Late Settlement Averts First Jury Test For Allegations Against General Electric's Omniscan

Gerth, Jeff
January 2011
Pro Publica;1/23/2011, p2
Blog Entry
It has been stated that the case that would have disclosed evidence that General Electric's Omniscan, a drug used to enhance Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRIs), cause hundreds of kidney patients to suffer nephrogenic system fibrosis, has been settled on late Sunday night with plaintiff Loralei Knase. It has been stated that officials with GE Healthcare, the unit that makes Omniscan, have stated that the settlement does not mean that the firm is involved in wrongdoings.


Related Articles

  • Neutron Jack's Booty. Mokhiber, Russell // Multinational Monitor;Oct2004, Vol. 25 Issue 10, p29 

    Reports on the settlement of the lawsuit filed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission against General Electric company. Alleged failure of the company to inform its former chair and CEO John Welch Jr. about the substantial benefits under an employment and post-retirement consulting...

  • VISA SETTLES WITH AMEX FOR $2.25 BILLION.  // CardLine;11/9/2007, Vol. 7 Issue 45, p34 

    This article reports on the settlement agreement reached by American Express Co. (AmEx) with Visa Inc. and some member banks. In exchange for the settlement payments, AmEx will drop Visa as a defendant from a lawsuit that alleges Visa, MasterCard Worldwide and their member banks colluded to...

  • Fair settlement and the non-settling defendant: In re Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan and... Austin, Anne L. // Case Western Reserve Law Review;Summer93, Vol. 43 Issue 4, p1449 

    Opinion. Comments on the right of the non-settling defendant to procedural protection based on the US Second Circuit Court's ruling in the case `In re Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan & IRAP Litigation.' Policies underlying settlement, contribution rights and judgment reduction methods;...

  • Wells Settles Suit Over Disclosure Of Certain Fees. Breitkopf, David // American Banker;8/15/2005, Vol. 170 Issue 156, p6 

    Reports that Wells Fargo & Co. settled a class action lawsuit on Aug. 11 2005 by agreeing to pay between $19 and $34 million to as many as 96,000 merchants who claimed Wells Fargo Merchant Services did not adequately disclose the various fees it charges for processing payment card transactions...

  • Banks Make Headway with FCC on Phone Call Lawsuits. Wack, Kevin // American Banker;1/14/2015, Vol. 180 Issue 7, p1 

    The article focuses on U.S. banks' settlement with the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in class action lawsuits filed due to illegal phone calls to U.S. consumers. Topics include the FCC's rules regarding bank-consumer communication, banks' efforts to be exempted from liability, and...

  • General Electric Settles Mortgage Lawsuit with FHFA. Browdie, Brian // American Banker;1/24/2013, Vol. 178 Issue 13, p26 

    The article reports General Electric (GE) settled a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) which accuses the company of wrongdoing in the sale of mortgage-backed securities. The article notes GE's former mortgage lending unit was accused of misleading home finance...

  • Wrestling with the Judge Who Wants You to Settle. Killefer, Campbell // Litigation;Spring2009, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p17 

    The article focuses on the increasing number of out of court settlements and the strategies to avoid them. Two such cases from real life are given. In the first, an artist sues a movie studio, but later they agree for a settlement out of court. In the second, a person sues a large accounting...

  • Settling with Thousands? Ethical Issues in Mass Tort Settlements. Lockard III, Orlyn "Skip"; Boyd, Meaghan Goodwin // Environmental Litigation Committee Newsletter;Fall2009, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p1 

    The article focuses on ethical issues on mass tort settlements in the U.S. It stresses that majority of civil cases in the country are not tried due to engineered settlements that benefits plaintiff's counsel, corporate defendants and judges alike. It provides information regarding queries on...

  • UM -- ARBITRABILITY OF COVERAGE QUESTION -- FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6) -- MOTIONS TO DISMISS DENIED.  // Arbitration Journal;Jun79, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p57 

    This section reviews several court decisions in the U.S. related to arbitration and award. In U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. versus Ferraro, the presence of an arbitration clause in the uninsured motorist endorsement of an insurance policy does not act as a bar to judicial review of the insurer's...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics