Frequency of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing in urban vs. rural areas of the United States: Results from a nationally-representative sample

January 2011
BMC Public Health;2011, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p681
Academic Journal
The article offers information on a study conducted by the authors comparing HIV testing in rural with urban areas of the U.S. It states that 257,895 respondents were there in the study and HIV testing ranged from 32.2 percent in rural population to 43.6 percent among people living in urban areas. It reports that HIV testing did not change in both settings following the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendation for testing.


Related Articles

  • Routine HIV Screening Recommended for Most Patients.  // Clinician Reviews;Nov2006, Vol. 16 Issue 11, p16 

    The article highlights the recommendations released by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for HIV screening of adults, adolescents and pregnant women in health-care settings. According to CDC recommendations, all patients ages 13 to 64 should be screened for HIV infection....

  • Compliance with a New York State 2010 HIV Testing Law: Is There Racial/Ethnic Bias in HIV Testing? Experience of Monroe County, New York, 2012. Kennedy, Byron S.; Kern, Anne; Ricci, John; Younge, Mary; Carelock, Kathy; Bedard, Brenden; Smith, Kim; Inscho, Roxana // Ethnicity & Disease;Winter2016, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p91 

    Background: While routine HIV testing in the general population is a national recommendation, actual practice may vary.Purpose: To determine risk factors associated with HIV testing after the adoption of a New York State law in 2010 mandating that health care providers...

  • MMWR - Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.  // Biomedical Market Newsletter;12/20/2010, p72 

    The article presents a Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) of the U.S. for the month of December 2010. The New Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) analysis finds one in five gay and bisexual men in a study of 21 major U.S. cities are infected with HIV and nearly half are...

  • To Screen or Not to Screen: Is That Really the Question? Branson, Bernard M. // Annals of Internal Medicine;12/5/2006, Vol. 145 Issue 11, p857 

    In this article, the author reflects on the cost-effectiveness of HIV screening. He compares the results of studies conducted by professor A. David Paltiel and colleagues and other HIV screening programs. He reveals the recommendation of HIV screening by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and...

  • CDC RECOMMENDS ROUTINE, VOLUNTARY HIV SCREENING IN HEALTH CARE SETTINGS.  // Indian Journal of Medical Sciences;Oct2006, Vol. 60 Issue 10, p441 

    The article reports that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has launched new recommendations for health care providers to make voluntary HIV screening in health care settings. They are intended to increase early HIV diagnosis among HIV-positive Americans. The recommendations...

  • Legal and Ethical Implications of Opt-Out HIV Testing. Hanssens, Catherine // Clinical Infectious Diseases;12/15/2007 Supplement 4, Vol. 45, pS232 

    New guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that opt-out screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) without written patient consent be part of routine clinical care and imply that state HIV-associated laws in conflict with this approach should be amended....

  • Funding and Implementing Routine Testing for HIV. Munar, David Ernesto // Clinical Infectious Diseases;12/15/2007 Supplement 4, Vol. 45, pS244 

    The article comments on the issue of funding and implementation of routine testing for HIV infection in the U.S. According to the author, community groups have challenged a perceived underlying principle of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) recommendation for widescale...

  • Experts Say Effects Of New CDC Guidelines Will Be Far-reaching. Harding, Rick // Advocate;8/13/91, Issue 583, p14 

    Reports on concerns that guidelines released by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control calling for voluntary testing for HIV of some health care workers may have far-reaching negative effects. Claim of gay services executive David Hansell that the CDC deviated from sound medical judgment; Fears...

  • CDC funds expand HIV prevention effort.  // AIDS Alert;Dec2010, Vol. 25 Issue 12, p140 

    The article reports that 11.6 million dollar grants will be issued by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to support the demonstration project fro HIV prevention.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics