TITLE

Arizona Cattle Growers' Pyrrhic Victory for Critical Habitat

AUTHOR(S)
Brauer, Stephanie
PUB. DATE
May 2011
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2011, Vol. 38 Issue 2, p369
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Since the inception of the Endangered Species Act, litigants from both sides of the political spectrum have challenged the US. Fish and Wildlife Service's critical habitat designations, with development interests typically arguing to limit the designation of critical habitat and environmental interests arguing to expand it. For much of the Act's history, the Fish and Wildlife Service and the courts linked protecting critical habitat to preventing the jeopardy or extinction of a species. Yet, even after multiple circuit courts of appeals invalidated this approach in favor of connecting critical habitat to the conservation or recovery of a species, the deficient status quo of preventing harm instead of promoting recovery endures. Arizona Cattle Growers is one example. At first glance Arizona Cattle Growers' Association v. Salazar, a recently decided Ninth Circuit case about the critical habitat designation of the Mexican spotted owl, appears to be just another addition to the litigious history of the Endangered Species Act. While the case may be counted as a conclusive victory for the environmental groups that intervened to ensure the preservation of the Mexican spotted owl's critical habitat, the focus of the court's discussion on whether the Fish and Wildlife Service designated unoccupied areas as occupied critical habitat highlights a less promising aspect of the decision: the ESA's ineffectiveness at promoting species recovery instead of merely preventing their extinction.
ACCESSION #
66612351

 

Related Articles

  • Three suits better than one. Sakariassen, Alex // Missoula Independent;10/16/2014, Vol. 25 Issue 42, p7 

    No abstract available.

  • Rules and Regulations: DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR.  // Federal Register;4/9/2014, Vol. 79 Issue 68, p19712 

    The article presents the final rule from the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) of the U.S. Interior Department on the designation of critical habitat for three subspecies of Mazama pocket gopher including the Olympia pocket gopher, Tenino pocket gopher and the Yelm pocket gopher by about 1,607...

  • Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Revised Critical Habitat for the Tidewater Goby.  // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;10/19/2011, Vol. 76 Issue 202, p64996 

    The article offers information about the proposed rule of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to revise the critical habitat for the tidewater goby, also known for its scientific name Eucyclogobius newberryi, covered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 as amended Act, in various locations...

  • A Policy Analysis of the Collaborative Upper Colorado River Basin Endangered Fish Recovery Program: Cost Savings or Cost Shifting? LOOMIS, JOHN; BALLWEBER, JEFFERY // Natural Resources Journal;Fall2012, Vol. 52 Issue 2, p337 

    This case study evaluates potential benefits to water users and tax-payers from voluntary collaboration versus the "business as usual" regulatory approach to Endangered Species Act (ESA) implementation. It examines whether cooperative efforts between stakeholders work by shifting costs to...

  • A moral question. Sakariassen, Alex // Missoula Independent;8/21/2014, Vol. 25 Issue 34, p7 

    No abstract available.

  • Pushing For Action. Roybal, Joe // BEEF;Sep2010, Vol. 46 Issue 13, p56 

    The article reports that Gerald Tyler, a retired real estate developer, and Dale Lueck, a rancher, sued the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the U.S. Department of the Interior. It states that the government agencies refuse to comply with requirements under the Endangered Species Act...

  • The Increasing Influence of Endangered Species Act Consultation on Environmental Rulemaking. Turner, Andrew; Bulleit, Kristy; Henson, John // Natural Resources & Environment;Summer2015, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p3 

    The article focuses on the use of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) consultation in federal environmental rulemaking in the U.S. Topics discussed include federal agencies being required to consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) before...

  • The Scared Bear: Imminence, Climate Change, and the Endangered Species Act. Welch, Sam // Ecology Law Quarterly;2012, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p675 

    The article discusses the U.S. District Court case In re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing, for the District of Columbia. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) was directed by the Court to avoid taking necessary actions to preserve the habitat of polar bear. The FWS interpretation of...

  • What's a Smelt Worth?: The Endangered Species Act and the Commerce Clause in the Bay-Delta. Welles, Heather // Ecology Law Quarterly;2012, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p683 

    The article discusses the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit Court's decision in San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. Salazar. A Commerce Clause challenge to the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) was denied by the Court, and also offers brief information on cases which were...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics