either opens or closes the prehensor; when tension is released, some passive...

  • The impact of spinal cord stimulation for upper extremity complex regional pain syndrome on level of function. Haynes, Louise; Goebel, Andreas; Flynn, Maria // International Journal of Therapy & Rehabilitation;Feb2014, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p77 

    Background/aims: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is able to provide significant pain relief in individuals with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Less is known about how this treatment impacts on function, particularly from the patients' perspective. This qualitative exploratory study was...

  • Crossed four-bar mechanism for improved prosthetic grasp. Ramirez, Issa A.; Lusk, Craig P.; Dubey, Rajiv; Highsmith, M. Jason; Maitland, Murray E. // Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development;2009, Vol. 46 Issue 8, p1011 

    Passive linkages were developed to improve grasp functionality and minimize a prosthetic terminal device's number of user-controlled inputs. The linkages act to stabilize grasped objects and substitute for the palp of normal anatomical fingers. The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure was used...

  • Load applied on bone-anchored transfemoral prosthesis: Characterization of a prosthesis--A pilot study. Frossard, Laurent // Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development;2013, Vol. 50 Issue 5, pxi 

    An abstract of the article "Load applied on bone-anchored transfemoral prosthesis: Characterization of a prosthesis—A pilot study," by Laurent Frossard and colleagues is presented.

  • Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I: Disease or Illness Construction? de Asla, Richard J. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;10/5/2011, Vol. 93-A Issue 19, pe116-1 

    In this article the author discusses aspects of the article "Therapy-Resistant Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I: To Amputate or Not?" by Marlies I. Bodde et al. He argues that complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I) is not well understood and that a lack of effective treatment...

  • USER SATISFACTION AND USE OF PROSTHESES IN ICRC'S SPECIAL FUND FOR THE DISABLED PROJECT IN VIETNAM. van Brakel, Wim H.; Poetsma, Peter A.; Tam, Phan Thanh; Verhoeff, Theo // Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal;2010, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p70 

    This study investigated user satisfaction and prosthesis use in the ICRC/SFD project in Vietnam. Clients who were satisfied with the use of their prosthesis were compared to those who were not. Similarly, those with no or light use (0-4 hours/day) were compared with those using the prosthesis...

  • Residual-limb quality and functional mobility 1 year after transtibial amputation caused by vascular insufficiency. Arwert, Henk J.; Van Doorn-Loogman, Mirjam H.; Koning, Jan; Terburg, Martinus; Rol, Mathilde; Roebroeck, Marij E. // Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development;2007, Vol. 44 Issue 5, p717 

    This study identified which residual-limb quality factors are related to functional mobility 1 year after transtibial (TT) amputation. A group of 28 TT amputees were evaluated with respect to their functional mobility (Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire [PEQ], Locomotor Index, Timed Up and Go...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics