TITLE

Comparison of Stability of Different Types of External Fixation

AUTHOR(S)
Grubor, Predrag; Grubor, Milan; Asotic, Mithat
PUB. DATE
June 2011
SOURCE
Medical Archives / Medicinski Arhiv;2011, Vol. 65 Issue 3, p157
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Stabilization of fractures by external fixator is based on the mechanical connecting of the pins, screwed into the proximal and distal bone fragment. Site of fracture is left without any foreign materials, which is essential for prevention of infections. Aim of this work is to compare stability of constructs bone model-external fixators of different types (Ortoix, Mitković, Charneley and Ilizarov). Stability is estimated under compression and bending (vertical and horizontal forces of 100 kg magnitudes, with distances between pins of 4 cm). Methodology: he mathematical-computer software (Tower, Planet and Planet Pro) was used in the laboratory for accurate measurements of MDP "JelŠingrad" company, Banjaluka. Interfragmental motions in millimeters at the appliance of vertical and horizontal forces were 2.80/2.56 at Ortoix (uniplanar fixator), 1.57/1.56 and fixator by Mitkovic-M20 (uniplanar fixator with convergent oriented pins), 0.16/0.28 at Charnely's external fixator (biplanar fixator), and 4.49/0.114 mm at Ilizarov's external fixator (fixator with two proximal and two distal rings, each attached on the 6 Kirschner wires). Results and discussion: It has confirmed that uniplanar fixation is easier and provides sufficient biomechanics circumstances in the site of fracture for bone healing, especially if the pins are oriented convergently. Ilizarov's fixator is multiplanar fixator, but its stability is dependent of tightness of wires, and provides adequate stability only in transversal plane. By other words, each fixator has its indications; selection of the fixator should be based on theirs mechanic characteristics, fracture geometry, and potential of bone healing, with permanent simplification of treatment, which has to be safe and acceptable for the patient. he main advantage of this study is its nature-the comparison of four most used external fixators, by the only one possible way--on the bone model. Each other way of comparison would result with much more questions than answers, due to unacceptable high bias of other parameters, which significantly influences on the results of the study.
ACCESSION #
66347074

 

Related Articles

  • Monoaxial Pedicle Screws Are Superior to Polyaxial Pedicle Screws and the Two Pin External Fixator for Subcutaneous Anterior Pelvic Fixation in a Biomechanical Analysis. Vaidya, Rahul; Onwudiwe, Ndidi; Roth, Matthew; Sethi, Anil // Advances in Orthopedics;2013, p1 

    Purpose. Comparison of monoaxial and polyaxial screws with the use of subcutaneous anterior pelvic fixation. Methods. Four different groups each having 5 constructswere tested in distractionwithin the elastic range. Once that was completed, 3 components were tested in torsion within the elastic...

  • Percutaneous reduction and external fixation reliable for heel fractures. Beadling, Lee // Orthopaedics Today Europe;Sep/Oct2009, Vol. 12 Issue 5, p19 

    This article discusses a study which examined the reliability of percutaneous reduction and external fixation as a technique to obtain a stable reduction of intra-articular, displaced calcaneal fractures.

  • Biomechanics of Olive Wire Positioning and Tensioning Characteristics. Antoci, Valentin; Voor, Michael J.; Roberts, Craig S.; Antoci Jr., Valentin // European Journal of Trauma;Oct2006, Vol. 32 Issue 5, p456 

    The effect of the olive wire on the stiffness of external fixation was studied previously, but there is limited data on the effect of the olive wire positioning and tensioning characteristics on the stiffness of external fixation. This study evaluated the influence of olive wire positioning...

  • Different factors predict CentraLoc and Intrafix fixation of quadruple hamstring allografts in low density cadaveric tibiae. Smith, Chad; Nyland, John; Krupp, Ryan; Sparks, Brad; Nawab, Akbar; Caborn, David // European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology;Apr2008, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p203 

    When using a quadruple semitendinosus–gracilis (STG) graft for ACL reconstruction tibial fixation is often the weak link. This study attempted to determine the relationship between perceived quadruple STG graft-tibial tunnel fixation quality using either a CentraLoc or an Intrafix device...

  • A prospective comparative study of pin site infection in pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: daily pin care vs. no pin care. Kao, Hsuan-Kai; Chen, Mei-Chuan; Lee, Wei-Chun; Yang, Wen-E; Chang, Chia-Hsieh // Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery;Jul2014, Vol. 134 Issue 7, p919 

    Introduction: Pin site infection is a critical issue for patients' safety in skeletal fixation using percutaneous pins or wires. Closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wires fixation are the mainstay of treatment in pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. Little information is available...

  • Comparative clinical study on deformity correction accuracy of different external fixators. Eren, Ilker; Eralp, Levent; Kocaoglu, Mehmet // International Orthopaedics;Nov2013, Vol. 37 Issue 11, p2247 

    Purpose: In this study, the correction accuracy of Smart Correction spatial fixators and of Ilizarov-type external fixators are compared in terms of deformity complexity. Methods: Seventy-seven (40 male, 37 female) bone segments of 57 patients treated with a Smart Correction device were compared...

  • Review: Weak Evidence Supports External Fixation for Displaced Distal Radial Fracture. Handoll, H. H.; Huntley, J. S.; Madhok, R. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Feb2008, Vol. 90-A Issue 2, p451 

    In this article researchers seek to answer whether patients with distal radial fractures receive better results from external fixation or the traditional treatment. The researchers used randomized controlled trials. Results indicated that in patients with displaced distal radial fractures, very...

  • Proximal humerus fractures: a comparative biomechanical analysis of intra and extramedullary implants. Füchtmeier, B.; May, R.; Hente, R.; Maghsudi, M.; Völk, M.; Hammer, J.; Nerlich, M.; Prantl, L. // Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery;Sep2007, Vol. 127 Issue 6, p441 

    The biomechanical stability of a newly developed humerus nail (Sirusâ„¢) for the treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus was analyzed in comparison to established systems. In total, three randomized groups were formed ( n = 4 pairs) from 12 matched pairs of human cadaver humeri. All...

  • KOMPLIKACIJE OPERATIVNOG LIJEÄŒENJA PRIJELOMA DIJAFIZE NATKOLJENIÄŒNE KOSTI. Šadić, Sahmir; Pavić, Vladimir; Čustović, Svemir; Fazlić, Mirsad // Acta Medica Saliniana;2007, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p126 

    Introduction: Numerous methods are used when treating fractures of the shaft of the femur. Intramedullary locked nail for shaft fractures is a method of choice with adults. In this paper we analyzed results of shaft fractures treated: definitely by an external fixation, intramedullary nailing...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics